Will Farnaby wrote: “Yes and proper libertarianism is anarchism.” I guess as long as you’re the one defining propriety. But seriously, clowns like this (I’m talking Jones now again have been around forever. I remember Joe Pyne back in the sixties and there was a slew of similar guys on the local and national scene. But it does seem to me that more folks are taking them seriously these days.
If libeterianism and anarchism were the same thing, they wouldn’t have two different terms. Even the strongest libertarianism believes in the usefulness of a state, while anarchism thinks that we don’t even need that.
Neither work out practically, as people will always find a way to having power over others. Maybe in a small community, you can enforce the ideals somewhat, but it fails as soon as there’s someone who wants to take advantage.
Not that any of this has to do with Infowars or Alex Jones. He does not support either philosophy, or really anything coherent. He’s just pushing incompatible conspiracy theories.
Alex Jones claims to be, or has claimed to be a libeterian.
Of course libertarians are just delusional about their supposed self sufficiency and want to have the benefits of society for free.
Don’t leave us hanging. Which ones are you talking about?
Sparta, right? You saw The 300 and thought “This is Sparta!”
Jones’s lawyer is trying to get the judge to release to the public the addresses and birthdates of the Sandy Hook victims’ parents.
Well, I’m not so much trying to edify you, on account of the fact that you’re dumber than a pat of low-salt butter. But I do consider it an interesting thought to ponder whether Alex Jones (not you) (presuming you’re not Alex Jones) would personally qualify as a terrorist, by the normal definition of the term. Is a person who deliberately incites terrorists to violence a terrorist?
Not really, dipshit.
I wish you folks would learn to spell that word right. It starts with a “g” – an easy mistake, since those types tend to leave it off.
Gdipshit? Gterrorist? What gword are we gtalking about here, gexactly? 
Gibertarian.
Gohhhhh, “gibertarion”; gright.
G:D
Geatalt. NOT jestalt.
Morans.
Hey - beats that Elections thread with all that talk about Klugman.
I think WillF is just talking to himself.
Hey, we were going through Kansas a number of years ago, at a time when the R candidate for US Senate was Jerry Moran. So, you see all these signs all over the place that say “Moran”, along with some smaller print that you would fail to notice/read. It was a bit unnerving.
I like to give everyone the benefit of the doubt, so how much time do you need to come up with the information? Since you were so confident in your assertion, I’d expected you to have it memorized. And I’d love to know that because I don’t know any historical example that fits your criteria.
Yes, because capitalism can’t exist in an anarchy. You’re the one who said you wanted anarchy, and that’s what Somalia is. The result of being pro-anarchy is that you’re opposed to capitalism (among many other things).
What is capitalism?
Don’t even bother.
I didn’t want to start a whole new thread for this, so I’m just going to drop these in here:
From January: Families of Sandy Hook victims score victory in lawsuit against Alex Jones, Infowars
And yesterday: Judge rules Sandy Hook families can depose Alex Jones in defamation case
Sweet!
Is this where Jones tries out his defense of “I’m just an entertainer! You can’t believe my actual words! It was a joke! You people have no sense of humor!”