Welcome to the boards, Sweetuth and tlw. tlw, thank you for echoing my concern that vivian be seen as only speaking for herself and no one else.
Jodi said:
"Um, no. Racism is the belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability – including such patently ridiculous statements such as “white people smell like raw meat,” which become neither less ridiculous nor less racist when recast as “I only said that white people smell like raw meat to me.”
Well, I define a belief in X thing as PREJUDICE. Taking the step of acting on said belief to hold someone else back socially, politically, or economically is RACISM. But you may define racism however you want to. In this thread, I find vivian’s statements to be ignorant and, as has been demonstrated by the responses of folks in this thread, offensive. While I am offended by vivian’s ignorance, I hesitate to call her a racist because she hasn’t acted on these beliefs. She didn’t of her own volition go up to a Doper and offend them, she’s responding to questions–some of which are arguably designed to elicit controversial responses–that Dopers have asked her. If she wants to call herself a racist, fine. I won’t argue with her assessment, but from where I’m sitting, racism is a little more complex. YMMV
Jodi said:
"And I do wonder, idly, if a white racist posting generalities about blacks and how they smell and how they dress and how sexually easy they are, would be met with such tolerance. Somehow I doubt it.
Ignorant generalizations based on race are definitionally racism. Racism is wrong. It doesn’t become less wrong just because it’s a black person spouting it."
No, neither a racist nor an ignorant person, white or otherwise, would be met with tolerance if they posted offensive generalizations about any cultural group on this board. vivian is posting some ignorant generalizations, and folks are questioning her about them.
IMHO “ignorant generalizations based on race” are PREJUDICE. ACTING on those “ignorant generalizations” to hinder someone from getting a job, voting, or mixing socially with other groups is RACISM.
Jodi said:
"It is not naivete to assume that such threads are started to shed some general knowledge – not merely personal knowledge. . . It is not ridiculous to reject them as a spokesperson for much of the class, however – that’s the whole point of such threads. I do reject VIVIAN as such a spokesperson, for reasons already given. "
I’m glad you don’t see vivian as a “spokesperson” for black people. What I take issue with in this thread and others like it is the fact that anyone would see ONE individual as “a spokesperson for much of the class.” The only thing folks should take away from these “Ask the ____” threads is that they have talked with and learned of one person’s perspective on the topic of X. That is unless the person provides some cites to other texts or provides some reference to a historical event/person you can research. vivian represents herself, and that is it.
quote:
I’ve said this before, and I’ll say it again. Blackness is not monolithic; it is as rich and varied in nuances of experience as there are people who call themselves black. . . .
Blah, blah, blah. I have said nothing even addressing any of this, let alone something you could take issue with.
Well, wait a minute now. You just said that you look at the people who start these “Ask the ____” threads as “a spokesperson for much of the class.” I’m starting to get confused, but okay. Whatever. Whether or not you addressed my concerns about folks seeing vivian as the “spokesperson” for any class of black people, the fact remains that folks are posting questions to vivian in the hopes that she can provide insight into black culture. That indicates that they probably do not know many black folks IRL and/or are ignorant of black culture and history. What I take issue with–and I think rightly so–is folks tendency to take as a given the word of ONE black person as the “spokesperson” for the majority if not all of the group. It has been MY experience as a black person to see this phenomena occur again and again. I see it in folks asking questions about who is the best black leader? Who speaks for black people? What I take issue with is the fact that non-black folks think that black folks CAN’T SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES AS INDIVIDUALS. No one speaks for ME, but ME. Does that make sense to you? Do you see why I’ve raised the concerns that I have in this thread?
Look, Jodi, I’m not looking to attack you. I too can respect the fact that vivian is making an effort to communicate with non-black folks, and even though I don’t agree with a lot of what she’s saying, I will defend her right to voice her opinion, but I’m going to voice my opinion too. You can believe what you want to. You can define racism however you want to, just as I will define racism and prejudice as I see fit, but don’t you dare dismiss some very real concerns that I’ve raised in this thread about the dynamics of who is speaking for whom because even if you’ve come to the conclusion that vivian is not a “spokesperson” for black folks or black culture, I can well imagine there are plenty of folks who’ve posted or not posted to this thread who may be tempted to see her otherwise.