|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
SDMB Diplomacy Commentary
This thread is for commentary on the latest SDMB Diplomacy game discussing the moves and strategy of the players.
|
| Advertisements | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
And the game is afoot. I don't think it will be too long before we see those players with experience coming to the fore against those who are newer.
Does anyone know which of the players has previous experience playing and which are relatively new to the game? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Omniscient, Malacandra, John DiFool, and treis have all played in numerous SD Dip games. I have played in, I think, 2, and got my keister handed to me.
That, and 2 IRL games are the extent of my Dip Experience. I cannot speak for any of the others. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
If by "numerous" you mean "one, maybe two" then yes - I only remember one. But I used to play a fair bit FTF back in the 1970s and 80s. Open press will make a difference, of course.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
My apologies. I could have sworn you were in both of the games I played.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
You may be right - I have vague memories of being stitched up as England, and rather clearer ones of something similar as Italy; I think that's the limit here though. (One other online game in recent years, but not on the Dope.)
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've never played, here; commented on some yes.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
A *huge* difference - I can't imagine how one would even start diploming (sp?) without the ability to say the same thing to two different people...
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well they are doing a good job so far at being diplomatic.
I think 1901 is going to be fairly calm, with a bit of jockeying for position, but I think 1902 when countries start butting heads after their first build is where the real diplomacy is going to start. Open press is not going to be stabbing someone in the back, as much as stabbing someone in the front while everyone else looks on approvingly. It also makes for good reading. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
First one was a less than stellar showing as Turkey. Got tripled by France, Germany, and Russia in my second one. I almost saved that with a brilliant (if I may say so) tactical stab against Germany. I chickened out at the last second, but the GM accidentally posted my first set of moves. Thus I tipped my hand to Germany but didn't get the benefit of the stab. Third game I did pretty well as Austria but ended up losing due to a boneheaded Germany. This should be interesting I guess. Open press heavily advantages the countries with tactical strength, i.e. Turkey and England. The biggest problem when playing those countries is that you don't know if Austria/Russia and France/Germany have united against you. If you do know they have allied and you know their allies moves just as well as they do then it is going to be much easier to defend. I think the winner is going to be whomever guesses right in tactics, which isn't really the spirit of Diplomacy. Last edited by treis; 07-07-2009 at 12:28 PM. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Russia doesn't seem to be worried about the apparent cooperation between France and England.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Something I've noticed as well....
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Should I be concerned by the deafening silence in the Dip thread?
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, don't worry about it.
![]() I decided that it might be best to keep my peace until I saw how the first season's moves turned out. It's entirely possible, perhaps even likely, that others have chosen to do the same. Open press is new to me, so actions will probably speak a great deal louder than words for divining the intentions of the other powers. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
In closed press there would a lot more to say. I decided to throw out some real negotiation anyway (because I thought keeping my mouth shut over the issue I raised might be more dangerous than bringing it up), but yeah things will pick up after the spring moves...
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
As it turns out, I have plenty of other things besides French-English cooperation to worry about.
Wow, Malacandra, an all-out attack on Russia in 1901? You've got guts, I have to give you that. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can someone explain what the heck this is all about? Or link to an explanation thread.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thoughts...
Russia: Two front wars don't work. I foresee insurmountable problems in your future. England: Exactly the opening I expected, but it was spoiled in a serious way by France and Russia. You'd better hope France isn't blowing contrition smoke and Russia collapses from behind. France: Sealion? Seriously? Hell, it might work. Maybe. Germany: The French army in Burgundy is a concern, but the pressure on England should aide in your strong beginning. Italy: You lost your chance at a Lepanto with the move to TUS. Your best bet is to screw around like a crazy fox. Austria: I don't think the opening moves could have gone better for you. Turkey: I bow to your balls of nickel-plated steel. |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ah, now we see the bitter sniping and accusations.
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
... and soon I'm sure we'll see the violence inherent in the system.
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can we taunt them twice? Or do we have to wait until the French are in England?
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Help! Help! I'm being oppressed!
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
This game is beginning to heat up nicely.
Not long until Autumn falls.
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, Diplomacy is like bridge - a bit boring without the arguing.
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I hope I got that right.
Nice to see a full set of orders from everyone as well. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nope. You didn't. You need to be using a better Judge if that's what it told you to do
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
[Boos from the audience]
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Understatement or the year
. Even more so when the players don't know each other or haven't Diplo'd each other before (which I assume).
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
The number of players who seem to be taking the "don't say anything" approach is amazing to me. Open press heavily favors strong, open alliances.
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
What went wrong, Cat? Don't take it too much to heart - there are plenty of players here who will pick up on minor misadventures like that North Sea thing, so it won't spoil the game. (We used to think, back when I was at school, that if a piece was ordered to move then it couldn't remain in the space it came from if something else moved in; but we were wrong - if it's "bounced" it's treated as if it Held, with no support, in the space it was trying to leave.)
|
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I admit I expected more of the, "Hi everyone! I am allied with [other country]. If he betrays me, you all will know of his duplicity," shout-it-from-the-rooftops type stuff, rather than the current hedging of bets and ambiguous "promises." - - - Russia seems rather full of bluster for someone so outmaneuvered and outwitted. Italy is TYR doesn't seem to me to be unexpected. How else does an Italian have fun in the game? Last edited by garygnu; 07-15-2009 at 04:52 PM. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can I request either a substitute or a week's pause? I'm off to the Lake District this weekend and have learned I will not have internet access until I get back (I know, and in 2009 already. Sorry, I thought it was like the place I went to at Easter where at least I could go to the site office). I will get builds and, if possible, Spring '02 orders in before I go, but it would help to brief a stand-in if I need one.
|
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll be gone until the following weekend. May be back late Saturday.
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Saturday to Saturday?
|
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have no problems with someone subbing in for you while you are away to keep the game going at it's current rate.
Failing that, it will be a weeks extra scheming for all concerned. Who knows, you may even find a net connection somewhere in the wilds. Builds and early orders for Spring '02 would be welcome. |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
My apologies to all in advance, but I will be facing a similar problem - I have a vacation in the San Juan Islands scheduled for July 24th to August 2nd - I might have internet access for a day or two on either end, but I'm certain I won't for the bulk of that week.
I wouldn't ask for a pause for that much time - that would be unreasonable. Do you think I could find a sub, though? |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
It looks like Austria has gone from a good position to a very bad position because of poor diplomacy.
|
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's one way to put it.
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Seconded. Screwing Russia over, then making her an ally against Austria ? The idiom "cheap fiddle" comes to mind
|
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Builds done, let's see how people react.
|
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
The tone of the proposal was very heavy handed, this is true, but our Russian seems to have a death wish.
|
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
@CatInASuit - As of about now my enforced absence begins - I may have time to check in later and see if there is anything requiring my attention before I leave, but I can't guarantee it. Orders for Spring are in. |
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks Malacandra,
If anyone would like to sub in for a week now or sub in for wevets later on, please let me know. The only good thing about open press is that a sub can see what is going on without having to read a large backlog of emails. |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm clever, but not prescient... the phase won't end without me unless the GM decides it should, now will it?
|
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll have you know that I am made only of the finest balsa!
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|