A friend of mine went to the premier and loved it. He said Stiller and Will Farell are in rare form. But for Stiller it’s not that rare. I’ve loved him ever since “The Ben Stiller Show”. I always thought that got canceled way to prematurely. The U2 spoof was a classic. Anyone else see this show?
He gave it one star because he’s offended by the movie’s politics (?!), not because the movie’s bad. I want to see it too, I haven’t heard anyone claim the it isn’t funny.
Anyone else notice that ZOOLANDER seems to go into Bret Easton Ellis territory (braindead militant models?)
I’ve heard two reviews of it on the radio today, both compared the movie to an overlong SNL skit and Dumb and Dumber. I haven’t seen the movie, nor do I plan to. Not into “base humor.”
Not quite. The plot involves Americans oppressing a Muslim nation (Malaysian child labor), and a plot to assasinate its leader.
Roger make a big deal about the fact that they used Malaysia instead of a fictionalcountry, and excised the WTC from it, but not refrences to killing a Muslim. Also, that the prime minister is uncredited, and the film is thus racist.
I think Ebert dislikes the fact that this film is about an assasination attempt in a country with a red, white and blue flag which has large twin towers in their largest city. That’s right-the film takes place in Maylasia.
Well, I just got back from seeing Zoolander. I think everyone already has a pretty good idea of how they’re going to feel about it. If you like stupid humor, you should go, because it’ll have you in stitches. Otherwise, save the money.
I saw it yesterday with my husband. I agree that Ebert panned it for the wrong reasons. I was not offended by any aspect of this movie. In fact, I was too bored senseless to be offended. IMHO, the only funny parts are the ones you’ve already seen in trailers and commercials (“How can children learn to read when they can’t even fit inside the building?”). The only other funny part was a scene at a gas station (those who have seen it know what I’m talking about).
It wasn’t the worst movie ever, but it certainly was not as full of laughs as I would have expected. At the very least, see a matinee so you don’t pay full price for it.
I have to speak up here, only to concur with RickJay’s comment about Will Ferrell. He is hideously, violently UNfunny, and he just about ruins everything in which he appears. He almost personally ruined “Jay & Silent Bob” (though it had its own inherent weaknesses). One semi-amusing bit part in “Austin Powers,” and suddenly the guy is spreading like crabgrass. Someone needs to tap him on the shoulder and say, “Hey, give us all a break already. You need to find work for which you’re qualified…and I noticed that the Taco Bell down the street is hiring…”
There. That’s my one acerbic rant for the day. Thank you for enabling my behavior.
Ebert wants to judge everything by its cinematic merits. He rarely acknowledges a movie as simply “fun brain candy.” There’s a big difference (to me anyway) between a “bad” movie and an entertaining “brain candy” movie.
I love Ben Stiller’s comedic skills even if the rest of the movie doesn’t hold up.