Actually, the precise wording of the question used in his definition did not include receiving oral sex (though it did include giving it). Receiving oral sex had actually been crossed out in the definition. Being the lawyer that he was, he saw the loophole and he took it it. No perjury.
It’s adultery.
What aisle is that on in the supermarket?
Depends on the grocery store, but it’s usually between the Kleenex and the home pregnancy tests.
Why is a blow job sex/adultery but not a hand job? What is the substantive difference there? It sounds completely arbitrary to me.
I can tell you this, if I was to get a handjob from another woman, my wife would call it adultery and my marriage would be over.
This is the most sensible thing anyone has said in two pages.
At the same time, I do agree that Rekers probably has a habit of using legalism to participate in Gay Sexual Behavior* (hereinafter “GSB”), while deluding himself that he is not gay, and is not participating in “gay sex.”
*Including but not limited to watching gay porn or watching men undress and/or masturbate and thereby experiencing sexual arousal and/or gratification, receiving massages from men while one or both participants are nude, giving and/or receiving manual genital stimulation with another man, engaging in penetrative or receptive oral sex with a man, and engaging in penetrative or receptive anal sex with a man.
There, was I specific enough? 
Orificial insertion.
What if your wife found out you were having cybersex or masturbating to porn twice daily- would that be adultery? What about a French kiss with another person? None of these would be defined as actual sex but would probably upset her quite a bit also.
This is significant how? How is it substantively different from a handjob?
Cybersex, yes. Kissing yes. Jerking off to porn does not involve another person, so no.
So I take it you wouldn’t mind if I borrow your wife for handjobs and assorted seminal discharges not involving penetration?
Lemme me know when you’re in town.
Kewl. 
So lesbians, who for political reasons, eschew penetration (people do weird things, this is one of them) don’t have sex?
Band name!
Joe Jervis of Joe.My.God managed to get the escort, Jo-Vanni Roman, to answer some questions in a phone interview. I love the part at the end where he says, “Well, I do have to get up early for an interview. You know that guy, the gay reporter on TV?” He’ll be interviewed for Anderson Cooper’s show tomorrow. I guess he’s getting the hang of outing people.
So, if he sucked on Reker’s fingers during the massage: sex or no sex?
My personal definition of sex: activities that are directly intended to lead to orgasm, whether that is actually reached or not. Handjob? Yes. Kissing? No, but possibly adulterous. Oral? Hells yeah.
And if I were married to somebody who got a handjob from anybody else, male or female, that marriage would be over. Because that’s sex in my book.
This. And that includes phone/cyber sex and frottage.
It’s a red light special.
Outing Anderson Closet is like outing Ricky Martin. We all know, we’re just being polite and not telling him that we know.
Earlier I had specified penile-orificial insertion.
I wonder if it makes him nervous when he does gay themed stories- especially those that deal with being outed in the media. True, he’s not a homophobe, and he’s not really closeted (i.e. he doesn’t deny being gay, he just doesn’t speak about his private life) but it still has to be a tad uncomfortable.
I guess you meant to imply something like “they apparently didn’t have what I would call sex”, but you didn’t express it very clearly.
My wife wouldn’t call it adultery, but my marriage would be over.