I hesitate to start this thread because every time I start an AI thread, it ends in tears. Not like last week’s thread which held a pretty lively conversation on what is too mean when it comes to judging. No, I mean ugliness that ends up in the Pit.
So, be nice.
Is the President pre-empting Idol today?
[QUOTE=vivalostwages]
Just one hour for Idol tonight, though, as opposed to the previous two-hour blocks.
[/QUOTE]
Thank God. When I originally became addicted to this show, I had no kids, a low-stress job, and as much time to devote to television as I wanted. Now I have two kids, one on the way, a job that sucks up most of what remaining free time I have, and it’s increasingly difficult to carve out four hours of weeknight time to sit and watch Idol. I mean, don’t get me wrong, I love the show, but four hours in one week is a bit much. Hell, these days I don’t even watch the results show. I just get the info off the Internet later.
I guess I’ll never make a good music judge, because I don’t see how the grapevine guy’s belting was “over the top” and “cabaret”, but the blues guy was a million percent wonderful when he’s doing essentially the same thing.
I liked the cheerleader, too. I don’t know what their objection to him was, except they saw “cheerleader” on his form and automatically discounted him.
[QUOTE=Diogenes the Cynic]
I thought the blonde was just ok, but Simon tends to be a little soft on hotties.
[/QUOTE]
It’s about marketability, after all. Can’t really blame him for liking the hotties.
I like the bum guy - damn good. He will need to change his look a little bit, but I hope he keeps some of his original self. I’d hate to see him end up with a Clay Aiken haircut.
A question about the montages they do - sometimes they’re showing the rejected people singing songs that weren’t shown in their audition. Are they letting them sing a half-dozen songs at the audition because they’re horrible, and keeping that for later?