Guys, it looks like he’s right. I just took this out our front door.
I never said I was going anywhere
They don’t say trailer trash for nothing
Ha ha!
That’s Mr. Trailer Trash to you, sonny. You need to learn to respect your elders.
So, really, Meiers believers, you don’t see any problem with what you accept as “fact”, and what you dismiss as “not fact”?
Breaks me up, if you’re real.
Unless you vote…
Consider this evidence with all other information combined as you can only appreciate it when you have dealt with the entirety of the information and piece together the pieces of the jigsaw puzzle.
Much as it applies in any court of law you bring together all available evidence you can get your hands on and use it make your case either to prosecute or defend.
Elder? how fucking old are ya to claim respect from someone who might just be older than you son!
Because thinking that calling someone trailer trash is a major insult is about as juvenile as you can get.
Not to mention your lack of capitalization and punctuation.
What the fuck
You need to deal with the facts as it is presented before you make up your mind in any case
A lot hinges on the proof material and evidence and without it the case is closed.
Now the evidence itself has to be dealt with in a painstaking manner for it veracity and legitimacy.
You’ve got to ask as an investigator how real is this, what are its flaws and why and how does it make sense if it is real.
You test it to reality by being logical and impartial without prejudice in order to arrive at the truth of the matter until you can unequivocally prove that it is either a fraud or genuine.
Corroboration is the key and in case of the witness testimony, the more unrelated the witness is to the principle in question without coercive force or self interest the more weight it has although personal bias does come into play.
There are many independent eyewitnesses who never knew Billy Meier who claims to have seen UFO in the vicinity of where Meier lives.
I didn’t call anybody a trailer trash
I was referring to the con job of that photo you’ve put up and it happened to be in a trailer park.
got it?
Now why are you calling that a con job? It’s just as real as any photo Meier put up.
The only difference is everybody knows mine is a joke.
Right, OK. And when someone says “I had real evidence, but I can’t give it to you now, because the aliens came back and substituted fake evidence, which I hadn’t noticed until just now, when you pointed out to me that the pictures of aliens were dancers on a TV variety show, no, really!” that works for you, huh?
Ever hear of Occam’s Razor?
*The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim, and is not upon anyone else to disprove. The inability, or disinclination, to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever. However it is important to note that we can never be certain of anything, and so we must assign value to any claim based on the available evidence, and to dismiss something on the basis that it hasn’t been proven beyond all doubt is also fallacious reasoning.
Example: Bertrand declares that a teapot is, at this very moment, in orbit around the Sun between the Earth and Mars, and that because no one can prove him wrong, his claim is therefore a valid one."*
Since you are essentially asking us to believe in the orbiting teapot on the basis of shlock non-evidence, you remain stuck in fallacy-land.
Well I gathered that but who the fuck is joking here, not that I am in the mood for it.
It isn’t comparable nor insinuatory with your reference
Also, to this: You need to deal with the facts as it is presented before you make up your mind in any case.
I would add, we unavoidably also build upon facts previously established. It has been well established that hoaxers can fool the gullible. therefore, that hypothesis should be considered first. You seem quite secure that despite all of our debunking and evidence that this is a hoax, that you are not gullible, you’re just one of the few that has accepted ‘the truth’.
It is probable to the point of certainty, based upon the evidence of this thread, that you are, in fact, being gullible.
Just who is qualified to be an investigator? How do we find such an individual?
BTW I would counsel patience. From your posts, I gather it took quite a while for you to be convinced. Yet, you seem to want us to accept that Billy is telling the truth right away.
Did aliens provide you with this interesting new vocabulary you keep introducing to the rest of us?
Bullshit!
People who won’t deal with the evidence and proof material presented are the ones in the la la land of denial making all the fallacious arguments when they know that their position rests on reductio ad absurdum without a logical premise based on evidence of absence
I can’t. I had them implanted when the Beta Reticuloids gave me a time-travel trip to ancient Babylon, and I didn’t keep the receipt.
Although in my defense, the receipt looked likethis, which was really hard to fit in my wallet.
No you can only convince yourself not by the need or want but by the truth of the evidence presented.
If I accused you of killing someone, does that make you a killer?
If you accuse Billy of being a fraud you have to prove it with evidence just as I have to prove that you have killed someone if I am to make my case.