anyone but me nodice that askeptic seems to very commonly post absolutely harsh bitter nonsense rabidly attacking people at random that only (s)/he actually seems bothered by?
Yes, but you forgot to curse.
He gets riled up a little easily and says some really dumb things, but he means well.
Yeah I noticed this too. I was wondering why this guy suddenly seemed to be all over the boards, then I saw this:
Now I see. It’s because he’s suddenly all over the boards.
Just as a totally unrelated thought that was not at all prompted by this thread here, I was wondering if the new pay-to-post system would cut down on spectacular flameouts.
May increase them, what with only having 30 days to get it all out there.
Link to some insanity please???
Cite? Cite?
Provide it or fade into that dark night, hon.
guest accounts can’t search.
Just to help owlofcreamcheese out, I saw this thread by askeptic earlier today. I’m not sure if he’s really pitworthy yet, just that maybe he needs to think a little longer before posting.
Aw, leave 'em alone! He’s just trying to make up for three or four years absence!
(Accidentaly posted in the rabid rabbi thread)
Stuff like this…
…just isn’t posted by newbies. Whoever this guy is, he hit the ground running when he started up, familiar with everyone and everything. He called me Lib in his very first post to me, and seemed familiar with me in a spooky way that I wouldn’t expect from someone here less than a month. I reported three such incidences. I’m not saying anything in particular; maybe he lurked for like four years or something. There was a hand-stabber here at one time who was so ascerbic that even the board’s hard atheists disowned him, and I can’t remember his name. Although Askeptic sounds a lot like him, it is metaphysically possible that it is just a confluence of coincidences.
[QUOTE=LibertarianThere was a hand-stabber here at one time who was so ascerbic that even the board’s hard atheists disowned him, and I can’t remember his name.[/QUOTE]
Hand-stabber? Sounds good but means…what?
A particularly vicious and evangelistic atheist. Think Madalyn Murray O’Hare.
Thank you I couldn’t find a reference anywhere. It’s a nice turn of phrase.
Yes, it is one Lib is quite proud of. Here is one for his type: Loon.
Next to Leander, you are my favorite ankle-nipper. I am delighted that you are never able to resist alerting me that you are there.
Oh, I am just nipping then? Guess I will try to bite harder.
What, no modal logic proof to show that I don’t exist?
:rolleyes:
So, in other words, if you can’t get a reaction, you’ll do/say something more outrageous to get a reaction?
Uh-huh.
Nah, I don’t have to say anything outrageous at all, I only need speak the truth. Lib IS a loon of the first degree. He has “proof” god exists, has thwarted modern atomic theory by “proving” atoms do not exist. How could I possibly say anything more outrageous than this- he proves himself a loon.
Libertarian is a cancer of ignorance. He is highly intelligent and uses every chance he can to be as dishonest as possible in “proving” things of dubious soundness. We try to fight ignorance here, not promote intellectual masterbation and dishonesty in trying to bully others and prove to others that he has a brain. (read: trying to prove he is so much better than everybody else)
Unfortunately you cannot fight cancer with kindness. Too many people on this message board support this stain upon the message board. I rate him with the same crackpotness as His4ever, leroy, and every other wierdo and loony person that has come this way. He is merely more intelligent, but a loon all the same.
Truely if Lib were so intelligent he would have contributed to the acedemic world, I mean if he has proof atoms don’t exist, perhaps he should be published in a peer reviewed journal or something? Yet all he does is sit on this message board masturbating and spewing his loony semen all over the 'lesser foes."
You should be ashamed in defending him. Or do you regularly defend Ignorance?
**
As much of a loon as someone, say, following him around from thread to thread, hijacking each thread to feed that person’s own weird psychosis?
**
But, see, he wasn’t actually doing any of that stuff here. If you see him doing stuff like that, by all means, feel free to jump him if the spirit so moves you. Th’ thing of it is though, I’ve seen Lib post tons of stuff besides the philosophical stuff that causes you emotional trauma. Posts about game shows, posts about books, posts about just silly/fun shit. You? I’ve only seen you stalk him (and I’m willing to grant that you may, in fact, have a posting history that I’ve missed that doesn’t involve you stalking Lib. But I haven’t seen it). And stalking is much more annoying than any alleged “ignorance”.
**
Y’know, Lib and I have had some pretty strong arguments/disagreements over politics and other topics–and yet he’s remained civil, even when I disagree with him. You? The above makes you sound not just like a stalker, but a scary psycho stalker.
**
But again, he wasn’t doing this alleged “crackpotness” stuff here. The only person who brought up this “crackpotness” is you.
**
And, I assume you have published stuff in peer-reviewed journals? No? Ahd yet, here you are on a message board “masturbating and spewing your” stalker-esque semen all over". :rolleyes: Lord save me from little people with big inferiority complexes.
**
:rolleyes:
No, Senator McCarthy, I’ve not now, nor have I ever defended ignorance. I do get annoyed by stalkers hijacking threads while gleefully admitting to trolling to get reactions though.
Fenris