Arturo's open letter to Lynn, et al

rsa, I can’t speak for Lynn, but I assumed she meant as an example of what NOT to post in ATMB.

And then there’s the fact that the whole subject had already been beaten to death over the course of several days in 3 or 4 different threads, and at the time there was a perfectly good, very civil Pit thread devoted to it sitting right here on the front page of this forum. Starting another thread about it, and in the wrong forum, was likely just a tad annoying and could possibly be seen as troll-like behavior.

Again, I can’t speak for Lynn for the other Admins/Mods, but I think Arturo got off lightly because he is a newbie - if it had been one of the regs he/she most likely would have been yelled at both publicly and privately because they definitely should know better.

I’ve been around here a long time, although I don’t usually post much. I remember when the decision was made to put all complaints about the board in the Pit, because no matter how nicely the OP was put the thread usually devolved into a pissing match and was moved to the Pit anyway. It cleared up ATMB for other just-as-important questions and made less work for the mods.

If I’m wrong I’m sure Lynn or one of the other mods will be along to correct me - and I won’t even bitch and whine about it.

I think
Lib has this vision of the SDMB as the Springfield Council of Alphas. I, for, one, don’t want to mate only every seven years. (although I do like the idea of serving jury duty at the Municipal Fortress of Vengeance).

I have no idea what he means by “our greatness” and other balderdash, but he really needs to crack open a beer and watch some tube. He’d feel a lot better.

coosa, thanks. I suspect that you’re right. Usually when I think a mod is going overboard, there turns out to be a lot of history with which I’m not familiar.

Lib, the problem is, Arturo didn’t give examples of how we’re not fighting ignorance, how we’re too P.C., etc. What he said came off as (whether it was his intention or not), “Things were so much better in the old days, and they’re bad now.” If you’re going to say something like that, and if you want people, or the board to change, you’re going to have to lay out how you’d like it to change. Then people can read your points, and either say, “Oh yeah, I’ll try to do better.”, or “No, it’s better the way it is.” It’s not that those things above don’t matter, it’s that the best way to fix it isn’t to compose a jeremiad.

I admit, I don’t like everything about this message board. I’m not a fan of flirting threads, and there are a lot of those, and sometimes it does seem like posters’ reactions to messages depend more on who’s posting the message than the contents of the message. I know that the thread I start isn’t going to get read and commented on as quickly as one Fenris or you, or Scylla or even Wildest Bill starts, because I’m not as interesting a poster. (Whether this is good or bad is debatable) I’m ok with that, though, because that’s not a trait of this message board, so much as it is a reality in life. I’m just glad to be exposed to so much knowledge.

I hope this message doesn’t sound too critical of you, because that’s not my intention. While I don’t usually agree with your opinions, I’ve always respected the purity of your beliefs, the passion that you bring to your posts, and the politeness with which you treat others.

As an extremely new guy I hesitate to post on such a contentious topic, but…

I find it really hard to stomach the attitude being popularly expressed, summed up as “if you don’t like it, leave.” This makes no sense to me. Sure, from the perspective of the person making the criticism, if conditions become unbearable (to them) than yes, they should leave. But aren’t we losing a lot of valuable voices in that way?

I’m part of the board of a theatre company. From time to time we get new members. These new members, sometimes, have opinions about the way we run things, ideas on how we can improve our shows and our overall efficiency. It would be very easy to stifle any criticism, to say, “if you don’t like it, leave.” But we would have missed out on a ton of opportunities to improve the group. And in most cases, the people offering the ideas didn’t WANT to leave; they wanted to take something that’s basically good and make it even better.

Is everyone SO certain that there is no room for improvement in this particular community that they are willing to simply paint every criticism with the same, “fine, then leave,” brush? If someone has a more effective way to build a sand castle, I don’t really see the benefit on any side from spitefully forcing him or her out of the sandbox instead of listening.

  • Frank

I think you might feel a little differently, STORY, if lots of your members, new and old, offered criticism that was not constructive – that was, in effect, just so much whining. And I think you’d feel differently if you were hearing the same thing over and over and over again: “Ah, how much better it was here before.” “The mods suck!” “My thread shouldn’t have been closed, even though I called someone a goat felcher and it was in MPSIMS.” Blah blah blah blah blah.

