Recently posted in another thread, in my opinion, as justificationf for Bush’s crass use of failure to find WMD as a basis for humor:
"No common sense? No Discretion? Call me when he gets a hummer in the oval office from a low level functionary, and we’ll talk discretion. "
and in various forms, posted a multitude of times here and elsewhere.
I have a question. Does anybody believe that Clinton’s BJ was the first or last that will or has happened in the Oval Office? I don’t, power is an aphrodisiac, IMO.
And WTF kind of logic does Clinton’s BJ have to do with justifying anything that Bush does or does not do?
(I know this has been beaten to death but this is my turn with the whip)
Lying about cheating on your wife is a felony. OK, I’ll take the risk. What horseshit.
And you go ahead and take the “larger view” - “leave it to history,” that is something not available to the Americans dying in Iraq. And the Iraqi’s dying in Iraq.
Well, lying in front of a grand jury is normally considered perjury which is a felony.
Nonetheless, giving the amount of invective directed towards Clinton’s lie and the amount directed towards Bush’s, it’s still up to history to show which is the lie which turns out to have more effect on people’s lives.
I’m just a caveman, but I’m still totally missing what county getting a break has to do with Clinton getting a blow job and George W. Bush being an idiot.
Some conservatives just can’t seem to get over Clinton’s blowjob. They keep imagining it and imagining it, until it almost seems to them that they are right there, giving or getting said blowjob. Denied direct sexual expression by their sexually conservative mores, they feel they can think about Clinton’s blowjob because it has entered the political arena, so they think about it … constantly … with one hand in their pants. Sad, but true.