Sounds like an AI-art challenge prompt: “President Trump with a bowl of mashed potatoes on his head”.
Perfect! He looks like Calimero. 
I’m partial to Twitler and the Manchurian Cantaloupe.
Malice or incompetence?
An employee at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence drained the resort’s swimming pool last October and ended up flooding a room where computer servers containing surveillance video logs were kept.
Secret Service phone logs and phones wiped, server room with video logs flooded, but somehow Ghouliani was able to keep Hunter’s laptop completely sealed and preserved with all sorts of evidence of something.
Tbf, that does sound like rather abusive parenting behavior (or in this case, I guess, uncle-ing behavior). [ETA: wait, am I off by a generation here? Not clear on the exact relation of Mary Trump’s dad to the other people in the story.] Also, I am not enthusiastic about the whole concept of public figures using anecdotes of their political opponents’ childhood misbehavior to humiliate them.
Trump as (technically) an adult has done so much stupid and irresponsible shit entirely on his own initiative that nobody has to resort to airing the familial dirty linen of his childhood in order to mock him.
Or accomplice?
Apparently, Mary Trump’s dad dumped a bowl of mashed potatoes over Little Donnie Fail-Fail’s head, because Donnie was tormenting his little brother. The point is that Donnie was humiliated, and hates to be reminded of it.
This is Trump’s stock in trade. I’d say turnabout is fair play.
Yes, I grasped that from the stated summary of the incident, but what I was blanking on was the exact nature of the familial relationships involved.
The compounding confusion here has now motivated me to google the facts, and I see that Mary Trump’s dad is in fact Donald Trump’s older brother, the late Fred Trump Jr. (as opposed to their younger brother Robert whom young Donald was picking on).
So yeah, the incident involved sibling conflict rather than abusive adult behavior, but I’m still not sure it’s a good choice of political mockery material.
-
Was Trump abused as a child?
We don’t really know. -
Would that be the cause of his own abusive behavior?
Perhaps. -
Was he just a kid, and did kid stuff?
Likely he did. We all did. -
Does the above matter?
Not. One. Bit.
It does not matter who he was. What matters is who he has become.
The point isn’t to mock him for having potatoes dumped on his head by his older brother, nor even to ridicule him for picking on his younger brother, as these are examples of normal child behavior. The point is that he is such a snowflake that even the mention of this small childhood embarrassment is enough to disable him in a debate.
Whether that’s true or not remains to be seen. Nor would testing it likely be good debate strategy. But, the suggestion is to needle Trump and show him to be a crybaby, not reveal family secrets or something.
So someone should just put a bowl of mashed potatoes on their podium during a debate. I’d really like to see that.
Does anyone think a food fight wouldn’t break out at a Republican debate?
I’d love to see that. Then, at an advantageous moment, Pick up the bowl and lurk behind PAB like he lurked behind Hillary at those debates.
I’d pay to see that.
While I don’t think the mashed potato thing is a good idea, I think Mary Trump is right that other candidates (both Republicans and Democrats) need to quit walking on eggshells around Trump and start regularly using terms like loser, twice impeached, failure, sexual predator, insurrectionist, etc. Repeat them like Ron DeSantis repeats the word “woke” five times in a sentence. Not only will it irritate the hell out of Trump, it may (yeah, I know, it’s a long shot) get some of his supporters to start reconsidering.
Is Tuberville going to run? Because having Mr. Potatovillage do this would be hilarious.
i believe dr trump was suggesting that one put donald trump into a situation that would have egg on his face; or as in the family anecdote potato on his head.
keep repeating he lost, he is a proven abuser, and a proven liar. hit those spots.
Or incompetent accomplice. Since none of the IT equipment was damaged.