Gold plated silver, of course. (Actually: plastic with a copper-coloured coating)
I’m not gonna post the website URL, but a quick Google search revealed that this website is still alive and well.
On sale now for $22.99.
Classy! Big time! 14 cent a piece! And made me laugh, thank you!
And if the grand juror or person with even remotely similar name or whatever it was that triggered the magat snowflake happens to be Black and the snowflake happens to be white? I don’t see that defense working in such an instance, sadly.
That’s what happens when you use the spray can version.
Not all. Remember, according to the magatoflatearth, some were FBI.
Perfect for serving fast food hamberders to pro athletes visiting the White House!
The latest court news, heheheh:
So much IRREFUTABLE whining winning.
Any more silly shit like this and lawyers are going to start getting sanctioned by the court.
“Start”?
“Frivolous” is a big deal. It means the court has determined that the plaintiff filed a case that they knew was without merit. Therefore, the plaintiff knowingly wasted the Courts time.
And of course, it’s completely unsurprising to see in this thread.
Yep. Rule 11 sanctions often follow a finding that a pleading is friviolous
(b) Representations to the Court. By presenting to the court a pleading, written motion, or other paper—whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating it—an attorney or unrepresented party certifies that to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances:
(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation;
(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law;
(3) the factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, will likely have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and
(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on belief or a lack of information.
Donald’s nemesis is the Hamburglar.
All of his pictures are not perfect?! I’m surprised to hear that. But I love that with everything else going on, a bad picture can make him mad. Sad!
As described in this article: https://www.wonkette.com/p/trump-maaaaaay-not-do-total-exoneration
Man, I laughed my butt off.
That still doesn’t narrow it down much.
That could be from any time after, what, 1985?
On to 2024!
Does anyone happen to know how Biden polls versus DeSantis in a hypothetical election?
I sort of want Trump to be Biden’s opponent because I would dearly enjoy watching that fool get humiliated again.
I’m neither a betting man nor a trained statistician, but perhaps Florida Bet can help you out.