Atheist's family claims he was Christian at his funeral. Should they be called on it?

Today’s story is about Amber Grey, who spent much of her twenties saying yes to drugs. To support her habit, she whored, lied, cheated, and stole. There’s not a member of her family she didn’t exploit at one point or another, and eventually they all wrote her off–all of them, that is, except for her twin brother, Mitch. When Amber hit rock bottom, Mitch was the one who picked her up. He got her into detox, took her in afterwards, and provided tender and tough love as needed. Clean for five years now, Amber credits Mitch for saving her life.

A week ago, Mitch was badly injured in an accident and died within hours. Flying his body from New York (where they both lived), to Memphis (where they grew up) for burial, Amber was sure her family would be hostile; to her surprise, they welcomed her warmly. Mitch had been in regular correspondence with them and had told them how she had changed, and, happily, they believed him. Agreeing that she should give the eulogy, her mother in particular encouraged her to stay in Tennessee as long she needed if she needed support to stay clean.

Amber & Mitch are the youngest children of a brood of six, the rest of whom are members of a Pentecostal church pastored by their father; Mitch’s funeral is being held there. The program for the funeral (which their church calls a homecoming celebration) misleadingly implies that Mitch was a born-again Christian. The obit says he was “saved, sanctified, and filled with the Holy Ghost” at nine–true enough, but leaving out that he was pressured into that by their parents, and that he vocally and explicitly repudiated Christianity to them when he was eighteen. When Amber was getting clean, Mitch cautioned her about Twelve Stepping, opining that reliance on a higher power was just a different sort of dependence; as he lay dying, he rebuffed the hospital chaplain when asked if he wanted to make his peace with God, saying he couldn’t be at war with an imaginary being. When Amber tried to point all this out to her siblings, they cut her off. Their parents, her siblings say, are inconsolable in their grief and need to believe that Mitch is in heaven; they certainly don’t need to be humiliated in front of their congregation. And, anyway, who’s to say that Mitch didn’t see the light at the last minute?

The night before the funeral, trying to write the sort of eulogy her siblings suggest, Amber was so grieved and stressed that she went out to score. Luckily she remembered Mitch’s last words–he made her promise to do whatever it took to stay clean–and so she went to a meeting instead. When she told her story, one of the members encouraged her to write a eulogy Mitch would approve of. So she ended up with two versions. One toes the family line; the other talks about all the reasons Mitch was the best person she ever knew, and that includes his atheism, which informed his ethics, his personality, and his love for her.

Which brings us to the funeral, the first two-thirds of which consisted of gospel songs, professions of faith, and one outright sermon. Every minute of it has pissed her off more than the previous one. The emcee has just announced that Amber is the next person to speak. She has both eulogies at hand. Which should she deliver?

She should deliver the honest one. Not for Mitch, but for herself. She might never forgive herself if she gives the dishonest eulogy.

Hopefully, this eulogy emphasizes how this ethical-atheist Mitch, and his unconditional love, saved her from drugs.

The one that would have honored Mitch, and allowed her to stay true to both her and her brother.

I was dying and I decided that even though I’d never particularly been into, say…Enya before but that now I really, really was into Enya and that in fact, I thought Enya was great and that Enya died for our sins and I wanted an Enya themed funeral with pictures of Enya and lots and lots of mentions of Enya, then I think it would be a bit bloody rich for my sister to ban all mention of Enya from my funeral! Yeah?

Mitch has died. Not much point in staying true to those who do not exist.

What purpose is served by Amber’s lobbing a live grenade at the funeral? Because that is what reading the second eulogy is; she will be pretty much calling her siblings and parents liars, and renewing the estrangement between herself and them, and sharply reducing the odds that they will be available to support her in this stressful time. Is that what Mitch would want?

  1. The parents are liars.
  2. Every time the topic came up about Mitch and his deathbed conversion, she would have to lie again and again and again. Surely Mitch had friends that would not believe that such a deathbed conversion took place, and they would be at the service. Does she lie to them, also?

The things we do after people die are for the benefit of the people who are still alive. Amber’s family doesn’t want to hear her, and she doesn’t want to talk to them. She should walk up to the pulpit, hand the dishonest eulogy to her father, and leave. She should then go to a meeting and delivery the honest eulogy there.

The purpose of providing an example of being true to yourself and being a role model for all the young (or closeted) Mitchs among the guests at the funerals. And also to maintain her own self-respect.

When Janet Jeppson Asimov had breast cancer, ca. 1974, she was asked to write a first-person feature on it. She didn’t want to. Isaac pointed out that she should, and be the first such survivor NOT to claim faith and prayer saved her.

