Rather than conflict, the two statements are in perfect alignment.
WHO we ARE and HOW we BEHAVE are separate and distinct. We are all special snowflakes - that hide how we are different (i.e. afraid to own it) because, in our sheepy way, we want to fit in and be accepted.
We are snowflakes, we behave like sheep.
People are afraid to be different and go against the group - why? Could it be because the group is seeking to enforce completely unimportant and superficial standards by shaming and mocking us when we fail to toe the line? Ya think?
I think you’re missing the point (unsurprisingly). If you decide to ‘let your freak flag fly’, then you must accept the consequences of that decision
And you are quite deliberately sidestepping the point entirely, also unsurprising: WHY must someone “accept the consequences”? WHY are those the consequences? WHY do so many people try to defend ugly behavior? WHY do you think it’s acceptable to shame and humiliate people for completely harmless things? Is a person bad for dressing funny/sloppy/slutty/stupid/weird? Do you believe that? And if the person in question is a good person, and being held up to ridicule is hurtful to them, why do they deserve to be hurt? And if they don’t deserve to be hurt, why would you defend people hurting them? Isn’t the larger injustice and evil in the people who hurt others who don’t deserve it because they feel like laughing? Do you think the laughter lasts and lingers and provides soul-deep benefit to offset the likely lingering pain that comes from being ridiculed?
and most people realize that that includes other people judging your choices.
Try to stop mixing different concepts, because it undermines your credibility.
Judgment is not the same as public ridicule and I am sure you know that. I have freely stated that I’m as likely to think someone is nuts for dressing a certain way as anyone. The difference is that I don’t think it’s acceptable to express it and I don’t agree that the person who dresses funny has “asked” for or deserves to be mocked and humiliated. I don’t think it’s ok and I would never in this life do what you and others are doing, which is arguing that there’s legitimacy in being cruel to people who have harmed no one by their behavior, and I think it’s positively freakish that you and others do!
You just keep arguing the same thing: “It’s gonna happen. You dress like that, people will act that way. YOu have to accept it. You asked for it. It will occur. People will behave that way. It’s on you to stop them from being mean to you by dressing yourself (or whatever) in a way that does not inspire people to behave like that. Your fault your fault your fault! I don’t have to look at why I act like this or want to be mean to you and disregard your feelings! I just do! Your fault! You MAKE ME!”
It’s the same insane argument that some men use for rape: you dressed like a slut! You know that men can’t help themselves! My inability to control MY bad behavior is on YOU to control and if you don’t, well, you asked for it!
Both arguments are 100% pure, unadulterated horseshit.
And then when people disagree with you and point out the logical flaws in your stance,
You be sure to show me when that happens, because the only thing offered so far has been completely illogical and self-sereving argument that people suck so we all need conform to avoid being bullied by the sucky people.
What crap.
I will continue to feel completely ok with my wacky idea that we could direct this collective power to shame the assholes who want to shame the harmless. I’m lettin’ that freak flag fly and I’m completely good with it.

