So says the New York Post
Here is the thread about his weiner photos.
What is with this guy?
So what?
+1
Would that necessitate a runoff erection?
…Yeah I don’t get the issue here. It this now gay-baiting?
I think he enjoys sex. This happened before he got caught, so at least he was not dumb enough to go doing this again.
Seriously . . . you believe something because you read it in the New York Post? I’m not saying it’s not true, but if that’s your only source, it’s just one small step above the Enquirer.
And even if it is true . . . so what?
It’s not gay if it’s a 3-way. (Link to SNL Digital Short)
“The New York Post: The paper for people who like to read fast, or have to read slow!”
He was just very patriotic.
Say that in a Asian accent and its even better.
Let’s bear in mind that whatever consenting adults choose to do in the privacy of their own homes is nobody’s business besides Rupert Murdoch’s.
Put me down for another “who cares?” and “the Post? REALLY?!”
+2
:rolleyes:
You can do a three way, two guys and a girl and never have the guys near each other. Or am I the only one who has ever seen a porno movie 
Woo.
Hoo.
Anthony Weiners?
(Somebody had to!)
I never did understand the “scandal” around Weiner(tee hee) as far as I know he wasn’t some bible thumper screeching about how loose morals and fornication was ruining America, so who cares besides his wife? I actually laughed out loud that one photo published in the press was a picture of his bare chest(before the dick pics) how scandalous a man’s exposed breasts!!
I mean if you have a hypocrite politician out there trying to limit freedoms because the gays are evil scum and you have pics of him with a rent boy by all means go public as it has the potential to make people’s lives better.
Otherwise its grown man has sexual urges/fantasies, film at 11.
As a straight woman, I resent the OP’s effort to discourage 2 men/1 woman 3-ways.
This is terrible news for his Congressional career.
It isn’t gay if your balls happen to rub against each other, is it?