I mean what does that say about the Billy Meier case, Huh!?
Do you think that anybody on the face of this planet except for a very few would continue their hoax if it was a hoax to put their lives on the line for basically nothing.
Not only that but why would the authorities even bother to assassinate someone who was carrying out a hoax
There has to be a very good reason for them to silence Billy Meier anyway they can to suppress information which they deem to be very important enough to warrant such an action.
Well if you can’t accept it just leave it at that for surely when the earthquake right under the city of Rome decimates the Vatican, you will be reminded that someone did mention something about it and don’t say that Billy meier didn’t tell anyone.
Then you would know very well how a volcano with its chamber connected to the city over 100 miles away will do to the city above it when it sets off an earthquake.
Thank you once again for your views given in honesty
Even if you aren’t convinced on the authenticity of the Billy Meier case I am profoundly impressed with the level of maturity you have displayed here which is very rare nowadays.
Now with the issue of proselytizing, I am not here to do such a thing even if it may appear at the outset to be contradictory.
My interest is in telling it like it is about the Billy meier case for the truth that it is without imposing it upon anybody else as in the end every human being can only convince himself of the truth and nobody else can do it for him.
My actions on this forum should not be misconstrued by anyone as me trying to convince anybody of anything nor am I pushing it down people’s throats just because i support Billy Meier and state facts about the case
There are so much lies being bandied about here and I feel that it necessitates a direct intervention to balance out the negatives by telling it like it is.
I knew even before I started participating on this forum what the proverbial response was going to be but my message isn’t for those who have already made up their minds.
By the response I have gotten so far which I didn’t expect any different, the status quo will remain for some time.
The important thing is that the the Billy Meier’s contact with ET case will speaks for itself in due time when people are mature enough to actually do their honest investigation of the study and not becaue I said so.
But this doesn’t state in no way why it isn’t impossible for a volcanic eruption of Mt Vesuvius to either go off due to an earthquake in Rome or alternatively to set off the earthquake after an eruption.
We gave it to you. I’m beginning to suspect you weren’t really sincere in considering our feedback, and I’m hurt. In any case, the verdict here on the Dope appears to be “Utter Bullshit”.
Case now closed. You requested a verdict. Accept the verdict you requested.
Well, yes, it’s like asking what happens when the unicorns living in Buckingham Palace decide to come out to play. The problem isn’t deciding what games they play. The problem is supposing they exist in the first place. Likewise, supposing this magma chamber exists at all is quite laughable.
Besides, where is such a magma chamber? Because there certainly isn’t one under Rome, as our measurements can confirm.
I’ll note you haven’t bothered to address the actual point - the existence of a magma chamber - and have chosen to employ a distraction.
So, can you please address the fundamental point: are these supposed aliens wrong? Or is there some other seemingly rational explanation for their inexplicable decision to state unequivocally that not only does such a magma exist but also their snarky declaration that scientists are simply incapable of detecting it?
You are not paying attention. I m not “fixated” on the letter J; it is simply the first bit of evidence in this thread in which I have particular knowledge to bring to the discussion.
You want me to invest time and energy reading all this wondrous stuff. Yet, as soon as I begin to read it, I find it promoting a falsehood. It really does not matter if is false because the author is an idiot or because the author is a liar. If what he publishes is false, I have no reason to believe any other crap he claims. Now, we are beginning to see other texts on areas where I have knowledge and instead of stupid and easily avoided errors about language, I am finding stupid and deliberate lies. Telling me that Meier has been given some great truth to revea is silly when he is wrong for every “fact” he claims that I already know.
If someone tried to sell you a prophecy that began by talking about pink oceans and how the noses on the Swiss were on the backs of their heads, would you believe that person because they claimed tohave some “Trruth” or dismiss them as a crackpot or a liar? When Meier makes stupid mistakes (or lies) about language or records “interviews” with "ET"s that lie about history, I have no interest in seeing how many more “mistakes” or lies he has published.
To be fair, newinitiation didn’t post the OP, TheBodhi did, and now has disappeared. Newinitiation has bravely grasped the falling banner and thrust it forward…