I was going to let this die, but I must say that I am delighted to find out that even conservatives cannot distinguish their beliefs from satire.
By ‘there is an ongoing debate’, they mean that Andy or one of his minions suggested it and they talk about it. In much the same way that they decided there was a debate about if Dawkins was a professor at Oxford or not. Oxford says yes, Andy S says no. His page was cluttered on there for a long time with Andy’s ramblings about how Dawkins wasn’t ‘really’ a professor.
A few years ago, when I first visited Conservapedia, I could not believe the twisted mentality of some of those contributors.
For example, here’s an early version of the Albert Einstein page.
By visiting Conservapedia we learn the real facts about science and not the contrived doctrine that is spewed forth by those liberal, politically correct, homosexual agenda, pro-abortion, evolution believing professors.
Here’s some interesting Conservapedia “facts” about relativity:
Well, I’m glad all that got straightened out.
Perhaps those “facts” were a “whoosh” made by a Conservapedia member who wanted to vandalize the site a bit. However, since that is one of the first postings (and considering the Barrack Obama article) it’s not too much of a stretch that the author of that article really believed that crap. :mad:
Conservapedia is awesome in its stupidity. I was feeling almost mesmerized by the articles but I managed to pull myself away before too many brain cells died, I hope.
I love this entry in the references in the Wikipedia entry for Conservapedia
Oh, and I love Uncyclopedia. Another fine site to waste my days 
RickQ
Heck, Uncyclopedia is great and I go there to get some good laughs. However, unlike Conservapedia, the Uncyclopedia is written to be funny intentionally.
Any time someone cites the Association of American Physicans and Surgeons in an approving manner, it’s a good indication they are heavily into nutbaggery.
The AAPS is a fringe group of Arizona-based far-right nincompoops who among other things are heavily anti-vaccine, don’t believe in shaken baby syndrome (it’s caused by vaccines, doncha know) and promote a bunch of other goofy ideas through their “scientific journal” (which is so pathetic that the NCI’s Pub Med database doesn’t even index its articles). The following take on the AAPS from RationalWiki is a wee bit over the top, but basically on target:
“The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons is a small group of “conservative” quacks, cranks and fundamentalist zealots which likes to rail against such timeless evils as abortion, vaccination and the idea of universal health care coverage. It is sufficiently batshit insane to have retained Andrew Schlafly as its general counsel and is strongly suspected of consuming their own newborn infants.”
The Obama"mind control" stuff is just the latest indication of how far over the edge they are.
Isn’t he supposedly gayer than a picnic basket and so far back in the closet he’s got an audience with Aslan?
My personal favorites?
-Walter Cronkite
-J. Edgar Hoover (Notice how short it is, and how it omits his alleged homosexuality and cross-dressing fetish)
-Ronald Reagan
-United Nations
-Oscar Romero
-Jimmy Carter
-Augusto Pinochet
Their catagory on Psychology is pretty far out.
And of course, the previously linked Wiki entry for Conservapedia.
No, that’s Phyllis’ other son, John.
Ah, thank you.
I think I like that Czolgolz guy-he should be a Doper: