pugluvr:
I meet all of your criteria.
But…
I wouldn’t say that I don’t “relate well” to other women, although the fact remains that I have a large cadre of male friends (and always have).
I have several very significant female friends, all of which could easily be defined as “best friends”. We are very close. Nothing is taboo for discussion, or experience. And since you were wondering, nope, I’m not a lesbian
At least not at present
I think that my girlfriends too, however, would meet your criteria.
I’ve never become close friends with any women who are interested in the things on your list, for obvious reasons. We have little in common. I find these things particularly uninteresting, and discussion of them, or participation with them, annoying.
I don’t mean to imply that women of this ilk are by nature annoying, but as they are preoccupied with things that don’t interest me, I don’t find myself engaged in discussion with them. I tend to avoid it.
And this in itself may be my failing. Due to my disinterest in their topics of “everyday small-talk”, I’m sure I’ve missed out on the opportunity to get to know the person underlying the “social shell”.
I’ve often wondered, while staring at the magazines targeted toward women at supermarket checkout lanes, “Who buys this stuff? Who reads this stuff?” Apparently, many women do.
I feel that the answer to this question can be directly related to “mass appeal”. Duh! Of course. If it didn’t sell, it wouldn’t last, right?
The times, they are a-changin’, but the blasted archaic mass appeal realities promoted to sell products (magazines, tv shows, books, food, you-name-it), certainly make it difficult to escape the “sucker” mindset that just absorbs everything and doesn’t question whether different interests, realities, and roles even exist.
To clarify a bit further, I must point out that I’m not a radical feminist, or a radical anything, in the sense that I don’t identify myself with a single particular radical ideology, role, or drama. And no clubs of female separatists for me either…
I do, however, consider myself to be a free radical. I know that’s not good, if we’re talking about the body’s cellular structures, but my idea is somewhat similar, though on a social-political scale.
I blend in well - most of the time. I’m not after any sort of self-aggrandizing attention - I feel it would detract from my ability to relate to others, and poison my motives.
Sure, I went through the blue hair and weird clothes stage, but who hasn’t tested the effects of their appearance? I loved it, but, due to the need to make a living, and a choice not to be a “starving artist” or have my appearance detract from my message, I opted for the “natural look”. It took me years to finally acquiesce to wearing a bra every day, though 
Most importantly, I question and test everything - if not always externally, internally. I keep the dialog running, and don’t accept things at “face value” very often.
The free radical idea has to do with the fact that although I live in a city, and work at a “regular” job, I’m always tweaking the systems. I’m bumping up against oppressive ideologies, and the stultifying accepted social norms, every day. I’ve found that once I tweak a person or system’s reality, ever so slightly, they are forced to change. How they change is up to them. Whether or not my tweaking gets them to a better place, is up to them. Some people seem immune. And that’s cool, too. This doesn’t mean that I go around, day-to-day, with a goal of manipulating others. Far from it. In order to be “tweaked”, a person must be receptive to my input, and my motives must be pure.
The bottom line is that my motivation in social tweaking is, always, love. Nothing else. I actively look for the good in people. I look for the place where I can reach others. I believe that we are all in the same boat, but many of us have a perception that we are alone, tossed in the storm, and no one else can relate to our experiences, or help us if we need it. This just ain’t so. Not on a social level, a physical level, or a psychological level. And if you get down to the nitty-gritty of science, on an energy level, its really, really, not so. We’re all connected, whether we want to be or not.
My personal brand of “Social Tweaking” could be a word, or a look, a smile, or some such thing. It could be a kind deed, a discussion, a helping hand, or a refusal to “do it for” someone, when they are afraid they’ll fail. Its support, and active awareness. It could even be a message board post. It could be a refusal to back down, under threat of oppression, even though others are afraid to stand up for what they believe is right, or fight for the rights that they should be able to exercise, as unique and creative creatures of this amazing universe.
Over and over again, I’ve found that when I’m motivated by love, the universe responds in ways I never imagined. I’ve seen people, children, animals, plants, respond to love in ways which are truly transformational. And since you asked ;-), nope, I’m not a “new ager”, either.
My point is, that even the women who soak up all the mass appeal stuff we think is garbage, are more like us than we realize. Fragile human beings, who are fundamentally as alone as we are, and need to relate to others just as much as we do.
Their “veneer” prevents us from seeing them as they are, just as, I’m sure, my own “veneer” prevents others from seeing me as I am. But dammit! I try to crack my own veneer all the time!
Just as these women are sucked into the mass appeal vortex of “women’s interests”, I’m sure that I’m currently sucked into some mass appeal vortex or other. Its just not as readily apparent to me at this point, as it might be later on. If I can get the damn shackles off my consciousness long enough to see it. 
I’ll never forget the line, from the film “Apocalypse Now” (wait! that’s not a Chick Flick!):
“Its judgement, which defeats us”
I think that’s what is at work here, and I’m definitely not condemning you, or anyone else for “judging”. Hell, I do it all the time! Its how I decide what I like and what I don’t. But the key here is the idea that if we could just suspend our judgements, delay them a little while, we would have a much fuller perception of what we are experiencing, who we are meeting, and what we are really looking at. Then we can decide. Then we are approaching a level closer to freedom.
I don’t plan to race out the to the supermarket and strike up a conversation with the next woman who likes the things on your list.
But… maybe I should…
BTW, this wasn’t an intentional hijack attempt. You just got me thinkin’ 