I’ve pointed out earlier that I’ve never claimed or even implied that Mueller had nothing. If you can find something, in many posts I’ve posted on the subject, which suggests that Mueller had nothing and was just picking people out of a phone book or the like, then you could make some claim to intellectual honesty. But you can’t, and are just taking a cheap shot.
Not that you stand out in this regard from the majority of posters to these threads. But I had thought you were a cut above the rabble. I guess not.
As a lawyer you would undoubtedly know that there’s a huge gap and middle ground between having no evidence at all and having enough evidence to go to trial and convict. So saying a prosecutor was not prepared to go to trial because they didn’t expect to need to do that, and that their indictment therefore “may have been something of a PR stunt” is not at all the same as saying there was no evidence at all and that the defendants had been randomly chosen based on nothing at all.
Well, it’s been widely speculated that Cohen hadn’t been doing much of anything in the “lawyering” category–just in the “fixer” category, which isn’t subject to attorney-client privilege. So this makes sense.
Little Mikey knows a ton about what little Donny has been up to. And plenty of that knowledge will be reflected in those piles of documents.
How many crimes?
And in what words will Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan say “those crimes don’t matter”…???
If you want to get pedantic, and the defenders will, it is legal for the President to declassify anything. The Secretary of State doesn’t have that authority.
If someone argues that, they would have to not care about giving away sensitive information, only that the letter of the law is followed.
Of course, nobody should try to actually hack into his accounts. I would imagine that if you succeeded, you would be caught and prosecuted. You might even be caught if you try.