I don’t know how much credence I put in this assessment, though, since, although I hold the Tao Teh Ching in very high esteem, and consider it to be very influential in my personal philosophy, my “score” for Taoism (which I’ll admit I haven’t researched in any formal way,) is a mere 70% – 2% less than I got for SCIENTOLOGY! :eek: WTF?
My lowest match is for Roman Catholicism, (14%) which is too bad, since I really like the aesthetic, what with all the candles, incense, and ritual. I guess I’ll have to stick to neo-paganism (88%) for all that.
Hermeticism doesn’t even seem to be on the list – I guess it’s too arcane. Too bad, since I actually managed to produce the Philosopher’s Stone in 1999, after only twelve years of toil. I think that’s some sort of a record.
Interesting. I really didn’t “get” the whole bit about placing a priority on a selection. I mean, it seems to me that if it’s an article of faith, then all of them should be equal, ya know? Anyways my top three were:
Unitarian Universalism (100%)
Liberal Quakers (90%)
Neo-Pagan (90%)
Which is pretty accurate, I suppose, but on a bunch of the questions I had to pick the answer which was least inaccurate in describing my beliefs.
I was raised Lutheren so I find this response amusing:
8. Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (69%)
My bottom three were:
25. Roman Catholic (21%)
26. Seventh Day Adventist (9%)
27. Jehovah’s Witness (7%)
Which isn’t surprising, since I find many of their beliefs enigmatic to say the least.
Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (13%)
Jehovah’s Witness (9%)
Eastern Orthodox (7%)
Roman Catholic (7%)
I’m Pagan, so the results make a lot of sense to me… I don’t get the fact that Roman Catholic is the last on the list. IMO, they’re very into ceremony and ritual in the same way that a lot of Pagans are, but that’s a whole 'nother kettle of fish I’m not going to stir up right now.
Thanks, but I was aware of the term and its usage - I was just commenting on the illogic of the term - “pagan” meant not “not sharing the Jewish/Muslim/Christian history” - how does one become a “neo-pagan”? I am not a “slightly-revised Hindu” or a “modified Buddhist”.
As an athiest, I thought it silly to take the test, but I figured I’d do it for kicks, and at least answer the ethics questions even though I gave the pat no-god answers on the first part (metaphysics/theology.)
Nontheist (100%)
Theravada Buddhism (90%)
Unitarian Universalism (89%)
Secular Humanism (87%)
Mahayana Buddhism (36%)
Jainism (33%)
Seventh Day Adventist (33%)
New Age (31%)
Orthodox Quaker (25%)
How they can tell all that just from my answers to the ethics questions I don’t know, but they couldn’t have been matching on the metaphysics questions because those questions all included a no-god option.
Well, I’m Wiccan (neo-pagan), but for a lot of the questions I answered “none of the above” since I believe other things or combinations of the answers. But Liberal Quaker? Hmm… sounds fishy. My ancestor, Mary Dire, was hung for being a Quaker.
Eonwe said, “All the non-theistic options are really anti-religious, IMO.”
What other definition could you have for people who don’t believe in a god? That doesn’t mean they don’t want anyone else to worship as they choose. It’s just not something everyone buys into.
Actually is this the same site that was knocking around here a few years ago. Wasn’t it backed by the Unitarian Universalists or something like that. A lot of people are getting that belief system (or lack of one as the case may be)?