You know… morons.
Wow. That is some shitty behavior on Mr. Halbig’s part. He obviously doesn’t know his ass from a hole in the wall and is using this tragedy as a springboard to launch himself. Bravo to the Sandy Hook school board for allowing him to spew forth and for not feeding him and his ego.
“There’s nothing wrong with you I can’t fix… with my hands.”
Well, denialism is a dish best served chilled.
As soon as I see one, just one, video of that jet crashing into the Pentagon
(and I don’t mean that ridiculous 3 frames of something crashing and blowing up that they released) and when we find out why the guy flying the supposed jet made a big loop and crashed (more like landed into that part of the building instead of just aiming it right straight down, I’ll condemn these truthers too.
But until then…
I’m sorry the world wasn’t being videotaped for your convenience
I’m sorry the world wasn’t being videotaped for your convenience
The short answer is that dive bombing a jumbo jet isn’t a thing you do.
We’ve covered this shit plenty of times.
You’ll continue to support these vandals and JAQoffers, gotcha.
Can you loop a 757? I guess maybe you could once, and that’s all they needed, but my money’s still on the wings falling off at the top of the loop and there were clearly wing parts at and in the scene rather than scattered all over Arlington County. :rolleyes:
koufax, if after all the times we’ve tried to explain reality to you that’s what you truly believe (and I know what you meant by “loop” and couldn’t resist making fun of you more) then you are a blithering idiot too stupid to be allowed sharp objects or opinions.
“I’m sorry the world wasn’t being videotaped for your convenience”
good answer! good answer!
Now I understand why they won’t release a real video of the plane hitting the Pentagon, because the “world wasn’t video taped for my convenience”
Thanks for finally clearing this up for me.
You doubt that was an Al-Qaeda plot because it could have done the Pentagon more damage than it did? I don’t see how it could have done the WTC more damage than it did.
Perhaps, because nobody happened to shoot such a video?
And until someone provides to me to a video of the earth from space (no, not those fake ones), I’m going to continue to claim that the world is flat. You’re an idiot.
The hell with that. I’m still waiting for the video of the Lincoln assassination.
Did you ever consider that they haven’t released such a video because one does not exist?
I mean, do you find a lot of places have video cameras pointed at walls? Or they have them pointed at other walls?
If there was one, the response would be: [Tinfoil hat]They had a camera pointed at the impact site? See! It was planned by the CIA![/tinfoil hat]
one does not exist? they had cameras on the building, across the street on the hotel and gas station!
It was the Pentagon! You are probably on camera in every area of that building.
But they show us a short video next to a parking lot entrance.
“Did you ever consider that they haven’t released such a video because one does not exist?”
You are right, one does not exist, probably about 50 exist.
I’m not saying the plane did not crash like they said, I want to know why we can’t see ONE video that proves it.
Maybe things are different in your world, but at gas stations they tend to point the cameras at the pumps and the cash registers. At hotels they point them at doors or other security points. Not at other buildings.
Not really. The Pentagon has a long, long history of choosing human security over some guy watching cameras. Your incredulity isn’t proof.
Because it was watching cars enter and exit the parking lot. I believe two such videos were release from two parking lots.
You know what? When you start your business, you can point the security cameras at all the buildings around you. Until then, you 50 videos are in your imagination only.
The debris, the pictures of dead bodies at the Moussaoui trial, and the huge number of eyewintesses, and much more isn’t enough for you?
That’s cruel.
Beating the snot out of them would be more fun.
And then make them provide conclusive proof that someone beat them up?
The poet didn’t specify where they should be shot. I’m sure he has ideas, though. (He’s kind of a vicious bastard, even for a poet.)
Reminds me of the old "Creationism vs. Baseball Bat" tactic