For every thread offering criticism of the Board that might be considered constructive, there are probably ten non-constructive ones bitching about how it is run. For every thread commending the mods and admins on how they do their jobs – for free – there are probably a fifty complaining about or second-guessing their decisions.

I can appreciate the call for constructive dialogue. I have nothing against newbies at all, but stick around a while and gauge for yourself how “constructive” most of this nonsense is. You’ll find that most of it ain’t – and to those who gratuitiously complain – without making constructive suggestions, without noting how well things are actually done most of the time, without checking to see if their complaint has been addressed before – yeah, to them I say, “If you don’t like it, then leave.”

storyteller, there is plenty of room for discussion here. I wish I had a nickel for every post in ATMB asking about a policy or suggesting a new forum, or asking for new smilies, or what have you.

But you put it very well – “if conditions become unbearable (to them) than yes, they should leave.”

But dig this …
If someone on your theater board – or better yet, a member of the audience at one of your plays – stood up and said, “I’ve decided that our theater now sucks. It should be redesigned as a theater in the round. And if you dimwits can’t see that then you’re not worth my time,” – do you really think everybody else would, or should follow his edict for the sake of appeasment. I say no.

And besides all that. This isn’t a theater. This is FREE message board. I would venture to say that if something here is upsetting someone so much that it physically or emotionally disturbs them, they need to reassess their own priorities and not set forth on a crusade to change 18,000 virtual strangers’ minds.

disclaimer: I don’t spend much time in GD, so some of these posters and their styles are a bit new to me.

Arturo asked us to turn a mirror on ourselves. We seem to refuse to do so. He said to us, “This is how you look to me, right or wrong. Please look at yourselves.” We refuse to look. We are even vehemently fighting the suggestion that we look.

Yet, we are quick to turn that mirror to others to cry “foul” (This mod closed my thread but this one is still open) or to complain (So-and-so is an idiot). When asked to look in the mirror ourselves, we decry the request.

In this thread, that Arturo started, we are having a civil (mostly :wink: ) discussion about the OP. In a similar thread, opened by a different poster, the same topic is met with negative, tiresome comments. Yes, each poster has history behind them, but it’s obvious that each post is not measured anew.

Arturo told us that when he looks at us he doesn’t like what he sees. Yes, that is his opinion and he is entitled to it. Consider that his opionion, though possibly only his, is based on something real - if only to him. To “fight ignorance”, as we are quick to toss around, we should try to determine if his observations have merit. We should, to be true to fighting ignorance, look into that mirror. We should also look honestly into that mirror.

Instead of doing this, we respond with, “He didn’t tell us exactly what he didn’t like” or “He didn’t make any suggestions about how to improve.” Why is it his responsibility? Where do we get the notion that, since he brought it up, it’s up to him to evince change?

The only “advice” he offered was for us to please look at ourselves and how we behave. Advice is like castor oil - easy enough to give but dreadfully awful to take. Maybe we should take his advice and look in the mirror.

[sub]I took the castor quote from somebody famous, whose name escapes me.

Each time I typed “mirror” I actually typed “mirrir”. I hope I caught all of these before submitting.

Libertarian I’ve never read your stuff before, but I really respect your style and ability to get points across well. Maybe I’ll hang out in GD a bit more.[/sub]

I’ve been around for a while and I’ve lurked for a while before that. And I never post to these sorts of things, but I have a few comments…

As I write this there are 225 members logged in. We do not all speak with one voice. We do not all share opinions (obviously). We don’t all need to look at how self absorbed or rightous we are (although it is a valid critisism of some). Some posters are very visible, others are not so visible. And visiblity depends on where you hang. I’d never noticed Sultan before, cause I don’t hang where he does (hell, I only recently discovered jarbabyj is into kink, am I the only one? And there are flirting threads over in MSPIMS!). There are great posters who have little visability (jharding with 103 total posts is one of my favorites) - and a few pain in the butts whose visibilty is huge.

If anyone wants to stay and make this place a better place with your voice - by all means do so, I think this place is pretty welcoming of most voices (don’t be a jerk, and don’t be ignorant are probably the only exceptions). Granted, some opinions are going to get your grief (never open a pro-gun control thread over in GD, it isn’t worth it). But probably most of us think its a pretty OK place the way it is. And if it isn’t worth the effort to make this little corner a better place in your eyes - no one is under any obligation to stay.

I agree.
If New Guy #1 wants to whine-- well, he will. If Old Guy #1 wants to complain about NG#1 whining-- he will. If Old Guy #2 chimes in and calls NG#1 a whiner-- he will. If New Guy #2 starts complaining that the 2 Old Guys are a clique out to get the New Guys-- he will.
So, are the old guys supposed to let the new guys carp and whine without saying anything? Are the new guys supposed to keep quiet about feeling left out until they have over 1000 posts?

Everyone’s entitled to their own opinion. [sub]Of course, they’re only right if their opinion is the same as mine. But that’s a different discussion.

Gosh, people posted while I was composing.

Jodi posted:

Then Jack Batty posted:

These points are made and are valid. Hearing whining ad infinitum does “desensitize” one to true concerns. And yes, we here have seen many, many such threads. Similarly, the “outsider” who pipes up with venom and anger will not be heard or respected. However, this is not what happened here. Therefore, it is unfair (though incredibly easy) to view this OP through that lens. Nowhere did Arturo post with anger or malice. Nor was he particularly whining. Certainly he had concerns that others have whined about and even yelled about, but he shouldn’t be judged with the burdens of what others have done.

Certainly we can pick apart the OP for specific words or phrases that were driven by strong emotion, but that is more indicative of his passion than his “trying to change us.” It would be unfair to judge his intent as worthless because of minor phraseology. Would we hold a more popular opinion to the same scrutiny and judgment? I doubt it.

But let’s augment your analogy a little bit. Suppose you got, say, fifty new members a day. All of them had different ideas about how your company should be run. How do you appease fifty new, conflicting ideas? You don’t. You can’t. You figure out a base set of rules, regulations, and customs that allows maximum flexibility while still maintaining order. With that setup, most people are happy… but even so, you get the occasional “black sheep” who just doesn’t fit in no matter what you do.

What is to be done in that situation? In my own theatre group, we’ve had people with new ideas and new mannerisms. Some of them have been extremely skilled, brilliant, and intelligent. Unfortunately, every now and then we get a person who just doesn’t mesh well with others. For example, one of our greatest techies, Ty, kept having issues with our director. Nevermind that Ty was brilliant, and one of the best people at what he did… eventually, the director just stopped asking him to do tech work, just because there was a problem between them personality-wise.

SPRITLE –

Aw, bullshit. If I am going to reexamine myself, you’d better give me a reason to first. And I mean a reason other than “We used to be such good friends. Now you suck, and that makes me sad.” Why on earth should we take his sanctimonious whining to be anything other than exactly what it appears to be? This goes double for newbies, who – while of course having every right to post their opinion – cannot be surprised to find their criticism met with “Why don’t you settle in before you start throwing rocks, sunshine?”

Again – bullshit. I am perfectly willing to judge him on what he himself posted. He said:

I mean, really. This guy’s an asshole. Why would anyone around here feel they need to reexamine anything based upon the opinion of some unknown asshole.

I have not “picked apart” his OP, I have merely pulled out the highlights, which are totally in keeping with the tone of the posts in their entirety, which is that we suck and he’s sad about it. How the TV show disappointed him! How the Staff Reports disappointed him! How Cecil Himself has gone downhill and disappointed him! How the Message Board has disappointed him! Well, fuck off, is what I say, and I say it without a twinge of worry that something done wrong around here might actually justify such self-important drivel. Legitimate concerns can be brought to anyone’s attention without being insulting, patronizing, or offensive.

I absolutely would hold another poster to the same standard. And I do find his intent to be worthless. As DOUG said, not here but in the closed thread: Apparently, this isn’t for him. Fine. Buh-bye.

There’s another message board where I’m pretty well known (or was). Have posted maybe half a dozen times in the past 9 months now. I still keep in touch with certain folks from there, have never felt a dire need to post a dramatic ‘THIS is why I’m leaving’ - and I was pretty heavily invested there, had been a regular poster for over a year. So I guess you can imagine my level of interest when some one comes around dangles their baby toe around and about, and decides, for whatever reason it’s not for them, but stops to give the big dramiticly flourishing exit speech.

We get about a dozen or so new members EVERY DAY. More if we’ve been featured somewhere. Granted, about half of them won’t bother to ever make a post, and three or four of the the remaining six will never reach a double digit post count, but that still leaves us with gaining two or three new “regular” posters a day. We can’t drastically change our customs for each new poster.

We also have a LOT of low post count people who seem to be only interested in telling us how we can improve our board, or complaining about the message board. Tracing IPs, these complaints and suggestions seem to come from only a few locations. So my FIRST reaction upon seeing yet another complaint or “suggestion” is to think that it’s yet another sock. Maybe I’m missing some good suggestions. But I’ve seen this situation played out so very many times before. Some people ONLY want to bitch about the way we do things.

Waaaay back on AOL, when I first became a Straight Dope Moderator, I learned that no matter WHAT I do, I won’t please everyone. In fact, I learned that when I was a cashier at various jobs. I am likely to pay quite a lot of attention to what my boss wants, and lots and lots of attention to what a repeat customer wants. I’m not likely to really get upset if someone new pokes his/her head in the door and announces that this place (whether it’s a message board or a retail store) has problems. In my personal life, if a stranger comes up to me and tells me that I really shouldn’t wear black, it doesn’t suit me, then I’ll shrug it off. If my best friend says the same thing, I’m likely to take a good hard look at myself to see whether it really DOESN’T suit me. Same thing applies in this situation.

Lynn
Both as poster and administrator

Jodi and coosa, thanks, too. You’ve explained a good deal of my reasoning.

I don’t think that this message board (I’m talking about the hardware, software, AND wetware) as a whole is perfect. No collection of human artifacts and human beings is gonna be perfect. I do think that this message board is a vibrant place, very interesting, fun, and worth spending my time on. I certainly wouldn’t volunteer my time on something that I felt was fatally flawed.

The SDMB is not for everyone. But enough people find enough value in it for it to continue, in my opinion.

Lynn

Yes, I know: “If you don’t like the SDMB, then why are you posting YET AGAIN, you [insert: “asshole,” “newbie,” “cantankerous lout,” &c.]?”
I have read through this thread and have been at times impressed, amazed, disappointed, and intrigued. I found the extent and number of responses very interesting. Currently, I feel that some sort of response on my part is necessary.
First, let me say that anyone who had read any of my 20-odd posts would know that I am not what you consider a “troll.” For the most part, I have offered advice and experience in the GQ and CS when I felt that it was mine to offer, whether it was regarding astro’s daughter’s desire to be a DJ, a question about automobiles, or a query into the performers of the song “If You See Kay.” Perhaps a few posts were frivolous as well. The rest of the time I have been reading. I think you consider such activity to be “lurking,” and perhaps you frown upon it. I think conversations are for listening as much as for participating, and I don’t like to open my yap unless it’s called for.
I had read through the SDMB quite a bit before I became a member. I know some of you think that what you write is of such a profound nature that it would be difficult to comprehend it swiftly. On the contrary, I read through a number of threads during my first visit. Even more my second, third, etc, etc. I do feel that I have gained insight into what occurs on this board. I will definitely admit that there are a number of intelligent and eloquent members here, but quite a few of the reactions to my post – many by those who seem to be “popular” members, such as Fenris – only seemed to prove my arguments of an insular, self-involved community (or at least members thereof).
Fenris, congratulations. You have come close to being the first person to nearly offend me on this board. The SDMB is nowhere near on par with a Jewish community center, and my actions were not akin to making derisive comments towards a culture which has existed for over thousands of years. Perhaps you regret the analogy, but if that comparison isn’t a prime example of self-importance, then I’m wasting my money paying off these college loans – I certainly didn’t learn anything there. Your argument goes hand in hand with the tired, “You’re a newbie who posted 20 times. Shut up.”
Am I a new member to the SDMB? Of course. But I am not at all new to the Straight Dope or to the quest for knowledge. I am not new to intellectual debates. I am not new to excited, yet mundane, conversations about “Mr. Show” or such. I am not new to the world or to the many cultures therein. When I say that I do not care about your etiquette or jargon, my point is that the “culture” of internet conversations has created it’s own insular conventions that, if not abided by, result in lashings by some. It is not as if I entered a Star Wars appreciation board and said, “I don’t like sci-fi and fantasy and I’ve never seen Star Wars, but you guys are a bunch of geeks and you need to go play some football and listen to Foghat.” This is the STRAIGHT DOPE message board, so forgive me if I hold it to my standards of what the Straight Dope is – which, I have said ad nauseam, is based on what I feel is extensive study of the Straight Dope oeuvre.
Personally, I have not been attacked – previously – on this board, and I did not feel that anyone had hurt my feelings by not responding to a thread I started or such. I was not thrashing out because of a personal attack upon me. I was commenting on what I saw happening among people who are supposed to be better than all this.
If I had studied ancient Greek civilization for 15+ years and stumbled upon “Gary’s Goin’ Greek Fantasyland” and found it sub par to everything I has learned, I would – IMHO – have the authority to say, “I think what some of you are doing is wrong and out of touch with what I have learned about Greek civilization throughout my years.” Along the same lines, I must address the concept of “If you don’t like it leave” or “If you made fun of my party, you’d be RUDE RUDE RUDE!” I am the type of person who does make a point of expressing discontent before I leave. It is the only way anyone will ever know why you left, get it? If you leave quietly, then you allow that establishment to continue believing that all is well in their domain. If I receive poor service from a company, I tell the manager/supervisor/owner. It’s not my duty to tell him/her how to fix it, but they need to be aware that someone has left dissatisfied. I think anyone who doesn’t let such thoughts known is doing an inconvenience to the rest of us. “Don’t let the door hit ya on the ass” is just a protective way of saying, “Hey, c’mon, we’re good enough, we’re smart enough. And doggone it, people like us.” Check out the thread on poor Sprint service to see how your members feel when they get a lackluster response from a company which obviously feels that “Hey, we’ve got enough customers that don’t waste our time by bitching, so hey, don’t let the door hit ya on the ass.”
And yes, if I went to a party and there were eight different rooms with people engaged in a variety of conversations which were held in a manner such as some of these threads are, I would definitely voice my concern before I left. And you should do so to. You can be calm and intelligent and say, “I am leaving because I don’t like the manner in which your friends talk to each other and especially how they treat the new people.” Jodi, you can’t just vote with your feet, otherwise people will just think you left because your tummy hurt.
I appreciate Libertarian’s standing up for me. I probably wouldn’t have posted a whole new thread if I had known of his. Of course, I am not so self-involved as to believe that anyone would have started a thread in defense of my little self. As for Lynn, my problem is that in my original thread, she offered to move it to the Pit. That would have been fine by me. Suddenly, she decided to close it, as an “example.” Impaling the heads of the conquered and placing them around the castle, eh? Many mods seem to simply say, “Feel free to start this discussion again in [GD, CS, Pit, &c.].” Lynn made, in my opinion, an extreme statement, one that seemed to augment my concerns.
Am I occasionally an impulsive person? Sure. I saw what some members and mods were doing (Uncle Beer needs to seriously think before he writes, from the few angry, vulgar posts I’ve seen so far) and leveled blame across the whole board. I consider myself computer savvy – like people 1/3 my age, I have established a few web sites of my own, performed research, corresponded with others, etc etc. But the insular conventions of some netizens astounds me, and I cannot imagine these people attempting to abide by these rules in real world interactions.
That said, perhaps I will accept the invitations offered to me by some of you. Perhaps I will stop by occasionally, do what I was doing – post when necessary, try to be intelligent and eloquent – and ignore all of the rest. To be sure, I didn’t come here to make friends or join a “community” per se – no offense, but I have friends outside of the computer. I just want to learn more, and even in my years to date, I cannot say I know everything. I came here to extract knowledge, to build upon what I believe is an already pretty damn good foundation of a human being. Perhaps I was just disappointed that not everyone here seemed to want that. Forgive me if I don’t tell you outright how funny your joke was or how cool your most recent post is. A lot of writers don’t get that kind of benefit anyway. I’m sure if I decide to continue posting, I’ll be stuck with the stigma of this thread. I’ve seen how some of you belittle the ones who annoy you (and no cites, you all know who you are and who gets attacked). That’s okay. Maybe I’ll pretend this is “Gary’s Goin’ Genius Message Board” and not at all affiliated with the Straight Dope. I still stand behind all that I said, but dammit, I want to fight ignorance too.

