A parting gift for the homophobes

Or with hate in your heart, Shodan.

Krisfer the Cat, you can certainly quote the OP all you like. I’d appreciate it if you’d include a link to this thread when you quote it, and a reciprocal link here to the board where you quoted it. And I’m flattered.

You know, people, the straight supremacists aren’t really worth arguing with. They know, deep down, that their arguments make no sense whatsoever. They’re aware of their hypocrisy; it only makes them angry at the world. They’re closed, tight wads of flesh, desperately clinging to any ideology that will make them feel superior to someone, anyone. Otherwise they may have to face themselves, and the hateful, fearful bigots they really are.

Arguing with them can be entertaining, granted. It’s fun to watch them trot out the same dreary arguments every single freaking time, and then act all martyred when their bizarre reasoning is shot down with alacrity by rational people who’ve heard it all dozens of times before. But there are other tools to use; ridicule, I think, is going to be big for a while. Anger responds to anger, but doesn’t know how to deal with being laughed at. And you gotta admit, these eejits are funny.

I’m through treating them as if they have anything worthwhile to say on the subject of gay rights, just as I’d never get into a political debate with a five-year-old. They’re not going to understand your arguments, and they’re not going to change their minds. Contempt is the only emotion they rate, and they barely rate that.

They live for your outrage; like a monkey flinging its feces at passers-by, they hurl their excrement all over the boards to get your attention, to make them feel as if they have affected you. Arguing with the monkeys just makes them fling more shit.

I advocate a program of ridicule. Point, laugh, and make fun, and maybe, if we’re lucky, they’ll head back to their little lairs and we’ll be left to love each other as we will.

Thank you MrVisible.

I tend to agree with you about arguing with them…however I like trying to mess with their minds.:smiley:

and your post is now posted at my friend Lance’s board.
Crzy House

Well, depending on how literally one wants to read the Bible, you could use 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 as an example.

If one wants to know what the Bible (read literally) says about homosexuals, one can pick up the thing and read it. It doesn’t need to be posted constantly.

It might help to be tactful when you’re trying to spread the Gospel.

Speak of the monkeys, and the monkeys appear. Heya, JD. Burned any witches lately? Or is that one of those inconvenient biblical passages you people ignore?

I’m 37; can I play with whoever I want now? And I didn’t know you were everybody’s mom; you must get around.

And if you think gay sex is the equivalent of playing with a rabid dog, you’re doing it wrong. Or very, very right…

I hate to break it to you, but God gave your post a C-. You really need to work on your coherence, as well as your bibilical interpretation skills. You can, however turn in some genuine caring for your fellow human beings for extra credit, if you want to pull your grade up.

And of course I can speak for God; I have just the same authority to do so as you do. More, in fact, as I make sense.

Actually, if you didn’t have Jesus it still wouldn’t matter what we thought of you. Unless, of course, the accusations that have been made here ring true in your case. In which case, Jesus doesn’t like you much anyway.

Well if she has Jesus does that mean the rest of us have to divy up the Apostles? Or is that disciples… hell I never could get them straight…

umm that wasn’t a request for clarification BTW
Dibbs on St. John…

I have to admit I was wondering about that mention of a rabid dog and considered asking JD about that. But I decided it wasn’t worth it to me to get into that with her.

As for having Jesus on your side … I wonder if H4e does? Remember the kind of company he kept and the people you (H4e) spurn. Not for anything they necessarily do, incidentally. Just because of who they are.

Hmph, if anything bothers me about His4Ever, it’s that whole “maybe I should keep my mouth shut about this, since I know you all just want to censor me…” crap. Geez, woman, if you feel strongly about something, stop being such a wimp! But for a few minor rules of decorum, nobody here is censoring you, including all the times you get insulted. If anything, you should stay in the Pit and cut loose with all the pillow-biting and gerbil-stuffing remarks as fast as you can type them.

Let the good times roll!

Incidentally, I thought the original post was a pretentious piece of crap. I mean, writing in the second person? PuhLEEZE.

JerseyDiamond, I understand what you’re saying and I started this thread in Great Debates to talk about it.

PuhLEEZE tell me that was sarcasm or … something. Accusing MrVisible of homophobia is about on par with accusing Guinastasia of being anti-Catholic or accusing matt_mcl or Esprix or Hastur of being anti-gay.

Certainly, they would be permitted to say exactly that. You don’t get to call people epithets, but you’ll find that all kinds of whacked-out positions are tolerated by the administration here–though the members would instantly eviscerate the dumbass. Kinda like what happened here.

Oh, and punha–definite sarcasm.

I wasn’t accusing anyone of homophobia. What post were YOU reading?

I did, however, find the original post to be a touch sanctimonious and pretentious. “Your hatred is no longer acceptable.” ?

Why are we bothering to grace JerkyDiamond and Clueless4Ever with a pit thread?

They have both shown themselves to be intolerant. They believe that there is ONE TRUE WORD, and that the Bible they read is the unaltered word of their diety.

They use this to support their bigotries, even when it comes to themselves being discriminated against.

What is their to debate with people like that?

I was reading your post, Bryan. An OP that talked to people who are homophobes. Taking your post to mean that MrVisible was talking about himself was what you seemed to me to be saying.

