Reading one of Schott’s Miscellanies where he says the poet William Shenstone (1714-1765) once claimed that if the general public was divided into one hundred parts, the relative distribution of intellect could be estimated this:
Fools 15%, Persons of Common Sense 40%, Wits 15%, Nitpickers 15%, Persons of Wild Taste 10%, Persons of Elevated Taste 5%.
These numbers seem way off. What numbers would you choose? How would you alternately distribute the general public into percent?
I also do not think taste and intellect should be on the same axis. And if you added up all the percentages to confirm a correct total, should it be assumed you pick nits?
I suspect standards have changed in 250 years. I think there are now more than 15% fools, and fewer nitpickers and higher. I think 40% common sense is probably about right.
Those who arbitrarily divide people into groups: 25%
Those who do not arbitrarily divide people into groups: 65%
Those who prefer arguing about whether dividing people into groups is arbitrary: 10%
There are different categories of people:
People who divide people into different categories of people: 50%
People who don’t divide people into different categories of people: 49.9%
And the poet William Shenstone: 0.1%, (because he’s dead)