now Powell via Woodward
confirm what educated people had deduced and discussed on the state of the evidence, sure.
But what do we find, Bluesman, who made repeated efforts to deceive people on this board about the evidence, often indiscriminantly using bold type, pr#ofa*&ni!ty and UPPER CASE LETTERING, Bluesman who dishonestly exploited his inside knowledge to misrepresent the fabled WMD intelligence, Bluesman, who took the favoured flame-out and run tactic, so typically cowardly of his ilk, Bluesman, has signed on as a Charter Member.
To quote the man:
Abides my ass! 100% see-through on your flimsy lies. Come out from hiding and tell us again I am the authority! Woncha.
I know it is the pit, but jeez man, Bluesman is in the service of the US of A. Grant him that. It’s a lot more than me, for example, that takes it in the shorts for taxes but that’s about it.
That said, I would like Bluesman to either clarify those earlier statements or say security prevents him from doing so. Maybe the Bluesman saw bad data but took it in good faith. Hell, the American electorate did much the same.
Bluesman is neither honorable nor co-deceived. He claimed first hand knowledge of evidence, evidence mind you, not analysis that answered the question definitively.
With Dr Kay’s final revelation imminent and known to him in advance he flamed out of the board in a apparently final vomit of hate and mendacity. Did so in order to avoid accounting for his assertions in the face of damning facts.
And now has the audacity to return. Well the sneak’s back and it’s accounting time.
Since I know Bluesman IRL, you are cordially invited to go fuck yourself. I don’t kno the evidence that he had or what he was told, but I know him and his character, and he would never, ever, do anything contrary to the interests of this country or in any way state anything that he himself did not believe to be true.
He is a patriot, serving his country for measly pay and the ingratitude of ungrateful, sniveling left-wing trash like you.
You may argue with his politics, but don’t you DARE attack his honor or his character.
At the very least there can no argument that he was, at best, incorrect? It’s been about a year, surely if the secret evidence he referenced has turned out to be valid, it would have come out by now?
Is there any reasonably plausible scenario where it was true and we would not have heard about it by now?
I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that he was working from bad info, and not lying. I just hope those who backed him because of his position can now see that this type of claim, even from someone allegedly “in the know”, isn’t proof-positive.
limited vocab, my aunt Agatha. Simple AngloSaxon expletives are all that;s required to dismiss assmonkeys like you. And I’m nobody’s lieutenant–I am, however, someone who sticks up for his friends.
I’m curious how you even know of the debate on Bluesman’s claims or that in your POV he has “come back”, since judging by your signup date of January 2004, you weren’t even around for last year’s heated debates…
Good point, and one that I will remember for future claims.
sevastopol, what gobear said. I’ve also had the privilege of meeting the Bluesclan. Suffice it to say that having met Bluesman, I can say that he is not a 60-year-old Jewish woman, nor do I have any particular reason to doubt that he is who he says he is.
So, speaking as a friend of the Bluesclan, kindly go fuck yourself.