FYI London, I was not in the mood to expound upon all the details, though I was aware of all of them, thanks chap. I was quite in a ruch when I wrote it and did not want to sound like an uptight bucktoothed Brit. But since you have crossed that fine line ever so swiftly, I have but one thing to say: Chinga tu madre, ol’ pal. That’s the Queen to you.
Oh, and as for defending that sorry excuse for a monarchial figure, I have but one question: Wasn’t King Henry VIII a full on hypocrite, as he est. The Church of England under the premises that Catholicism was too strict, then severely punished those who had radical religious views??? And didn’t I est. this thread in order to criticize ultraconservative and hypocritical people/religions?
So let me get this straight, are you defending this prick on the premises that he’s a Brit, that I merely omitted some info., or that you agree with his religious views? Hmmm?
Oh, grow up runforrestrun. People point out you may have taken the site too seriously and your reaction is to reach for the immature stereotype toolbox? Give us a break.
runforrestrun - Defending the marital arrangements of Henry VIII ? hardly :eek:
I simply thought it might be helpful to point out you were plain wrong about both the polygamy and the (slightly curious) ‘Brits are Mormons’ assertions, especially given the board is supposed to be fighting ignorance.
That you now claim to know you were wrong when you made them but wrote it anyway because you didn’t want to sound like “a uptight bucktoothed Brit” is wholly understandable in the context of your OP.
London ‘I love to eat apples through a tennis racket’ Calling
It’s the first freaking thread I’ve ever posted. Take it easy, damn it! Okay, you’re right and I’m wrong. You happy? It just goes to prove that Cecil has his work cut out for him.
All hail the omnipotent Brits. masses of monks bows in awe
:eek: