Oh good grief.
Let’s see, she’s had a miscarriage and two terminations, so I’d say if she’s not up for another, that’s her choice. Although I would like to hit the bootee people upside the head with a large stick. Talk about emotional blackmail!
She has horrible family experience with adoption, both of giving away a baby and of a reunion that did not turn out well. Despite lovely stories of happy adoptive families, open adoptions and well-adjusted kids, that just doesn’t fit with her experience. All she knows about adoption is that her mother was wracked with guilt and that her half brother was adopted by horrible people and turned out to be a loser.
What she has is a mother who loves her unconditionally, to the point of co-dependence. For someone like her, keeping her baby with a " blood family who care about it" will be all that matters.
Sampiro I agree with you that adoption is the best idea for the baby and for her, but I honestly don’t think that anything anyone says will change her mind. Using emotional blackmail, railroading her into it etc are not good ideas. If she can’t make a rational, measured choice for adoption she won’t be able to cope with the emotional aftermath.
In the meantime, aren’t social services there to help? Can’t she get government housing? Financial benefits as a single mother? Food stamps? Free antenatal care? Parenting classes? Something?
If there was a woman in that situation here, the social workers would have her in her own council flat, with doctor’s appointments and parenting classes arranged ASAP, and she would be entitled to extra benefits (welfare) on account of being a single mother.
Involving Social Services needn’t mean that the baby gets taken from her, but it might mean that they can offer her help and education. Raising a baby on welfare isn’t ideal, but it’s got to be better than raising one on nothing.
cerberus- FYI, hormonal contraceptives cannot be used in pregnant women.