Can the Democrats win the Alabama senate special election in December?

I found this at the Hill link:

:eek::confused:

ETA: Also:

I’m waiting for it to come in the mail.

All the waiters in your grand cafe
Leave their tables when you blink
Every dog must have his everyday
Every perv must have his nymphette
Don’t wait for answers
Just take your chances
Don’t ask me why

Has Hannity spoken up today or is he waiting until after he demonstrates that waterbaording isn’t torture?

And, two more women have just come forward with stories of Moore harassing and assaulting them.

The man went to the girls school, met her at the principal’s office, and asked her out.

Errr; not quite, JohnT. There’s no need to embellish the details:

The mind boggles.

Oh, well, he has experience with things not going well for him:

You, in the back row? You have a question? Please speak up"

“That date when Trenton Rogers Garmon, Esq. had his law license suspended by order of the Alabama Supreme Court? Wasn’t that during Roy Moore’s tenure as Chief Justice?”

Why, yes. Yes, it was.

Chasing hearses is a lot easier, they don’t roll as fast as ambulances. I mean, they hit the siren and the gas, they gone!

The same way a CEO is in the wrong for having consensual sex with an intern. It’s a power thing. Most CEOs would lose their job under similar circumstances. FTR not saying it’s right if 100% consensual but it is a double standard.

Trying to find the Senate Rules on expulsion. Is it concurrence of 2/3 of the members or of those voting?

ETA: Saw a reference that it is 2/3 of voting but not the actual rule

Heard one option the GOP is considering is to get Luther Strange to resign to trigger another special election, which would buy them some time and [hopefully] a shiny new candidate.

Rick Hansen thinks this would violate the 17th Amendment

Apparently Garmon heard that Moore’s career was dead and swooped in.

If someone says these accusers are paid to make the stories up, this is a good refutation. How could anyone make *that *one up?

Another point is that an invented accusation would more probably include actual rape. Why stop short?

As soon as Moore’s approval rating drops into the teens, he’ll try to fuck it.

It’s not a Senate rule, it’s in Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution. “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behavior, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.”

I would read that as two thirds of the members of that house of Congress. My Google-fu is weak this morning, though, and I can’t turn up any confirmation of that.

This is just mind-boggling to me, if true. The optics are terrible. And I think it would likely go to court.

They don’t care about the optics. All that matters is keeping the seat in the party. If it goes to court, it will not be decided on the merits of the case, it will be decided based on what’s best for the party.