I’m sad to report that this is simply. not. true.
This is a point well taken. There are obviously places a woman can go and find someone desperate enough to have sex that they will pay attention to her. The gist of the list seems to be oriented toward getting action in terms of getting reasonably attractive or desirable men (however defined) to pay attention to you or otherwise be attracted to you, and women can fail at this, and do, all the time. Even moderately desirable men have options and they will tend to avoid women who have personality or emotional issues.
Essentially all dating advice is about hiding the faults and flaws in yourself that you refuse to accept in other people. It’s not about finding a life partner or companion or anything like that. It’s about becomming the sort of girl or guy that your typical douchebag or slut would try to pick up in a bar or club for a one night stand.
So, the buttons that say “The way to a man’s heart is through his stomach. . . and up under his ribcage” are inaccurate?
Yes. The actual end to that sentence is …" through the gaping hole in his chest."
The problem with going “through his stomach…and up under his ribcage” is that it requires a longer blade than going between the ribs.
I thought that women dieted, exercised and dressed up in order to feel more attractive in themselves? I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve been angrily told it’s not for men’s benefit. Also, Cosmo sex advice always struck me as more about how to get better orgasms.
Perhaps the “low enough” bar differs. I mean, I was prepared to accept fat, unlovely, fourteen years my senior and a bunch of personality flaws all in one great package, and it was often still not enough. Admittedly I never went hunting for an incontinent senile septuagenarian, so call me Mr Picky if you like. :dubious:
But to make the gaping hole I’d need bolt cutters or something to take care of that pesky sternum and rib plate…I can manage to carry a knife with my crutches, but I don’t think I could manage bolt cutters also :dubious: