A Thread for the Mueller Investigation Results and Outcomes (Part 1)

Mademoiselle Rimbaud: Your Majesty! I was raised in a convent!
Am I the only one who heard that in Mel Brooks’ King Louis XVI voice? :confused: :stuck_out_tongue:

Sam Nunberg backs down… like, all the way down.

Best part may not have been there before: “CORRECTION: This story originally misidentified the person Numberg referred to as a moron.”

Slow. Motion.* Fun.

** - now with Real-Time Motion!*

I actually heard it as I was typing it in Eddie Izzard’s “Cake or death?” voice…

Cake or death is a MUCH easier question, though…

The Nunberg interview with Ari Melber of MSNBC

Maybe this message got through to him in time after all…

The floor tilts downward away from his edge of the table. Notice the guy to his right is grabbing the tabletop so his chair doesn’t roll away.

Ahem.

“twitterrhea.” Neologisms are fine, but let us observe the proper forms.

That is all.

I thought it was just coming from my home state, Ahia.

Once again, hope triumphs over experience.

Worst sobering up period ever.

First time I ever remember an interviewer telling a guest that she smelled alcohol on his breath. Just curious- why does he have to go through all those emails? Why not just surrender his passwords and let the Mueller team do the searching?

He came to this conclusion as well during his interview on MSNBC.

No. No, you were not.

It’s not that it’s hard to produce emails. I’m sure he’s been given instructions on exactly the easiest way to search and produce them. He just knows there are emails in there that are damning and he’s trying to avoid hanging his mentor Roger Stone out to dry.

This guy went to law school?!?! I think the worst of the “I didn’t go to law school but let me expound on how I think the law should work” armchair lawyers of the SDMB are more knowledgeable than this guy.

Nunberg sounds (to me) indistinguishable from Sassy Trump.

It’s just a generally good idea to not give additional ammunition when not necessary. Who knows, maybe there’s an email in there that says “Hey, wasn’t beating the shit out of that prostitute on Tuesday fun?” Not related to the matter at hand, but certainly trouble.

Generally, in litigation, you review the documents to remove privileged (attorney-client) info and non-responsive proprietary info. In this case, it would be to remove anything unrelated that’s potentially incriminatory.