I find the most sexually attractive feature of a women, assuming she is pretty and intelligent. large areolae - a couple inches in diameter.
Does any one else have this fixation or attraction
I don’t call it a fetish, because it doesn’t reach the extreme proportions of a fetish.
Is this weird or what?
[quote]
a·re·o·la (-r-l) also ar·e·ole (âr-l).
n., pl. a·re·o·lae (-l) or a·re·o·las also ar·e·oles (-lz).
[ul][li]Biology. A small space or interstice in a tissue or part, such as the area bounded by small veins in a leaf or the wing of an insect.[/li][li]A small, specialized, cushionlike area on a cactus from which hairs, glochids, spines, branches, or flowers may arise.[/li][li]Anatomy. A small ring of color around a center portion, as about the nipple of the breast or the part of the iris surrounding the pupil of the eye.[/ul][/li][/quote]
OK, I think I got this one. We’re talking about tits, right? More precisely, nipples? And even more focused: the coloured area around the actual nipple?
Sheeeyit, the new words you learn on these boards, being a furrener and all that. I don’t even know what to call those in Dutch, fercryinoutloud. 
Is it weird? Probably not. I don’t like them too large myself, but then again, it’s all about proportion. Large breasts, large areolae. And since I don’t like huge breasts, huge areolae are not much to my liking either.
Hmmm… Not too weird really although I like quite the opposite. Catch plenty of shit though because I have a strong preference for small breasted women.
Personally, I find small, specialized, cushionlike areas from which hairs, glochids, spines, branches, or flowers may arise somewhat off-putting on a woman.
OK, I dare any of you guys to look some woman in the eye and tell her she has lovely areolae!
berdollos, I take that as a compliment! My ar·e·ole (âr-l) are larger than half dollars, and the nipps themselves are nearly 3/4" in diameter. While I have meduim sized breasts; I have always been proud of my ar·e·ole.
Just the sound of ar·e·ole rolling off my tongue, makes we want to burst into an operatic orgy. “ar·e·ole, ar·e·ole!”
Thank you for validating that for me…
Oh, your post fills me with lust! Mmmmmmm! I will spend all night dreaming of your splendiferous areolae! I will paint large paintings depicting what I would imagine your large areolae look like, and exhibit them in front of grocery stores! Everyone will ask me what my inspiration was, and I will tell them all about you and your super-wonderful boobies. I will become rich and famous from my paintings, and buy a big house full of brightly coloured furniture. It will be known as “Areolae Manor” and only the coolest people will be invited.
Wow!
Ummmm…
I don’t want to be a bitch here, but how can you tell what a woman’s areolae circumference is before you are attracted to her? And since she is ( I assume ) clothed when you meet her, if she has SMALL areolae when you make love, do you get turned off and dump her?
I mean, shouldn’t it matter more to you WHO she is and WHAT she thinks than how big her areolae are?
I refer you to the “small penis” thread. It SHOULD matter more who the physical body parts are attached to than the size or appearance of said physical parts.
IMHO.
Sheesh.
Scotti
I hate to sound weird, but it kinda turns me off if they’re big… I think that the nipple should be about a third of the diameter, or less. Of course, it’s not like it’s a huge part of it, just a kinda side benifit.
hell, i’m more of a face man myself. even if a girl has an incredible hot body, an ugly face just ruins it for me.
I can imagine your smooth as silk pick up lines.
“So you’re a cancer researcher and part time model. That’s all very interesting but tell me, is there any part of your body that is bigger than a tollhouse cookie and rhymes with oriole?”
“Wait come back!”
I agree with you in that this is not how things should be. But,if I sleep with a woman who is not my sexual ideal, there is less chance of a real deep attachment developing.
This is not the way things should be, but it is the way things are. With all the difficulties in relationships, a strong sexual attachment is a good thing. And, said to say, it is often based on physical appearance or even body parts.
I consider my wife absolutely stunning, and this is because of her physical appearance. I LOVE her for other reasons
such as her qualities of intelligence, compassion, friendship and the like.
In Dutch it’s tepelhof, halo, or areola. This Internet thing is amazing.
astro, that’s the best laugh I’ve had in ages. Thanks.
Quite the opposite, actually. One inch diameter, and well-delineated, suits me just fine.
Tepelhof! I did know that. Heh. Literally, it means “nipple garden”. Which is what it is.
Wow! I had no idea Dutch could be so poetic. That’s what I’m calling mine from now on.
[sub]yes, mine are large[/sub]
I’m not calling MINE nipple garden! It makes me picture a literal garden full of nipples on stems.
Very true. And the same for me is reverse. If she has a worse figure than a board, a hot face will still have me sold in a second.
<< I will tell them all about you and
your super-wonderful boobies. I will become rich and famous from my paintings, and buy a big house full of
brightly coloured furniture. It will be known as “Areolae Manor” and only the coolest people will be invited.>>
Mr. Snooopy; I hope you were being facetious! Some women (such as myself), have been led to believe we are somehow inferior for having less than gargantuan breasts. The OP specifically addressed areolae, and for once I could flaunt a breastal feature, which heretofore has been denied me.
While this thread was not intended as a ‘wet T-shirt’ contest, my contribution was on topic.
:::eyes narrow::: Are you dissing my areolae?? For the record, yes, they are spectacular!! Enjoy your mansion with all the ‘cool’ people. Sadly, I have a prior engagement that day…
:::double checks:::Yup, I’m all booked up that day!!