Boobies or not..what a stinker.

Maybe because I’m on muscle relaxants for my back…but damn this Playboy playmate selection show on Fox is a freakin’ joke. I remember hearing about this awhile back…but honestly did not make plans to watch it…however I caught it surfing. Is it me …or is this so frickin ridiculous that it makes The Bachelor look like good drama.

WHY DO THEY LET THESE “WOMEN” TALK?

That is all.

Thank You.

Just to prove that they can.

They can? I didn’t notice.

Barely. Juuuust barely.

Heh heh. You said “can.”

and you wondered who the intended audience was?

Teenagers

I’m a heterosexual single guy-and I could only stand about 5 minutes of that before I had to turn it. Oy vay.

“Boobies or not”? I keep hearing mention of boobies on tv lately but I don’t watch tv and no one will ever answer my question: do they actually show bare breasts on network TV now?

Dude, two words:

Mute button.

Cisco-
Nope, they don’t, AFAIK…

Cisco, they have on occasion but it is extremely rare in the US. I have seen nippleage on Once and Again, and on CSI- but I doubt the playboy show they are discussing showed nekkid titties.

Hi, I’m new here, and this may not be the best way to introduce myself, but I am a little surprised that you’re so hard on the women in that show. I haven’t seen it myself, but it seems like if you watch it you’re probably not watching it for the discussion, right?

I happened to run across it while channel surfing. I tried to surf past it but somehow I always ended up going back to it. It was a ridiculous and annoying show but, being a heterosexual male, sometimes my choices are driven by things other than the search for intellectual stimulation. :smiley:

Like I mentioned in the OP, I didn’t set out to watch it…I caught it while surfing. Like a lot of other “reality” shows, they flipped back and forth from the selection process/photography of the women, to “reaction” comments by the same said women.

You’re actually “surprised” that I made negative comments about what these shallow, self centered bimbos said?

I wasn’t “expecting” anything…since I didn’t make actual plans to watch this thing. That being said, usually the purpose of these “reaction” comments on shows like Survivor…the Real World…the Bachelor and their ilk, is to gain some insight into the people are like. If these women were that shallow, it seemed like a sure waste of a good lavalier mic pack.

Okay…

I only watched half an hour or so of it.

I basically figured out what I’d know all along: Hugh Hefner is an extremely rich man who likes to have beautiful women pose naked for his magazine.

“You’re actually “surprised” that I made negative comments about what these shallow, self centered bimbos said?”

Sorry, beagledave, but I wasn’t talking specifically about you–just the whole thread made that kind of impression. Seems obvious to me my comment wasn’t just about you. Yet you call the women on the show “self centered.” Kinda funny.

I doubt they had much to say, sure. But nobody tunes in to that kind of show to hear women say smart things. They tune in to look at the tits (however much is visible) and call the women bimbos. I’m just not into that. I like women and think even the “bimbos” get a raw deal. I mean, hell, that’s probably why they’re bimbos.

Since I authored the OP, and you used the word “you’re”, sorry if it wasn’t “obvious” to whom you were referring. :rolleyes: A free piece of advice. If you are referring to the comments of an entire group of posters in a thread, rather than the OP…it might help to use clearer language (as in “you all”…or “all of you”…or “those who are criticizing these women”)

Heh. So they got a “raw deal”…why? They knowlingly volunteered to be part of a bunny hunt, and probably signed a gazillion release forms. What exactly happened to them that created a “raw deal” for them?

I also take it from your comments (“I’m just not into that”)that you did not watch the show to which I am referring…so you can form opinions on how they acted…how?

Ah, Beagle… as much as I love you, I’m gonna have to chime in here. I had this very conversation with Mr. Kitty earlier.

I caught the last half hour, as they were going from 7 to 3. And let me preface my comments with this: these women volunteered for this, and as such should have expected a certain level of… shall we say… humiliation. After all, what can you expect when you team up Hef with Fox? And for crying out loud… these women were not the most stable creatures in the world- going positively hysterical because you weren’t chosen to spread your legs for millions of people? ::sigh::

But in no way did they deserve Hef and the photographers trashing them on national television. A simple “nope, not her… nope, not what we’re looking for…” would have sufficed. But Jesus Tapdancing CHRIST, no woman- regardless of how much of an attention hound she is- deserves to have thousands of people hear the following…

“She’s a bit thick in the body…”

“It’s all about symmetry, and the lower half of her face simply isn’t as symmetrical as the top half…”

“You really have to work to find her good angle…”

“Her torso is too long…”

“Her legs aren’t long enough…”

and what had to be, with the possible exception of “She’s a bit thick in the body,” the most cruel thing they could have come up with…

“There’s nothing about her that makes her unique.”

I cringed during these snippets. Ugh. That was just too much.

And the girl who won… shouldn’t have. Guess I’ll be skipping the July centerfold.

-BK

Thanks for the tip, beagledave. I’m finding out more about how these boards work.

“Heh. So they got a “raw deal”…why? They knowlingly volunteered to be part of a bunny hunt, and probably signed a gazillion release forms. What exactly happened to them that created a “raw deal” for them?”

One thing I’m noticing about these boards is that people here are very big on the law. If you sign a form, you are in for whatever you get. Or so seems to be a common opinion here. That doesn’t seem very open-minded to me. Have I been misdirected to these boards? I was told they’re a good place to interact with freethinking types. But I consider freethinking types to be able to see past the law when there are other issues at stake.

“I also take it from your comments (“I’m just not into that”)that you did not watch the show to which I am referring…so you can form opinions on how they acted…how?”

I didn’t watch it. But I did read the comments here. And though I used to be interested in porn, I got to know some damn smart women who made me think of it differently, and now I’m a lot more interested in what people say about it and women in general. That’s what I meant by “raw deal.” bobkitty’s post, for instance, makes me think how fucked up we’d all be if we started parading around like that trying to live up to some big idea and somebody said “Nothing makes him unique.” I don’t think I’m unique, but I sure as shit don’t want to hear somebody else talking about me like that.
Even if I signed a form.