Yes, you *do* need the money that bad, you oversensitive twat. (Hooters for Neuters)

Maybe the heat is getting to me (onehundredandmotherfuckinfivemotherfuckindegrees and of course this is the day that the air on the damn car goes out), but I just saw a news piece that really irked me.

Apparently, the Los Angeles Animal Services is in dire need of money. Last year alone, they euthanized about 19,500 animals- a problem that is surely exacerbated by the fact that people throughout the city simply aren’t neutering their animals. Maybe they don’t because of the cost. Maybe they don’t because it’s an inconvenience. Hell, maybe they don’t because they are giant, flaming douchebags. Or turd sandwiches.

I digress.

One way that the above problem can be addressed is by setting up free (or discounted) spay and neuter clinics for pet owners to come to. Unfortunately, the above requires money. Something that requires even more money is the Animal Services’ five year plan to completely eliminate euthanasia. Lofty, that’s what that goal is.

Anywho, long story short, Hooters saw a need and offered to host a highly publicized bikini contest in the name of Animal Services. At first, AS agreed, but before long, complaints rolled in and the idea was scrapped.

My issue with the above perhaps stems strictly from personal opinion: Hooters ain’t a strip club, it ain’t porn, and the girls ain’t hookers. It’s a restaurant. Sure, it has a more sexual tone than most, but it isn’t anywhere near the filfth it is often held up against. Hell, there are bars that are far worse (Coyote Ugly, etc.). Who knows, maybe my opinion is based in the fact that I’m a modern, independent, 2006 sorta woman. Oh, or maybe it’s because I’ve been brainwashed that being overtly sexual is a good thing by our penis having overlords. Who knows.

My real beef: while watching the article on the news, some harpy from Animal Services had this to say, “We need money. We don’t need money that bad! :rolleyes: : followed by a bitchy, evil cackle:.”

Listen bitch, ya do need the money that bad. Killing damn near 20k animals a year shows that something sure as fuck ain’t right with the way you are operating. When a perfectly legal, widely accepted community member wants to give you thousands of dollars, your dumb ass needs to take it.

Furthermore, fuck the city for backing down from the offered charity. Grow a back bone and take the goddamn money. Or fire the above mentioned dumb bitch, thus leaving her salary open to donate to the cause.

And to this:

*“As a city, we need to stand for something and make social statements,” Petrotta said. “On one hand, we’re disciplining city employees for sexual harassment; on the other hand. we’re aligning with companies like Hooters, whose whole purpose is to exploit women for money.” *

Puh-leeeze. If you really care about those poor widdle exploited women, why don’t you go close down all sex shops, strip clubs, Hooters, bars, or any place that involves women possibly getting “exploited”? And what kind of dumb ass bitch compares sexual harassment to a chick in shorts that delivers buffalo wings and beers to a table for a solid pay and tips? Come on. Plus, I’m sure when people think of Los Angeles, the first thing they think of is, “Ah yes, that wonderful, morally upright city!”

Linkity Mc Link Link

Idealists annoy me. This lady, and anyone else who opposed this fundraiser, cares more about some made up concept of what women should do than she does about actual real living animals that she’s supposed to be taking care of. I hope someday she realizes how fucked up she is.

Man, they make it sound like Hooters is some hardcore XXX strip bar where the waitresses give a guy a blowjob along with his order of hotwings and make the kiddies watch.

I’m with that concept except for the kiddies watching

Hot Wings with Happy Endings.

Time to start writing my business plan.

Be sure to point out that it’s cheaper than that bleu cheese dip.

SORRY!

I’m with you, on this, but Hooters is a yucky place. If they want to raise money for a good cause, they should be encouraged to do so. But still, it’s kind of yucky. It actually is a lot like a strip joint, only everyone keeps their tops on. Guys get to flirt with a hot, subservient chick and she pretends to enjoy it. Then they get up and leave and she cleans up after them, a couple sawbucks richer. It’s not a Menace to Decent Citizenry; It’s just really pathetic.

Unfortunately public perception is pretty important when you’re hitting people up for money and the cash Hooters brings in might not be worth the bad publicity of being associated with them.

Marc

Exploitation? Holy shit, Hooters is forcing women to work there?!?! Sweet jumping Jesus, my stepsister is working at Hooters right now! I’d better hurry up and go save her, before they coerce her into wearing clothing less revealing than her tennis outfit and collecting scads of money from drunken men for one moment longer!

