Argent Towers, a moment, please.

The BBQ Pit
1

At 2:40pm EST yesterday, I posted this thread asking for microscope recommendations.

About two-and-a-half hours later, Argent Towers posted the exact same thread.

Don’t want to click the link? I’ll post our OP’s.

[QUOTE=Agent Foxtrot]
I want to buy a microscope. Preferably one that I can hook up to my computer and take digital pictures and video with. I’d prefer it be made of metal, but I wouldn’t pass on quality sturdy plastic. I don’t know if single-lens or dual-lens is better, but dual-lens always seemed to make my eyes all googly. Maybe I’m looking through it wrong. Oh, and I don’t want to spend a lot of money. Probably $100 at the most, and I’d probably go a little more if the Excalibur of microscopes presented itself to me.

I know we have a lot of science types on these boards. Can anyone recommend a good microscope for home use? Thanks.
[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Argent Towers]
I’d like to get a good microscope for looking at stuff. Preferably under $300. I don’t know anything about microscopes; there are a hell of a lot of them on eBay, that much I do know, but I need to be guided by someone who knows the different brands and which ones are good and which are crap. Could someone recommend me one? Let me know about different options (can it be connected to a computer? Can you capture screenshots from it with a program?)

Can you see sperm cells moving around, under a typical microscope?
[/QUOTE]
With a few variants, Argent Towers’ post sounds very much like mine.

Additionally, my thread so far has 0 replies. Argent Towers’ has 27. What gives, Dopers?

Maybe these threads are complete coincidence, but it doesn’t seem like it from here. The joke about Agent Foxtrot/Argent Towers having similar names is no longer funny. Any other time, Towers’ thread would’ve been closed since I already created a thread on the same subject. He could’ve just posted in my thread.

Seriously, what the fuck?

2

Well, for what it’s worth, I like you. :slight_smile:

3

I think it’s a genuine coincidence. I think Argent Foxtrot’s post is dissimilar enough from yours to not be a parody.

4

As someone who spends much of his working day looking through a microscope at stuff, I’d say you’re both overrating the potential for a good time.

5

I think it’s the mentioning of sperm cells that gave Agent Towers’ post that extra oomph.

6

I think we need to examine both threads more closely.

7

Perhaps your $100 price point is too low to get the attention of the serious Doper microscopers. Argent Towers was willing to lay out some serious scratch.

8

Thank you. :o

9

Sorry, he bumped his thread before you did yours. You both posted during working hours, when microscope-using people were using their scopes. :wink: I caught the thread after it was bumped later that day. Sorry, I didn’t see yours first.

Same things applies, no?

In summary:

The Excalibur of microscopes costs way more than $100, and microscopes in that price range are not the ones that microscope-using scientists use frequently.

Binocular is better that monocular, sorry. Especially binoculars that let you adjust eyepiece distance and have fine focus on their pieces.

Y’all have me dumbfounded about why you would want to get microscopes as a hobby. To each their own…

10

Now your thread is locked.

11

It’s perfectly normal for you to feel this way. When someone else takes credit for your idea, it’s completely valid for you to feel a little bit threatened and resentful. Just remember that it doesn’t in any way reflect on you. And see if you can channel those feelings into making some positive changes for the future.

And now, I’d like to speak to Argent Towers. Can you do that for me, Agent, can you let me speak to Argent, now?

12

I’ll start a thread to ask what is the best equipment we can use for that job.

13

Any pit thread that has a title with the words “a moment please”, is going to suck. This is now a fact.

14

I think we need to examine this issue deeper. To use a euphemism, as if “under a microscope”.

15

Or, you could say, we need to “examine both threads more closely.” :stuck_out_tongue:

16

Guilty as charged. I had a choice between closing the second thread opened, or closing the one with (almost) no responses.

17

FYI your link to the still open thread is vroken.

18

Vranks. Fixed it.

19

Czarcasm likes Argent Towers better. Sorry.

20

I always get you two A.T.-initialled guys confused anyway.