A new Chick tract! Rejoice!!!

jmullaney wrote:

Because somebody already beat them to the Oklahoma City Federal building.

<ducking & running>

Alas, no. Discounting the people who promulgate and believe the myth without even a cursory investigation, Carl Baugh and Don Patton still bear the torch at the Creation Evidence Museum.

Oh, and be sure you are using “the lastest version of Internet Explorer or Netscape” when you visit the site. Hee hee hee …

Hey, was I the only one who thought the Dinos were kinda cute?

http://home.flash.net/~twinkle/psycho/DARK/chick/

THIS site is kewl!
(yes, I misspell kewl on purpose. It’s a long story that dates back to high school. That’s my one sin.)

http://www.e-sheep.com/Saturnalia/

Personally, the site of two people, bare ass naked in the middle of winter, wearing nothing antlers would have me laughing my ass off!
(Although having the kids beat the drums…)

. . .check it out, fellow Chicksters:

Gotta love chick tracts. The well reasoned logic gets me every time. The believe b4 its too late or burn for ever really makes me think.
Is it just me, or did the good christian in the dino one look like hitler?

No, I thought he looked like Lazaro Gonzalez, Elian’s great-uncle!

I looked at that. Oh, for cryin’ out loud!! Read this page on how pink sunlight would make plants and people grow larger, “proving” the verse that claims “there were giants in those days!” (I assume that’s what they’re trying to prove. It doesn’t specifically say why they would claim pink sunlight would have this effect.) Why was sunlight pink? Because of the water canopy in the sky and that it was under such pressure, the hydrogen would have been compressed into a metallic state and act as fiber-optics, refracting sunlight into pink!

I had a better understanding of physics when I was in the sixth grade!

What distresses me the most about this is that I grew up in that part of Texas. (Dad took the family to Glen Rose several times to see the tracks even before it was a state park.)

I almost pointed that out, too. He definetly did.

D00D - THAT K1CKS AZZ. B1FF SEZ ROQ ON.

Thanks for the heads up, Badtz Maru. I went over to a friend’s dorm room this afternoon to inform her that there was a new Chick tract up, and she and her roommate both fired their browsers up right away. We’re always excited to see new Chick tracts, because nothing else on earth makes us laugh as hard as the work of Jack T. Chick. :slight_smile:

Actually, usually it’s the “athiests” who have mustaches in Chick tracts- this one was atypical in that regard.

I only wish the frame with “Eve wanted to become a god” had a little thought balloon over her head, showing a lightbulb-headed Eve…

-Ben

I’ve seen the “human tracks” in TX. I immediately wondered (I was about ten at the time) why they were positioned always at the precise same distance behind the dino tracks.

Hmm…could it be that they were part of the dino tracks? The fourth grade me decided: Yes, obviously! Duh!

Anybody think that “‘Eve wanted to become a God.’ - Jack Chick” would make an excellent .sig line for MPSIMS posts? :wink:

Welp. For some reason, my 11/12/2000 bleeding edge build of Mozilla did not qualify as the latest version of netscape. Here’s the URL for those similarly handicapped by antiquated browsers.
http://www.creationevidence.org/redirect/redirect.asp

Was severely underwhelmed by the site, btw. Besides a restrictive and annoying design, they had even less information then is typical for creationist fundie sites.

That (www.e-sheep.com/Saturnalia) was just bizarre. And confusing. Thank God I’m an atheist.