The boombox is a nice touch.
Word. A friend of mine with a tall kid took to remarking loudly “And she’s only two (or three)” whenever her child’s self control didn’t match her apparent age.
[Moderating]
isosleepy, adding editorial comments to a quote box, when quoting another poster, is a violation of the board rules. Please avoid doing this in the future.
No warning issued.
[/Moderating]
If I had started to act like that in a store as a kid, either of my parents would’ve taken me out to the car until I settled down. Granted, I knew better, because I knew it wouldn’t work. If it was at home, they usually went in the other room until I tired myself out. The only thing I ever ended up getting was a bad headache.
IF said story actually happened, the best thing to do is let the kid cry himself out. It’s possible that was what the mother was doing – not giving the kid the attention he wanted. She probably wanted you to stay out of it, since it probably would make it worse. Which it did.
If, of course, it actually happened.

Sadly, I’ve never had a face that could shock a child into sudden calm. Babies in supermarkets do seem to stare at me in slack-jawed awe. Could be the beard.
Eh, my dad has one. Not like the one Scylla described, mind you, but when he gets mad, he just gets this LOOK on his face, that always compelled me to behave. Just because I knew then that I was in deep shit. (No, he never hit me or anything, but when he got mad, he just LOOKED so fucking scary!)
My dad’s also six-three, and he just looks really intimidating. And he’s got that old-fashioned Irish temper, so he’ll just start yelling. Which I inherited.

IF said story actually happened, the best thing to do is let the kid cry himself out. It’s possible that was what the mother was doing – not giving the kid the attention he wanted. She probably wanted you to stay out of it, since it probably would make it worse. Which it did.
If, of course, it actually happened.
I take literary license. My snarky comment benefitted from post facto editing. It is possible, barely possible that there might be some small hyperbole in the description of the qualities of my sneer.

[Moderating]
isosleepy, adding editorial comments to a quote box, when quoting another poster, is a violation of the board rules. Please avoid doing this in the future.No warning issued.
[/Moderating]
Begbert did use the phrase “Our Hero”- it wasn’t added.

I take literary license.
Many writers do, often to delightful comic effect.
The trick is to amuse readers without giving the impression that you are chortling to yourself as you write, “Move over, Dave Barry, everyone who reads this will be in awe of my extraordinary writing skill. Damn, I am uniquely hilarious, if I do say so myself. It’s already a knee-slapper, but I think I shall lovingly polish this essay a bit more, to earn even greater admiration from my adoring readers.”
There will never be universal agreement on what constitutes effortless humor and what smacks of authorial preening. You do have a fan club, no question. For others, your style is irritating. Perhaps that irritation contributes to the poor reception you’re getting.

Begbert did use the phrase “Our Hero”- it wasn’t added.
But “Summary not full of lies:” was.

But “Summary not full of lies:” was.
I know this isn’t ATMB, but “Summary not full of lies” was in begbert2’s original quote.

The difference here is that when he didn’t get your praise, he responded in a graceful, calm, and witty way.
You, on the other hand, came in here and shat your pants. As the forum intends for you to do, of course, but you can’t say you want me to be impressed.
Summary not full of lies:
Woman has two kids. One of the kids is screaming about wanting an item, which the mother seems to have foolishly let the kid take off the shelf and carry with him. Or maybe she didn’t notice - the level of attention she seems to be paying is very low. (Wonder what would have happened at the register.)
Kid for some reason decides to direct his demands to Our Hero, apparently on the delusion that Our Hero will buy the thing for him. No reaction from mom. Our Hero, though, does react, by making a face and saying “No.” Hearing “no”, the kid promptly melts down.
The mother reacts to something - she very politely chastises our hero for saying “No”. Our Hero is markedly less polite back to her, then turns away.
The kid (having suddenly recovered from his meltdown, because like 90% of all kid meltdowns it was just an act) teleports in front of Our Hero and repeats his demand, apparently bolstered by the fact his mom apparently disproves of other people refusing to give him things.
Our Hero repeats his “No.” The kid repeats his (faux) meltdown. Our Hero doesn’t stick around to see if the mom wants to play the repeat game too.

I know this isn’t ATMB, but “Summary not full of lies” was in begbert2’s original quote.
Damn, you’re right.
[Moderation]
Note rescinded. My apologies for the error.
[/Moderation]

Just enjoy the story for what it is; an attempt at an amusing anecdote.
The writing is too overworked to be amusing, (but I guess it was an honest try).
Maybe if he’d actually snatched candy from the child?
What do you know. This is today’s Calvin and Hobbes.

