Brit Dope Winter 2003

I won’t beat you up (who wants to be denied baked goods? plus it’s not nice), but Shade is correct; Vanya is a diminutive of Ivan. Although not being a comparative Anglo-Saxon/Slavic linguist, I couldn’t begin to tell you the relationship between the name Ivan and the name Ian. Ivan translates to John. When you get really drunk, you can call your Ivan Vanyusha. It’s strictly a masculine name, in spite of the -a ending. Sasha, however, can be a nickname either for Alexander or Alexandra.

(Mom says when she was pregnant with me, she read lots of big, fat Russian novels; since I’m the eldest, she knew it would be the last time before retirement she’d have the time for that sort of thing. It explains a lot. The bigger novels sometimes come with a chart in the front that lists all the characters’ various nicknames.)

Oh, and I don’t know why Vanyas tend to be the buffoon/idiot. If your prof has any insights on that, I’d love to hear them.

Aaah… So Vanya is a diminutive of Ivan. Ivan translates to John, and Ian is the Scottish for John. Hence Vanya does (more or less) equal Ian. :smiley:

I will have to ask my Polish prof as to why Vanyas tend to be the buffoons, but I think its fairly amusing, given the number of Ians that I know. :smiley:

Hence, by this logic, Ians are buffoons. :smiley: :smiley: :smiley:

Wow, I was right! The only drawback is that my given name is ‘Jack’ which is traditionally a form of ‘John’ so I’m apparently a buffoon too. But you probably already knew that :smiley:

Bwahahaha! :smiley:

I’m surrounded by Ians, or variants thereof. Funnily enough, I don’t know that many “Johns” :smiley:

Why is this worth a :D? Is it just habit for us to end every sentance with a smilie? :slight_smile:

I dunno. I just think that its rather strange that I know at least 6 Ians. But only one or two Johns…

Who knows. Maybe I’m just high on caffienne.

High on caffeine, low on sugar, drunk on beer, so many ways to make a person more interesting :slight_smile:

I know a couple of Johns/Jons (including one “John Minus h”) but no Jacks. Which is getting confusing as the new wave of younger Jacks catches me up, as I’m not used to not turning round when someone says “Jack” :slight_smile:

Are you prophesising my state on the 27th and at the BritDope? Cause it’s probably going to be accurate. And then I shall explain star formation to you all.

Are you suggesting caffeine, sugar and beer? :eek:

But you’ve already explained star formation. I I think I can figure out for myself that there has to be some stuff that you do something to :slight_smile:

At the BritDope at any rate. Look, we will be in a pub, hence beer. I am going to be baking various things, including chocolate covered espresso bean cookies, hence caffeine and sugar :smiley:

:stuck_out_tongue: In which case I shall explain WAT formation at the LonDope. If someone asks me.

Does excess sugar have the same effect as deficient sugar? :eek:

OK guys, however drunk you get no-one mention tails :slight_smile:

No, with lots of sugar, I bounce!! :smiley:

My research happens to be interesting, if not Earth shatteringly important.

I should hope that the stars you study aren’t earth-shattering. That would be bad.

And ‘interesting’ to you, or ‘interesting’ as in people in pubs don’t knaw their own arms off to get away? Not that I’m implying you weren’t aware of the difference, but you have to be careful - we caught a natsci last night and explained the axiom of choice to her, and well, it was bad :slight_smile:

(FTR my second choice of response was “so, what are WATs?” but I thought I would save that for the 'fest.)

I don’t do stars.

Err… pass. :smiley:

That’s just evil.

I’ve been known to have perfectly reasonable conversations about my research, down the pub, with non-astrophysicists.

As the bishop said to the actress.

She was asking for it. Literally - I can’t remember exactly what happened, but she did bring it up :slight_smile:

Yeah, me too. But it’s not as funny :slight_smile:

I think, that at every DopeFest I’ve attended I’ve managed to get into a conversation about what I do. Last time, I think I managed to convince people that I was a useful, contributing member of society :smiley:

Can you show me that trick? I know a pure maths department that would be very grateful.

At the DopeFest. The only problem with the argument is that it takes a certain level of drunkenness to:

a) say with a straight face
b) for it to make any sense to anyone else.

I bet being cute helps as well.

Come to think of it drunkeness would help there too :slight_smile: