A pitting of Liberal and the Mods that let it happen.

What the hell are you talking about? Again with the “foregone”. You’re conducting a monologue.

Hard determinism? Because I don’t believe in parallel universes? The hell.

Let’s see. Fishing through all those nice words about how mean I am, the only actual point I can find you making is that you’re a bitch because you can’t help yourself. Is that the gist of it?

Two whole posts. One defending myself from an attack, and the other defending Lissa. Both in one forum. Jesus, you’re a douche. You spew with the best of 'em, momma.

(Helpful hint: you can link to a post directly by right-clicking its number and selecting “Copy to clipboard”, and then pasting it into your text.)

That’s the worst limerick ever. It doesn’t even rhyme.

I’m a bitch because I hold you in contempt. What’s your excuse for your behavior? Oh, right – In ETF’s case, you suspect she might be saying mean things about you someplace else. Boo fucking hoo.

Yeah, to give credit where credit is due, your whacko flameouts do tend to occur in the Pit – as do your craven apologies or minimizations later. And the Pit is also where you took your light out from under a bushel to toot your own horn regarding your own generosity here, placing your own aggrandizement over the embarrassment you might cause the other party. And the Pit is where you pulled your whole “you won’t have Dick Nixon to kick around anymore” bullshit as you did in Post # 396 here. And, of course, the Pit is where you actually paid someone to go away rather than deal with them as an adult. In fact, most of the shabby behaviors that you engage in are in the correct forum. Congratulations.

What are you, in eighth grade?

I defy you to find any post where I have ever said anything as vicious as what you said to ETF – or where I have then attempted to minimize it as just some light hearted ribbing. I also defy you to find where I hav ever had my nose as far up someone’s ass as you did here.

If you’re going to call me a douche, then fuck off with your helpful tips, m’kay?

The tip is actually useful - he throws in the passive aggression as a bonus.

It may be the greatest leap forward in communication since words were chiseled on rocks; I’ll hear about it from someone who isn’t calling me names.

Liberal=- I’ll be your freind. And your’s too, Jodi.

You know dudes, some of us here have strong opinions, and when two+ people have stong opinions, there is bound to be disagreement. But in a MB, these disagreements tend to turn towards hate or worse.

Look, friends- once in a while we are just going to disagree and all the debating in the world won’t change that, but name calling and cursing only makes it worse.

Can’t we just agree to disagree? Sure, I disagree with Liberal (a lot :stuck_out_tongue: ) and with Jodi too. But I am mature and even minded enough not to convert that disagreement into dislike or hatred.

If you are a regular poster here, one who contributes- one who answers hard questions in GQ or gives good advice in IMHO or a shoulder to cry on in the PIT, or cute pet pics in MSPIMS or spiffy cites in GD - then, you* are* my friend. Even though we may disagree. Hell, I disagree strongly and often with Diogenes the Cynic- but I still admire his many contributions and have had fun in some of my debates with him. So- DtC is also my board friend.

In fact, that was my complaint about Badchad- he *never *“contributed”. Anywhere. At all. All he had was a drum with one stick and a hard-on for Polycarp. And, Polycarp is also my friend (or at least I consider him so)

Look dudes- I don’t know if Liberal did the right thing here or or not. But he has made some mighty fine contributions over many long years. I have had some satisfying (and not so satisfying) debates with him. He’s smart, he debates well, he contributes.

Ok, so you may think what Lib did here with this “bribe” is cheap and sleazy. Well, that’s fine, that’s your opinion. But can’t you just agree to disagree with Lib on this? Must this turn to hate?

And, when you do decide that someone has acted badly in a thread or is so damn fucking wrong it hurts- can you leave that aside for the next thread, OK? Don’t carry over grudges. Who knows- you may disagree 100% with Lib here but find yourself nodding in agreement at his comments in another.

Perhaps you’re failar with a quote from Winston Churchill, who once asked a woman if she’d sleep with him for a million dollars. She said sure. He then asked if she’d sleep with him for a dollar. She was insulted, proclaiming “what sort fo person do you think I am?” His response was “We’ve already established what you are, madam, now all we’re doing is haggling over the price.”

I never said they were equivalent, I said that the difference is a matter of degree. Sorry I touched a nerve, but you were calling people morons for saying they’d refuse money to leave the board. I’d refuse it. I don’t need it that bad, and I enjoy my time here.

Is any of that somehow precluded by not getting married? Just take the money, and live happily ever after. Again, you place a lower value on this board than many people. This board is interactive, and I have gotten a lot of value returned to me by being able to ask questions here. Apparently you do too, or you wouldn’t continue to spend 15 bucks per year to keep your membership.

Bully for you. Others wouldn’t. But according to you, they’re fucking morons if they don’t. Because they place value on different things than you. Some people have already sunk over 100 bucks into membership here, and plan on sticking around for a long time…maybe even long enough to sink 400 more in. Why would they give up that opportunity for something they enjoy?

Because I really don’t care one way or another. I wasn’t the one calling people fucking morons because they wouldn’t have taken a similar deal. What Exit? isn’t hated by a lot of people here, and enjoys posting. Why would he take the deal? For 500 bucks? That would be gone in 2 months worth of car payments, or one wedding cake…and then what? The cash is gone and you can’t go back to someplace you enjoy.

I feel sorry for people who have to make judgements on the actions of other people over something so trivial.
Gee, thanks for the affirmation. However, I think you’re a moron for equating my marriage to a membership on the SDMB. There you go.
[/QUOTE]

Since Liberal basically asked for it let’s make this a nice comfy Type 2 pile-on for him. My favourite example of Liberal showing his scummy, yet cloying, side:
“My Character Weakness”

Also, I wonder if prr is going to be as good at staying away as his benefactor Liberal.

From his triumphant return from his last suspension.

It’s not a grudge so much as it is an extremely poor opinion. I can’t just set it aside from post to post; who people think we are and the esteem in which they hold us (or lack thereof) is cumulative, based on posting history and perceived collective behaviors. I’m sure he doesn’t care for me, either.

What I can do, is go back to ignoring most of what he says and considering the source for the rest of it. If I’d merely stuck wth that, I could have saved myself a ton of aggravation. Other people will make up their own minds, I don’t need to beat them over the head with mine. So on this subject, I will fade back into the woodwork.

That was George Bernard Shaw*. Also, his point was that the woman’s virtue had a price. The fact that it was high made it a difference in degree, not kind, from a streetwalker. Rubystreak is saying that her posting priveleges are different in kind from her marriage.

It has been pointed out in another thread that everyone has a price for not posting at the SDMB. Hers is $500. She has no price for not marrying her husband. Since makes them different in kind, saying that the two are equivalent is stupid.
*Also, the offer was made in pounds. If it had been Churchill, it would still have been in pounds, genius.

OK, now you’re calling me a whore. Way to spread the SDMB love, Sparky. You’re late to this thread; I’ve already retracted my “fucking moron” comment. You’re looking to continue to engage me in this when frankly, I’m sick of this entire debacle. Go away, find someone else to insult.

And thanks, saoirse, for saying it better than I did.

DrDeth, I like your post and I liked what you said. I have made the same argument for both PRR & Der Trihs. I know I do not hate Lib and I have not professed any hatred for him.

However, do you not hold different posters in different esteem? Many posters I hold in high esteem and some in low esteem. Liberal’s actions this past week reduced my respect for him a great deal. Respect he had rebuilt since his return. I hope you find this understandable. This does not mean I will harass him in other threads or ignore his direct questions.

It does mean I am far more likely to ignore his OPs rather than take time to read. It does mean I would probably not bother myself to defend him. These are small and personnel things. It does not hurt Liberal that I feel this way.

I do not know if it helps but I almost 0 esteem for BC and little respect.

Jim

Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t logical necessity entail that a thing be true in all possible worlds? Kinda kicks your objection to a parallel worlds view to the kerb, doesn’t it?

What a refreshing breath of reason! Kudos to you, Dr. D! I was starting to wonder whether this was such a great board after all. The level of venom and the amount of piling-on is pretty depressing.

Then for christ’s sake, fuck off to MPSIMS. :wink:

Yeah, what the hell are you doing here, you hothouse fuckwit?

Very well. To the redoubtable Jodi nee h:

Having always held your posts in the highest esteem, and having resolved to click on any link to a SDMB thread that I find you have posted, I humbly request that you consider implementing the following tip into your coding.

When you wish to cite a specific post, it is possible to paste the URL of that post directly into your link. Doing this is a simple process. All you need to do is click on the post number that appears just to the left of the “Report this Post” icon. That will cause a new window to open, containing just that post. The URL in the address bar is what you need to cut and paste into your post, to create a link fhat goes directly to the post in question.

I would consider it a kindness if you would do this, simply to make it easier for me to find the post you are citing. I recognize that you usually include the number of the post when you put up a link to the page, and I appreciate that. However, I will point out that this suggestion saves you the trouble of doing that.

Thank you for your time. Fiat justitia.

The people in this thread would like Liberal to agree to disagree with prr. A few posters will not agree to disagree until that happens.

You don’t say! Let me try it: kaylasdad99’s post shoud appear here.

Huh! Handy feature. Although sometimes I don’t like the one-post-only links because they don’t give you context for the post. But very handy nonetheless. Thank you. Fiat 99’ers!

I disagree.