Well…
I acted the same way to my children when they threw tantrums. I ridiculed them and laughed at them theatrically.
I let them know that not only did their tantrum not upset or coerce me, but that I found it humorous, while making it clear that it was never going to get them anything.
You have license to parent your kids however you want. Treating other people’s kids like you do your own is not going to earn you attaboys. It will earn you requests to stop, just as that mother did.
I don’t think anything in this world is more alarming than the cry of a child in actual distress. I, and I think most adults are programmed to respond to it automatically.
So you should understand the mother’s perspective when she saw a big strange man leaning into her child’s face, sneering and speaking to him in a way to cause him to collapse on the floor, crying. It’s the type of scene that doesn’t lend itself to only the most innocuous interpretations. Even still, she handled it calmly.
The woman failed to correct her child when he was attempting his tantrum on me. As I wrote in the thread she actually moved a little past me and seemed to be pointedly ignoring it.
I thought that was bad parenting, and I think it I’ll-advised that she would put her child in a position where it might get corrected by a total stranger. Irresponsible.
Again, “correction” is not getting down into a kid’s face and trying to make him feel bad. If all you’d said was no, this thread wouldn’t exist. And neither would yours (because you wouldn’t have the opportunity to regale us with details about your douchey sneer).
My response to her was too rude and snarky, but she too me by surprise by being polite and soft spoken in her objection. It wasn’t what I was expecting.
See, I don’t get this part. She was so polite and soft spoken when she asked you to stop messing with her kid, so that gave you license to double down on rudeness? WTH? See this as a sign of walking around with too much aggression. It sounds like you were looking for a fight.

Eh, the brat’s obviously a lost cause. Definite future libtard, with his “gimme gimme gimme,” expecting everything to be handed to him rather than take the initiative to beat up a smaller kid and take his lunchbox.
Perfect.

Many writers do, often to delightful comic effect.
The trick is to amuse readers without giving the impression that you are chortling to yourself as you write, “Move over, Dave Barry, everyone who reads this will be in awe of my extraordinary writing skill. Damn, I am uniquely hilarious, if I do say so myself. It’s already a knee-slapper, but I think I shall lovingly polish this essay a bit more, to earn even greater admiration from my adoring readers.”
That is exactly the way I think!
There will never be universal agreement on what constitutes effortless humor and what smacks of authorial preening. You do have a fan club, no question. For others, your style is irritating. Perhaps that irritation contributes to the poor reception you’re getting.
Perhaps. If I don’t particularly enjoy a story or the way it’s written I just stop reading. I don’t find it necessary to shit on the author because his style grates on me personally. The idea that those that do seem to dislike my style of writing would indicate that I am offensive to assholes. I find that appealing.
As appealing as it is, I doubt that’s the case. I think that the internet has evolved and this board with it. The result being that this board holds an unusual concentration of what I call “Woke Scolds.” These are just shitheads who get their jollies by going around virtue signaling by pointing out perceived flaws in others’ thinking or word choice and presenting those as indicative of deep character flaws. It’s character assassination disguised as social justice. Though I don’t post on twitter there’s an especially lot of it there, as well. I despise them, as they seem to get off on trying to make other people feel bad, and are generally humorless assholes.

Perfect.
(I should clarify that I think VT’s comment doesn’t really belong in this thread; and, my appreciation of it has nothing to with political leanings of Scylla it anyone else in this thread, of which I know nothing).

As appealing as it is, I doubt that’s the case. I think that the internet has evolved and this board with it. The result being that this board holds an unusual concentration of what I call “Woke Scolds.” These are just shitheads who get their jollies by going around virtue signaling by pointing out perceived flaws in others’ thinking or word choice and presenting those as indicative of deep character flaws. It’s character assassination disguised as social justice. Though I don’t post on twitter there’s an especially lot of it there, as well. I despise them, as they seem to get off on trying to make other people feel bad, and are generally humorless assholes.
Nah, I’ve been parenting before the internet was a thing, and found attitudes and stories like yours depressing for their lack of human empathy and self-serving nonsense.
What the internet has done is emboldened people to think that a lack of compassion and stories of humiliating other people is fodder for readers amusement.
I think it’s possible that Scylla’s harsh attitude towards the stranger’s child in a public place is related to his continued frustration and anger at himself for being so incredibly wrong about the history of last year’s government shutdown in a thread earlier in the summer, blaming the Democrats when the Democrats actually passed a funding bill that was previously supported unanimously by all Republicans and Democrats in the Senate. And he wasn’t just wrong – he was so wrong he couldn’t acknowledge or even accept it, instead refusing to address it at all.
But it’s okay, Scylla. It’s okay to be wrong sometimes. It’s not really that big a deal, and it doesn’t have to cause months of anger and frustration that explode onto an unsuspecting child in a public place. I’ve been wrong too. You’re gonna be okay!
Just a possibility, anyway.

These are just shitheads who get their jollies by going around virtue signaling by pointing out perceived flaws in others’ thinking or word choice and presenting those as indicative of deep character flaws. It’s character assassination disguised as social justice.
Perhaps. I on the other hand have no issue with your writing style - I rather fondly remember “the horror of blimps” for example. I had trouble with the substance of the particular post. You were judge, jury and executioner of a women and her misbehaving child, knowing exactly nothing about her, her kid, what did or didn’t happen before they came into the store, the home they go back to - any of it. But you decided to make her day a little worse regardless. And you were obviously proud of it.
If I had a stylistic criticism it would be how you didn’t finish the story, which ideally would have incorporated elements such as wearing Underoos over your pants and a large flowing cape over your shoulders depicting a decapitated Barney bleeding profusely from his neck, as an outfit in which you go around making Target safe for - well not sure for whom, but by Jove you’re doing something.