This is something I have a problem with and it concerns this nonduality bit. It’s a bit off of the “everything is one”, and the aspect of there not being an independent self. How everything that appears seperate is just an expression of the universe. SO if everything is one then that means that there are no friends and no one else.
It’s an extension of the “no self” proclaimed truth from buddhism. That what you see before you is merely just an extension of the universe and not something independent with it’s own essence. Therefor, seperateness is just an illusion since everything is connected by being part of the whole.
Not meaning to slag on the OP, but it’s always interesting to see Westerners’ take on Buddhism. I lived in a Buddhist society, Thailand, for most of my adult life. (I’m in my 60s now.) My Thai wife is a Buddhist. It’s a toss-up which is more bizarre – Western Buddhists who have never personally experienced a Buddhist society; or Eastern Christians from Buddhist societies who have never personally experienced a Christian society. The Thai Christians I knew back in Thailand were straight out of left field.
(Disclaimer: I am neither a Buddhist nor a Christian.)
The word after what should’ve been “Therefore” should’ve been “separateness”.
How did I catch that, if you didn’t? Are we somehow viewing stuff differently, with me spotting things and choosing to bring them to your attention — even while I’m aware of yet other things, which I’m choosing not to bring to your attention?
Are you and I, like, separate? In some for-real, no-foolin’ sense?
There is a self. It’s one of the few things we can actually be confident of. I’m a Pyrrhonist skeptic by inclination and even I can’t deny the self. Anyone that does is so far in left field that there is no conversation to be had. By nature of the fact that “I” am conceiving this thought, it proves the “I.” Everything else might be fake, but the I has to be there. “I” might be a brain in a vat or a pink luck dragon dreaming along the beaches of Titan, but ‘I’ must exist or else there would be nothing that is perceiving.
I instructed you several months ago to not start a new thread every time you have a philosophical thought. You’re welcome to continue posting in any of your numerous existing threads, and people can keep responding to you as you post in them. But no more of this. If you keep at it, you may start earning warnings.
For those other posters participating in the discussion, if this is a topic of particular interest to you, you’re welcome to start your own thread and link back to this one for reference. This particular thread is closed.