Oh, my - that is so true
He admits he’s not normal. As for problem… well, yes and no. Problem for him is that there is no legal way for him to indulge his desires. Problem for the rest of us is our concern he might one day go ahead and try it anyway.
Neither is paedophilia.
Anyone who may still be on the fence as to if you’re being trolled or not, consider the following.
Those who have come to the conclusion that Cesario is a troll, please do the right thing and stop feeding him.
Enjoy,
Steven
Correction: there are no merits. So, presuming there are some is indeed tantamount to approval (or at least condoning). There aren’t 2 sides to having sex with children, no matter how hard Cesario tries to get us to understand his terrible hardship in restraining himself.
I missed the edit window.
Even though he has said that he is sure he could get away with having sex with children?
To quote John Lennon: How do you sleep?
Whatever, whichever. I said my piece. Truly I begin to see why conservatives think so poorly of liberals. There are no lines, never mind bright ones, nothing that is not acceptable or tolerable. What a crock.
I am not about to attempt to explain why playing doctor is normal and an adult having sex with a child is not, Cesario. You have shown that you are incapable of discussing this distasteful topic in anything but a hectoring, baiting manner and you are convinced that you are correct and that society is merely blinded by prejudice. Pedophilia is not your father’s homosexuality. You and others like you are not going to find society changing its mind about your “need” for pleasure. Cry me a river.
Requirements 3, 4, and 5 all relate to this, though requirement 3 is the most relevent, I think.
It largely resembled the straw-man you’ve managed to construct here of me.
For the record, other boards I’m on have banned the topic outright, and we’ve gotten along wonderfully. If no one’s spreading lies about it, I don’t need to correct those lies, after all.
I appreciate that you respect that.
I really was trying to lighten the mood with that line. Sadly, my humor doesn’t translate well into forum text, apparently.
Neither is a post-menopausal woman, yet they manage to get by. Either use your imagination or stop pretending you’ve thought this through. Your choice.
You haven’t been reading my arguments, have you?
Uh, how would you know that about post-menopausal women? That’s first news to me, I’d better have myself checked. Lubrification still working fine.
One question has been niggling me: your competency test won’t be applicable to infants and toddlers, so why include them on your preference list? Was that 0-10 age group just chosen for shock value?
If you’re a troll, you certainly got what you were seeking.
Yeah, who wants to date a baby? You can’t take them to the movies or anything, and forget about a nice romantic dinner, unless the restaurant can supply a high chair and bib.
There are worthwhile arguments to make. You could argue that society needs to adopt a different term for sex with an underaged person so that those of weaker intellects will stop conflating it with violent predation because it shares the same word. You could argue that the current sentences for sexual contact with factually willing children are overly harsh, both on average (because it is inevitable that some will be falsely convicted) and compared to what other things receive a similar sentence in our overworked justice system.
In fact, I am of those opinions, even though because the percentage of sexual contact between adults and the prepubescent is certainly heavily skewed in favor of being started by the adult, and therefore it follows that many instances where factual coercion occured are currently prosecuted even though there is insufficient evidence for violence, it would seem that from a purely utilitarian perspective, the benefits of harsh sentences and policing might outweigh the increase in freedom for some factually consenting children and adults because the social costs of factual coercion are so high.
True, but what man doesn’t like to feel “big” during sex? And if you’re lacking in God-given size, what choice do you have but to miniaturize your partners?
You know, someone should just send this whole thread (and the other one in GD) to Dan Savage. Maybe he can make sense of it.
Most likely he’d coin a new phrase from it- *Cesario (v): to pretend you have predilections that are even more revolting than your real ones. *
Or really extreme would be -1 to 0.
You’re at a fancy restaurant with a pregant women and the waiter, noticing the pregant women, says, “Your date looks lovely tonight.”
“She’s not my date.”
Cesario, I think you don’t understand that we’re not being all " ewwww kid-adult sex!!!" b/c it’s some sort of conditioned cultural thing.
Basic developemental psychology says that little kids aren’t “developed” EMOITIONALLY to really know about sex and its proper place in realtionships.
You may yap on and on about how your screening tool will prevent that…But the fact of the matter is, is that ANYONE under 13 is far more interested in playing then sex. Even the geniuses or the kids who are “mature” for their ages don’t really have a great hold on what exactly sex is. Heck many teens are still trying to figure all that out you know.
Yes, genitials are hardwired to feel good when you stimulate them.
BUT, the thing is …KIDS are at the developmental stage of discovering what it means to be human. They don’t have the concept of sex as lovemaking…they are at a completely different developmental stage!
Virtually all adults are NOT at that stage. I honestly think you don’t remember what it was like to be a kid. I think almost everyone on the board can look back at when they were a kid or a teen…when they thought they knew EVERYTHING…and you just smile at what an out of it DORK you were back then!
And the reason why I refered to my friend’s experiances as rape is b/c it WAS RAPE! It was rape plain and simple. It was a classic pedophile set up. The jr high gym teacher RAPED (took advantage) of two girls who " consented" They thought they were in a realtionship with him. (and I’m sure HE thought that the realtionship was OK) but both of them are now really fucked up.
You keep on yapping about the difference between child molesters and pedophile, as if they are two completely different things.
Sorry…but there ARE active pedophiles out there!!! I can name TONS of them…the one from “I Know My First Name is Stephen”, the dude who kidnapped and raped Elizabeth Smart, and MANY others!
And yes the FBI stat may be legit…but maybe it simply reflects on how few people really are true pedos…and it does seem that almost all the active ones (as well as the nonactive ones) are batshit insane.
Let me tell you what, your date better not disrupt me with her screaming and crying when I’m out having dinner. If she starts throwing a tantrum, have some courtesy for fellow diners who don’t want to hear toddler screams while they digest their food. Be a responsible date.
combines two hot button issues in one little comment
Yeah! Take her to a chain restaurant where they have crayons for the activities place mats. *Button #3.
And then don’t tip.
Button #4
Regards,
Shodan
Of course, you’ll have to order milk…
I just can’t seem to picture Chucky Cheese by candle-light.
But are refills free? And what if his date wants chocolate milk the next time and isn’t asked before being refilled?
Buttons #5 and #6