As everybody else in this thread, I am really sorry for your loss and it was an awful situation.
I would also like to say I was glad to finally read a commentary like rilchiam’s… I was trying to figure out how to say basically the same thing.
Without hijacking a very important thread, I think it should also be pointed out that the reason his “friends” (i put that in quotes not because I think something in that thread really shows otherwise, but because I know how irc acquantainceship works and it’s not always clear) waited so long to call for help was not just from perhaps not entirely understanding how bad his situation was.
They also didn’t want to get their “friend” in trouble. Again, I know in this case that really shouldn’t have been a question, but they didn’t understand that at the time.
I don’t know exactly what the laws are in terms of somebody recovering from an accidental overdose of substances they shouldn’t have possessed, but I know from experience that there often a decision to be made, weighing the possibility of serious health problems vs the perceived certainty of legal problems. It seems to me that if a person survives the ordeal, the law should be such that he goes to counseling but does not face drug charges or wahtever else might be involved.
Any punishment doled out for the purpose of disusading a repeat performance would be completely insignificant next to actually having gone through the experience. If you’re irresponsible enough to do it again (presumably what the punishment was trying to prevent) what is the likelihood that you might actually let the law convince you when you’ve already ignored an infinitely more fearsome recollection.
Of course I can’t say whether or not an earlier call would have made a difference in this case, but it certainly can in many others. If the foreboding shadow of legal repercussions isn’t hanging over a friend’s – or the actual user’s – decision, it seems certain that they will take the necessary action sooner than in the current system.
as an extra note… there would likely be other punishments involved, by parents or other loved ones, that may also be hanging over the decision, but it still seems that removing the legal issues from the equation can make the difference.
those who made the substances available illegally should be held responsible for what they did if this is possible, but their actions constitute drug dealing or unlawful prescription, not murder or some such inflated charge, unless they were egging that person to their death… but that’s a whole 'nother matter entirely, and completely outside of the scope of this thread (I just threw it in in attempt to cover all the bases)
If any of this came off as callous or cold-blooded, I apologize sincerely. I am truly, truly sorry for your loss and extend to you all my sympathy (I’m really not just saying that, i swear). I just think there is more to be said that could perhaps take something positive from this tragic event.
-keith