It wasn’t sarcasm? Color me :confused:

I couldn’t figure it out either, minty green, without having to assume either that Bryan was joking or that he’s an ass. And given that I know next to nothing about him (which means I have no reason to think he’s an ass), I was hoping it was some joke I missed.

Maybe what he meant by that “second person” bit was that in his opinion the OP would have been better by saying “We aren’t going to take any more of your unfounded bigotry and hatred”?

Woah, woah, guys. Before you jump on Bryan, you should remember what ‘second person’ means: using the pronoun ‘you’ in writing. Bryan’s calling it pretentious because MrVisible is using ‘you’ without meaning anyone in particular. I think. But he was in no way implying that the OP included himself with homophobes.

I personally like the OP, but there’s no need to jump someone’s shit over a misunderstanding.

How ironic would it be if I were to say to you, Bayle, “Did you read my post?”:slight_smile:

“Maybe what he meant by that “second person” bit was that in his opinion the OP would have been better by saying “We aren’t going to take any more of your unfounded bigotry and hatred”?”

I.E. I know what the second person is, as is fairly easy to conclude from this quoted portion of my previous post:)

THYLACINE –

I wouldn’t bet on it. You’d be surprised what people are allowed to post; the mods are (thankfully) pretty big on free speech and open debate around here. A thread that said “All [whatever] must die!” would be closed in a New York minute, but a thread that opened [whatever – racism, homophobia, the inferiority of women, the superiority of the Tug Ahoy[sup]TM[/sup]] up to debate would likely be allowed. That’s because the Teeming Millions do a credible job of exposing bullshit when they see it.

GOBEAR and HOMEBREW – Thanks. :o

SHODAN –

No one ever said this. No one.. What THYCALINE asserted (wrongly, IMO) is that homophobia is tolerated here when racism is not. She never said H4E had anything to do with racism; she said H4E’s statements about homosexuality are akin to statements a racist might make about persons of another race. This is twice you have totally misrepresented what other posters have said regarding H4E in your zeal to defend her. This puzzles me. I know you’re a smart guy; why do you do that?

JERSEY –

How interesting that you cite only part of that powerful passage from Mark – and not, IMO the important part. The entire passage says:

Mark 22:28-34. Allow me to point out a couple of things to you here: First, the commandment Jesus quotes ("Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is One . . . ") is an OT commandment. Deut. 6:4-5. To that OT commandment, Jesus adds the NT commandment: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. This is not as important as loving God, but it is pretty darn close. Jesus says "There is no commandment greater than these – meaning both of them. The man to whom He speaks also reinforces that both commandments are of extreme import, and they are linked together.

Second, both the OT and the NT command that we love God not just with our hearts but with our minds and with our understanding. I would respectfully suggest that blindly following the printed word with no care to what it might really be intended to mean, and with no care to how it may affect your brothers and sisters and neighbors, is not really following this commandment at all. God does not want sheep. Faith is not the same as unthinking adherence to dogma.

Third, since when does loving God with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength mean that it’s okay to alienate your neighbors from His love by taking it upon yourself to judge them? The love of God does not require the spiritual condemnation of men – even if that was your perogative, which it is not.

So maybe you and H4E ought to re-read this passage in Mark and think about it, before you presume to correct JAR on what is an essentially correct point.

Oh, c’mon. (A) You don’t follow “God’s rules;” you follow some of them, selectively, but you discard others as not being “moral” or as being “overruled.” What sophistry is this? Loving God requires just that: That you love him, with all your heart, soul, mind, body, and spirit, and that you seek to do His will as it is given to you to understand it – not as some uninformed fundie tells you you must. (B) You are aware, are you not, that the Greek for “born again” here can just as legitimately be translated as “born from above”? Meaning, a new life in the fullness of the love of God. Of course you were, a Biblical quoter like yourself. © When your daughter disobeys you, does that mean she doesn’t love you? You conflate love and obedience, so that one may not have one without the other? (D) You have no priviledge to tell anyone they are or are not following the rules of God; for all you know, they are following them to the best of their ability and understanding. How can you claim to walk humbly before your God when you’re so busy judging how others walk with Him? Don’t you see a problem there?

Follow me closely here: YOU DON’T GET TO DECIDE WHAT IS “THE TRUTH” OF THE BIBLE. Especially when you don’t follow it exactly yourself. You have no greater insight into what it says or means than anyone else here. I disagree with your interpretation, and I find your claim to have “the truth” in this matter presuptuous and arrogant.

Your arrogance is breathtaking. Such a cold little statement, and just dripping with the love of your neighbor, right? I guess that commandment is one you selectively decide to ignore, like the one about keeping kosher or the one about covering your hair. As was said: Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men’s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will let those enter who are trying to.

That is what you do – you and H4E and everyone else like you.

Here endeth the lesson.

MrVisible… awesome OP. Without addressing any of the straight supremacists directly or by name, you drew them out into revealing themselves. The funniest part is that they continue to disavow the title, as you predicted, but they respond to the post anyway. Methinks the SS protest too much!

And Jodi, that was a beautiful post on the previous page. Very eloquent. It’s a reminder of why I read this board.

His4Ever, JerseyDiamond, and the other supporters of hatred here, please feel free to fuck off. MrVisible has given you a new title, go get a few buttons made and wear it with pride. The more you post, the more you prove that you are indeed straight supremacists.

We call Jodi butter 'cuz she’s on a roll…