…(a few minutes later)…

My God, it’s worse than we thought. I just called my sister, and – get this – she thinks she’s working there voluntarily. This insidious corporation has clearly found some way to corrupt not only the morals of our nation’s young girls, but their very thoughts as well. Why are we sitting here pitting L.A. Animal Services? We must unite! We must stand alongside them, and take action before it’s too late! Do it for my sister, or for yours, or for your daughters…do it for the youth of America! We must…act…NOW!

(thinks it over for a second)…

Or we could just neuter the bitch from L.A.A.S. and be done with it. I’ll throw in ten bucks toward the operation; seems like a worthy cause.

Gotta agree, Diosa — although this ain’t about Hooters specifically. The donor could’ve been anybody.

Lots of people like to donate money to worthy causes — and they’re not all morally upright, upstanding members of the working class who legitimately got their wages doing something honorable, like stitching stars on the Stars & Stripes or working at We-Dry-Clean Priest-Collars 24/7. You can’t know who they all are, and it’s the thought that counts, the charity and the … uh … givingness to the cause that matters, not the source. And where did the source’s source get the money?

Hell, most of the money in the world has been handled by a criminal at one time or another.

It’s ridiculous to think that any agency can cast limits on who is worthy enough to be charitable. Sheesh. Didn’t we just do this thread two years ago about the Salvation Army turning down money because they thought it was dirty?

This happened in California? Sounds more like the Deep South. It is good that the PC left-wing is reaching out to the Bible-belt right-wing.

Has to be said: Hooters has many fingers in many pies.

That said, i’m with MGibson and saoirse… wow. Maybe they just didn’t want to be sponsored by Hooters. Its not “i’m too good for them” but “other serious sponsors won’t sponsor a Hooter’s Animal Shelter”.

Unless it was the Hooter’s Snowy Owl Sanctuary.

If Hooters wants to donate the money so badly, they can clean up their act and start being a family restaurant and stop being a softcore strip club. Or they can raise the money and then pass it along to the animal shelter anonymously.

Yeah, Hooters has the moral high ground here. :rolleyes:

Is that a whoosh or are you serious? Softcore strip club? Please.

Titties for Kitties didn’t work? How can they be against responsible ownership of those cute, lovable, cuddly… ummm… dogs and cats?

I think it’s sad that you think of these women as pathetic. They have every right to work that job, and it doesn’t make them bad people, or pathetic, or exploited, or any of this nonsense. The only way that model flies is if you assume women are just too dumb to see they’re being used or too weak to make a different choice.

I’ve noticed that there are few people who want to contribute to anything badly enough to be insulted by morons for the privilege. As Mark Twain once said to a pastor agonizing that a recent large tithe was “tainted money,” “That’s right: 'tain’t yours, and 'tain’t mine.” Interposing your moral prejudices between a deserving charity and potential solvency is an evil act, no matter how wonderfully pious and disapproving of others you are.

Nobody else involved seems to be occupying the position of willing contributor to a cause that loudly advertises its need to serve the public, but even more loudly advertises its need to proclaim its prudishness, even at the expense of its mission. Don’t be rolling your eyes, sweets: you’ll sprain something while looking down your nose.

Donate. You said donate, right? As in, we’re going to raise money for you, and then give the money to you, because you said you needed it. Right?

Seems to me that Hooters has another option besides “cleaning up their act.” It’s the one where they say, “OK, you stupid fuckfaces, I guess you don’t really need any money.” And, of course, the net result is that more little animals get killed because so many of us are just fucking terrified of sex. Roll those eyes, boss.

Better any number of animals be killed, even slowly and painfully, than to publicly acknowledge male interest in women’s bodies.

So who exactly is being exploited by Hooters? Is it the waitresses, who are getting paid and usually well tipped; or is it clientele, who will overpay and overtip simply for a pretty woman to pretend to be interested in them? Am I missing something?

bluethree, I was just in Hooter’s the other night. There was more than one family (with kids, I mean) eating dinner there. There were two women in their 40s or so eating at a table by themselves, no husbands or byfriends around. There was a large family looking group of adults that came in while I was leaving. It’s certainly not Denny’s or Chuck E Cheese obviously, but it’s not The Pussy Cat Club either. I’ve taken my daughter there one time (she was three a the time).

So, maybe you and your family won’t eat there, but others do.