I think the fact that they’re similar but not identical has the ring of truth. It would be hard for all these people to independently come up with stories that are similar but just different enough to show that they aren’t just copycatting what someone else said.
The other thing is, why would these women lie about Bill Cosby in particular, if their goal is to squeeze money out of someone? Anyone who has been around Hollywood has encountered other rich, blackmail-able men, and probably a lot who would be much more believable as skeevy casting-couch guys. Why would you pick someone who you know people have such a good opinion of that you know they won’t believe you? And why would you make it part of the story that they were helping you with jobs & tuition money and stuff? It just doesn’t add up.
There are certain parallels between the Cosby situation and the Jerry Sandusky case from a while back. A respected person engaging in long-running sexual abuse, whispered suspicions and rumors and a seemingly oblivious wife in denial.
The adamant deniers in the threads also had similar arguments. Any small discrepancy meant all claims were bogus. I’m reminded of a Dave Chappelle sketch where he’s in jury selection for the R. Kelly trial saying what evidence would convince him of Kelly’s guilt:
I was an active participant in the Paterno thread, and I don’t recall a single poster claiming that all claims against Sandusky were bogus, using the argument that you assert was used or any other arguments.
If you can provide a cite for your claim I’d be interested.
It certainly rings a bell, but it was not a claim that “all claims were bogus”, let alone a claim that “any small discrepancy meant all claims were bogus”.
One thing is sure: if someone gets to the bottom of this story, it won’t be the media, the journalists or anyone in the public. Like in most scandals, the truth rarely comes out when there are too many parties interested in the outcome.
Could you provide a link to what you’re talking about? You seem to be implying that Kathie Lee Gifford made a claim against Cosby. I did a quick search to see what you saw. This is what I found:
"…and then I unlocked my adjoining door and he unlocked his adjoining door and he banged me like a cobbler working a shoe on his bench till the cock crowed. Frank? Frank had nothing on The Ole Cos- and Cos fed me ‘Happy Sauce’ drinks all night. "
One media outlet didn’t include on opposing viewpoint! Cosby is innocent! Regardless of the fact that the boyfriend’s doesn’t do more than provide a little doubt on Johnson’s story. There’s still all the other accusations that are unrelated to each other.
I think this is really going to backfire on Cosby. This does not look like the behavior of a wrongly accused innocent person. If all the accusations weren’t enough, this makes him look like a complete bastard.
What if there are victims out there who would fall within the statute of limitations and open the door to a criminal prosecution? Could this be a desperate attempt to dissuade them from coming forward?
I think it’s a good strategy. Kinda similar to going negative with political ads. Make people think that both sides are wrong.
I still think the accusations are false, but he’s already been crucified in the media and found guilty. Exposing these women for what they are won’t hurt him more.