[QUOTE=bluethree]
For all of you who insist I absolutely can’t understand Hooters unless I’ve been there, will you please do your best to explain to me what I’m missing by not going there?
[/QUOTE]
What you’re missing is that you have failed to explain why, on the continuum from non-denominational church bakesale of hard-working blue-collar religious Iowans and Osama bin Laden why Hooters lies on the side of the line that says “we can only take money from these people on the sly.”
Their outfits are no worse than, for instance, a cocktail waitress in a casino. Would you accept a fundraiser from a casino?
Their outfits are no worse (and probably better!) than a bunch of cheerleaders doing a car wash donation/fundraiser. Would you give money to students dressed in skimpy clothing, getting wet and washing your car, as charity?
Their outfits are no worse than what you’d see on television in an advertisement for beer. Are beer companies not allowed to openly donate money to worthy causes?
Would you accept a donation from a lingerie show from, let’s say, Victoria’s Secret or Frederick’s of Hollywood?
Do you think it should be policy for all charities, political organizations, and public agencies to run background checks on all donators before deciding if they’re allowed to run a fundraiser for them?
It seems to me as if you have a thing about Hooters particularly, and I’d like to hear your answers on this so I can better understand if you’re applying your standards consistently.