The <enter> key is your friend, Art.

Now, minty, here is a good example of what I’ve been discussing.

I tried to clarify a few aspects of my opinion and respond to some previous posts. Part of my argument is that some people are too tied to the conventions of presentation than to the merit of the idea.

I think I did a fairly intelligent job of it.

Your response?

To make fun of how I visually presented my response.

Thanks for welcoming me back into the fold.

ARTURO –

Actually, if you want a prime example of self-importance, I suggest you re-read your own posts. Your pomposity and condescension are really quite striking. You, sir, are an egotistical windbag, so perhaps a pot such as yourself should not call a kettle like FENRIS self-important.

But you are, as you admit, new to the SDMB. Therefore, it woudl behoove you not to begin your tenure here by critiquing the hosts or the other guests. Why would you imagine that those of us who do not know you, but who do know (and like) the people you are criticizing, would give your opinion any credence whatsoever – would view it as anything more than what it is, which is so much whining?

And who died and made you Judge of the Straight Dope oeuvre? Do you imagine you are the only one who has read the books and the columns? Do you imagine you are the only one who has a long history of reading and appreciating the works of Cecil Adams? Yes, even going back dozens of years? Do you imagine that anyone cares that this is all ever so disappointing to you? Did anyone ask?

This is of course approriate when you have paid for services, such as at a restuarant or shop. It is entirely inappropriate when you are invited, or invite youself, to a gathering held by someone else for entertainment purposes. If you truly express your discontent to the host before you leave a party, then you are every bit the boor you appear to be.

Follow me closely here: No one here cares why you leave. Really. We have lots and lots of members who like it here, and more join every day. If it’s not your cup of tea, fine. Bon voyage as you search for greener pastures. But do not let your breathtaking self-importance delude you into imagining that anyone gives a shit why you leave – especially since you are not an established poster and have thus far given us no reason to give your opinion any credit whatsoever. And we continue to believe that all is well in the domain because all is. We like it here, just as it is. If you don’t, then hit the bricks. But don’t imagine for a second that you are the arbiter of whether an existing, vibrant community is or is not “okay.” If it isn’t “okay” enough for you, then get the fuck out.

Then you really are a boor. It’s not your party. You were not specifically invited. You just wandered in. And you are so self-importannt that you imagine that the rest of the party-goers – who neither know you nor have any reason to respect your opinion – give a shit why you leave. They don’t. If they are enjoying the party as it is, your critique of it will naturally be met with suspicion and criticism. Even if you felt obliged to voice your judgment on your way out the door – and were deluded enough to think anyone appreciated it – you certainly have done so. So feel free to toddle off. How can we miss you if you don’t go away?

Ah, so we won’t lose you after all? What a relief. :rolleyes: Make no mistake, though: It is never necessary to post. Your intelligence and eloquence will not be missed – no one’s ever is, no matter how great. But if you choose to stay, kindly stop pointing out how intelligent and eloquent you are; it’s tiresome and distasteful. Your posts should speak for themselves, without the clap-trap of “I’ve read the columns for years; I’m designed websites; I love me, I think I’m grand, when I’m with me, I hold my hand.”

So do all the rest of us. We didn’t come here to join a community or make friends, either; that’s just something that happens if you hang around the asylum long long enough. Or, rather, it happens for those who want it to, and who don’t feel obliged to put off people with their unsolicited criticism and distasteful self-perceived superiority.

:slight_smile: Well, at least I got a laugh out of this. How it must hurt you to have to admit you don’t know everything, despite your “years to date!” But at least you can comfort yourself with your obvious belief that you know almost everything.