It’s important to stand up and be known as an atheist, without being any bigger jerk than you have to be, but not allow family or social pressure to keep you silent, especially in the face of a contrary claim. She should deliver a moving eulogy that mentions her brother’s lack of religious faith in passing and say nothing else about the topic.

As a non-religious person myself I care very little how my family decides to plant me. They can do what they feel is best. I’ll be beyond caring.

“which informed his ethics, his personality, and his love for her.”

Again putting myself into the equation, you could talk about my ethics, personality and love for those close without ever mentioning religion or lack thereof. There is zero need to stir up shit at a funeral. You don’t have to lie. But you don’t have to mention everything. Just like you don’t have to mention that Mitch shoplifted when he was 14 or that he always hated cousin Judy. It’s a hard enough time for everyone. Just let it go and let the family grieve for one afternoon.

Deliver the honest eulogy. Those who are in need of believing that Mitch was Christian will form their own opinion despite what Amber had to say, so it’s not hurting them. And Amber’s going to find more peace in having been honest. Ultimately, everyone wins.

Can she really afford the help of liars and thieves?

One guy will be dead and doesn’t care. A whole family will be grieving and now also pissed off. And one person will be grieving but maybe also selfishly smug. Yep, everyone wins.

Deliver the atheist eulogy. The Christians abandoned her and she owes them nothing but the truth.

A very poetic twist, however, would be for her to tell the tale of a man who strayed from the rigid teachings of his youth, but nevertheless came to her in her hour of need and saved her and turned her life around through acts of charity of heart, humane and human love and tolerance, and faith in her inner strength to overcome the evils that possessed her. An atheist can be compared to Jesus with no insult. After all, Jesus is not the offensive part of the religion. Grinding an axe with her family in that setting would not honor her brother, nor would it help her to further his work with her. And she could spin him as Christ-like without confirming allegations of him being a Christian. Funerals are to help the survivors cope with a death. If others need to believe brother is right with their god, that’s their business.

Can’t prove that from the OP, which only has Amber talking to her siblings about it. And what the OP describes them doing is leaving stuff out, not explicitly lying.

Where are you getting thieves from? Even if we grant that not mentioning Mitch’s adult atheism is a lie, the only person described as stealing anything in the OP is Amber, who stole from her family while she was still using.

And bear in mind that the stress from this affair has already brought her close to using again. Do you think she’s better off if she pisses off her remaining family so much they they tell her to get bent?

The atheists wrote her off after she stole from all of them. Were they supposed to be infinitely enabling her of addiction?

The honest eulogy, as described in the OP, is one that “Mitch would approve of.” It does not say that Mitch was a raving atheist who felt a need to spout off about his religious views at every opportunity.

I took it to mean she didn’t need to go up there and talk about Mitch’s supposed religious faith where he clearly had none. I think she could deliver a perfectly honest eulogy without the need to discuss religion at all. Hence the family being able to form their own opinion.

Are we supposed to totally disregard her feelings, since she’s the one being pressured into lying, for the sake of people wanting to be spoon-fed a load of crap?

Yep. When it’s Christianity versus atheism, the fact that the former side is lying through it’s teeth and threatening emotional blackmail just doesn’t matter-the latter is “selfishly smug” for trying to tell a truth that she thinks will honor her brother and show his strengths and efforts.
The “deathbed conversion” lie isn’t about honoring their son. It’s about them saving face in their religious community.

The religious beliefs of the audience members should have nothing to do with which eulogy Amber reads. The question here seems to be whether an honest, caring person should have to become dishonest and self serving if everyone else in the room is doing so. Of course not.

Amber has to live with herself after this event. She should read what she thinks would have made Mitch happy but she doesn’t necessarily have to throw mean words in anyone’s face to do that. If the rest of the family so can’t even bare the notion that Mitch might have held some different religious beliefs that they would cause a stink at a funeral then Amber can’t hope to fix this situation. It’s broken, off the rails and she should run away as fast as possible. Just after she finishes the honest eulogy.

I think living with, and having to listen to retellings of, the lie for the rest of her life would be much more stressful then getting the truth out there at the service ant putting the stress where it rightfully belongs.

Funerals are to help the living move on. There is no reason to cause more hurt in the family that is hurting already. And why burn down bridges she may want in the future? Her family had welcomed her warmly.

IMHO, Amber should give the churchy eulogy and remember Mitch how she wants to. Church songs and eulogies aren’t causing Mitch to squirm in his casket. The only person stressing out seems to be Amber.

Maybe the family knew one facet of Mitch and Amber knew another.