Are guys who are tall and skinny more likely to be jerks?

The BBQ Pit
101

[QUOTE=Bearflag70]
I have found that if you participate in a thread that gets moved to the Pit, and that move is likely to permit flaming or piling on you, then simply abandon the thread immediately and save yourself the headache. Just leave and never open it again.
[/QUOTE]

Is anyone actually still flaming Argent? I think the tenor of the thread had taken a jocular turn.

(Yeah, I rewrote that last sentence in order to include the word ‘jocular’ in it specifically. Some words should be used more)

102

The last time I did a jocular turn, I strained my groin muscles.

103

[QUOTE=Boozahol Squid, P.I.]
Is anyone actually still flaming Argent? I think the tenor of the thread had taken a jocular turn.

(Yeah, I rewrote that last sentence in order to include the word ‘jocular’ in it specifically. Some words should be used more)
[/QUOTE]

I guess not, but people were still talking about the propriety of mods moving threads to the Pit just so the mod can start a pile-on.

104

[QUOTE=Boozahol Squid, P.I.]
(Yeah, I rewrote that last sentence in order to include the word ‘jocular’ in it specifically. Some words should be used more)
[/QUOTE]

Indubitably.

105

[QUOTE=Siam Sam]
[color=purple]Indubitably.
[/QUOTE]

This post has been graped.[/color]

106

This post has been covered in yak come.

107

107th!!!111!!eleven

108

[QUOTE=Cisco]
Honest question: I’d like to know if there is precedent for an OP asking to have their thread closed and being told no. I’ve been around here for awhile, as you can see, and I have never seen this happen. Quite the opposite, I’ve seen plenty of instances of the OP vaguely suggesting a thread might be better off closed, then changing his/her mind and continuing with the discussion, and a mod comes along and locks it anyway.
[/QUOTE]

Happens fairly often in GQ too. (Actually, the poster may not be told “no” directly, but the thread is allowed to stay open despite the request.) We don’t necessarily close a thread just because a poster doesn’t like the responses it’s getting.

109

[QUOTE=msmith537]
If it’s any consolation, my sophomore roomate was 6’x" and like a hundred and nothing and he was a whinny spoiled prick.
[/QUOTE]

Didn’t it leave him a little …* horse*?

110

I’ve noticed that when an OP requests a thread be closed, it is almost always granted if the discussion has basically been had already (in that thread). I haven’t noticed people getting their threads closed because they made an error in judgement and wanted to take it back. Sort of a “laid is played” rule, if you will.

111

[QUOTE=Argent Towers]
Trust me, I stopped taking this thread seriously a long time ago. I wasn’t intending to be serious with my last post either, it was just a joke. Come on, you really think I only trust people within some narrow height range?

Anyway, I do have to question the impartiality of Giraffe here.
[/QUOTE]

Well, DUH. How could he be impartial? You’re dissing TALL, SKINNY MALES–the definition of a GIRAFFE. Jeez. I’d have thought you’d have figured that out by now. :dubious: :wink:
I agree that short guys are more dickish (and not in a good way) than taller guys. I have yet to meet a short doctor who didn’t have a god complex or even a short businessman, ditto. I believe it’s called overcompensating.
But when I can look eye to eye with you and you swear you’re 5’10 and I know I’m 5’7", I’m going to think you’re an insecure dick. Just sayin’.

112

[QUOTE=Argent Towers]
Trust me, I stopped taking this thread seriously a long time ago. I wasn’t intending to be serious with my last post either, it was just a joke. Come on, you really think I only trust people within some narrow height range?

Anyway, I do have to question the impartiality of Giraffe here.
[/QUOTE]

OK, how tall are you? For some reason I recall reading someplace that you’re on the very tall side, like 6’4" or something?

And FTR, I don’t think you’re a jerk. That might make some people here think I am a jerk, but I’m only 5’8", so I’m not worried about it :slight_smile:

113

[QUOTE=FinnAgain]
And yet, directly flaming large numbers of Dopers is perfectly legal in GD.

Posters can say, for instance, that conservatives enjoy killing innocent people,

Or come right out and say:
[

Or:

[url=http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=9844612&postcount=67]](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=9844468&postcount=64):

In fact, that particularly vile poster who habitually flames other Dopers in GD, and gets away with it, received something of a complement rather than being modded, because he was “honest” enough to say that his flames were his opinion.

So come on. No, this thread didn’t have to be moved. And no, it certainly didn’t have to remain open for a Pit-type pile on if its OP didn’t intend for it to be that sort of a thread. Don’t act if if the SDMB has actual rules that the mods actually consistently follow, and use that fabrication as a justification.

You can’t pretend that we have anything other than a makebelieve rule that says ascribing ‘negative personality traits’ to people belongs in the Pit, when GD mods routinely allow overt flaming.

A mod, subjectively, felt like moving this thread. So he did. There is no actual rule against flaming, let alone talking about “negative personality traits”, and you shouldn’t pretend that there is.
A mod wanted to do something, a mod did it.
That’s all there is to it.
Don’t dress the pig up and pretend it’s a ballerina.
[/QUOTE]

Oh, come on, it’s Der Trihs we’re talking about. Seriously, you can’t hold that against the mods. If they didn’t let Der Trihs post that crap here, he’d just go surf so much goat rape porn that he’d hog up all the bandwidth and break teh internetz. Or worse, he’d go out and start learning how to talk to girls and wind up having children. We’re trying to keep the child autistic rate down, Finn!!

114

Oh, and as far as the OP is concerned, I have to second whoever said that the real assholes I’ve run into have tended to be the short skinny guys. Serious Little Man’s Disease going on. Most tall skinny guys I’ve met have been OK, although the basketball players could be a little cocky when they wanted to.

115

I’m exactly average height - about 5’9

ETA: I guess the average height for men in America is actually 5’10

116

[QUOTE=Linty Fresh]
Or worse, he’d go out and start learning how to talk to girls and wind up having children.
[/QUOTE]

Yeah, that part was just over the top, broke my suspension of disbelief.

117

There’s absolutely precedent for not closing threads upon request. Happens all the time in the Pit. Threads that have gone off the rails get closed, but the mods usually don’t lock threads to protect somebody from the fallout of their own remarks.

As far as modding and posting in the same thread goes… we try not to. Sometimes you’re participating in a thread and somebody steps over the line and you have to put the mod hat on, and it can’t be avoided.

That said, I think a situation like this calls for a paraphrase of Churchill:

“Today I am short, tomorrow I may be tall. Argent Towers will still be a twit.” :stuck_out_tongue:

118

[QUOTE=FinnAgain]
Yeah, that part was just over the top, broke my suspension of disbelief.
[/QUOTE]

Why, it could happen! There’s lots of time. He’s only, let’s see . . . 40 years old . . .

OK, I see your point.

119

Oh, and this thread was going to be moved to the Pit no matter who found it. No way was it going to stay in IMHO.

120

[QUOTE=Linty Fresh]
Why, it could happen! There’s lots of time. He’s only, let’s see . . . 40 years old . . .

OK, I see your point.
[/QUOTE]

Holy shit.
At first, I thought you were joking and riffing on the ‘40 year old virgin’ movie. I’d never checked out his birth date in his user info. Up until now, I’ve always thought that he was either an old HS student or a college freshman/sophomore who still had a lot of rage left over from his days in public school.
Mother of mercy, he really is 40.

I tell you, the SDMB does more to shake my faith in humanity than going to Walmart, sometimes.