How about a cite for your latest laptop lie?
What was my lie again? That there were things of significance on the laptop? I think I’ll stick by that, thanks.
And I’m not getting sucked into the gish-galloping nonsense trying to divert away from your original ridiculous assertion that there was absolutely nothing of significance on the laptop.
Will you admit that you were wrong about that? Or will you just keep inventing creative new definitions for ‘significant’?
No, it was your assertion that the “things” were significant by definition since they were being used in multiple Federal cases. You were asked for cites that the photos (or anything from the laptop) were elements in any Federal case.
And I’ll repeat, it would be really sad if you reference the House investigation.
I enjoy people calling me a liar and other names with no rebuttal even less.
Hey, do you want to prove whether I enjoy this or not? Stop pitting me. When I’m not being dragged through the pit this board is much calmer, because I never start this shit, because I really don’t enjoy it.
The first 15 years or so that I was here I think I got pitted maybe once or twice. Now it’s every freaking day. And then people cry that they want me gone because it’s just SO distracting. Here’s a hint: Stop hitting yourself. You stop picking fights with me, and there won’t be any fighting. Because I don’t start this stuff. I’m just trying to enjoy socializing like everyone else.
There are people on this board doing their best to ‘deplatform’ any voices critical of Democrats. They repeat the party line as fact, call you a liar if you don’t agree, pile on in pit threads, etc. If they succeed on getting me off this board, the next most conservative poster will become the target. And they’ll continue until this board no longer has an ‘problematic’ opinions.
There’s a lot to unpack there, but I definitely love the claim that the tone of the entire board hinges on how mean people are being to Sam at any given moment.
Bullshit. Do you think this is hard to find?
That last one is the earliest I found without spending more than 30 seconds poking around, but I found it amusing that he was pitted for literally the exact same thing as always.
Stop lying all the time, and the amount of time you get pitted will go waaaaay down.
That’s wrong, but perhaps it’s not a lie if you think dick pics and drug use by a publicly known drug user are “significant” (and apparently you do, but you do you).
The lie is that multiple federal cases are using evidence from the laptop. You haven’t even tried to support that one.
You know, there’s a real easy fix for that. Stop lying.
Here you go:
You’ll find Hunter’s laptopp referenced multiple times in multiple documents.
For example:
There is no proof of guilt here, especially for Joe Biden. What there is, however, is evidence warranting an investigation. That makes the laptop significant.
This is just one document. There are many,
I also showed that material from the laptop was entered as evidence in the gun charge case.
Again, the proposition I am refuting is that ‘absolutely nothing of significance’ was on the laptop. The fact that multiple pieces of evidence from the laptop are being used in multiple investigations is all I need to demonstrate to show that the laptop was significant.
Let’s cut to the chase. Tell me what you think my worst lie is. Let’s not debate vague ‘patterns of lies’. Give me the worst one.
Just for the sake of completionism, you missed a couple.
Now that first one is from 2018, so I don’t know if it counts as part of the Dope’s honeymoon period where he only got pitted seven or eight times, or if it’s in our “We Suddenly Have a Problem With Sam Even Though We’ve Always Had a Problem With Sam” phase.
That’s not “multiple federal cases”, that’s the entirely dishonest, repeatedly lying GOP House committee sham investigation (which isn’t even a single “federal case”). Repeating someone else’s lie is still a lie, and you’ve repeated their lies over and over again. And over and over again, we’ve shown those lies to be lies with clear cites. The GOP House committee has gathered a bunch of documents and then lied publicly about them, over and over again. The documents don’t say what they say they do, despite your repeating their lies.
So your “multiple federal cases” remains a lie.
Okay, six times. It’s been a long time. Whatever. I get pitted every day now.
Now I suppose you’ll spend an hour researching to find a day that I wasn’t pitted so you can call me a liar.
So many to choose from, hmm, what a tough question. Oh wait, no, the answer is pretty obvious. It’s your constant lying by claiming that you’ve never lied.
The lie that sticks out in my mind is how you promised to come back to the silly Trump tweet thread and say “I’m a big weenie” if it turns out Trump’s poop-tweet about declassifying documents turned out to be nothing. You never did come back and fulfill your promise… because it was a lie.
And a pretty silly thing to lie about! I think only someone who has no problem lying all the time would lie about something so silly.
You don’t get to decide that the freaking House Oversight Committee is just a bunch of liars and don’t count for anything.
The fact is, that’s a federal investigation. The gun charge is a federal investigation. Both refer to evidence from the laptop.
You are the one who is obviously lying here. Stop it.
Yeah, I tried, without much hope, to head off that feeble response.