Am I a butterfly?
In other words your butt ugly and trying to cover it up with your large vocabulary?
Ya ain’t fooling me mate!
Ah, please excuse my forgetfullness. I also meant to ask, How do deities address thee?
He wrote me a poem!
(a most kingly present).
I might dare to have hopes
If I weren’t but a peasant.*
*Demographically speaking, is it more likely that a commercial insurer will be called upon to pay double indemnity on the life of a noble or a peasant? How would your answer change if the policy were reinsured by an off-shore captive owned by a group of insureds?
Humble Servant are you trying to torture me with these insurance questions?
Gaah.
pan
Thoughts of such matters cause us to rent our robe in twain.
Eunice Howell, of course.
It has caused us to experience strange and anomalous contractions of our risorius muscles.
It is difficult to discern whether any given lepidoptera is a butterfly or a moth. We therefore decree that it be a scopula limboundata.
It says glossology; we say glottology.
Deities address us familiarly as their Jurisdictor Regnant.
Our reign is insured
by God from above.
We need no insurance
aside from His love.
one night as I dined with the King,
He did a most curious thing,
he sat on his stool,
and took out his tool,
and asked “If I play, will you sing?”
Hmmm… That’s a bit long. I’m going to call thee J.R. for short. Does thou mind?
There once was a peasant who ate
from our majesty’s glorious plate.
It reached for our fly
and was poked in the eye.
An incredibly odd twist of fate!
We do indeed. We would advise it, however, that the proper grammar is “dost thou mind”.
::sniff::
I think I’ve received more personal validation from this thread than in all other threads since the Interregnum**combined.
“God will provide?”
This King’s not barmy.
Relies on God,
But keeps his army.
*Let’s say the spouse of a US national captured and tortured by the Taliban makes a claim for loss of consortium under a general business interruption policy. How would you word the letter denying coverage? How would your answer change if the US national was a CIA agent and the torture claim was made pursuant to a workers’ compensation policy?
**Using the word in the non-royal sense, of course.
Would Great Britain or France have the greater claim that in map view, the chunnel might be mistaken for one’s poop chute?
France has no legitimate claims of any kind. Does that answer its question?
Yep. 
Your humble Cousin It.