Christianity and Love

Hello everyone, my ISP flipped out during the past 24 hours and I couldn’t get online. Just got online and got caught up and now I’ve got to go, but I’ll try to come back later this weekend and respond to some of the comments made.

Briefly … Esprix I’m not ignoring you, but I just don’t want to continue a discussion about a comment that I wish I hadn’t made.

Gaudere…the order of my thinking goes like this:

  1. The Bible is logical
  2. Therefore, if I read something that doesn’t seem logical, I am not understanding something. It has to be logical because it comes from God.

True, this doesn’t work in other areas. I can’t think of anything else that I would start out with an assumption that the source is logical. For example, I don’t start out with the assumption that science is logical because many times it isn’t.

Having said that, I have no problem sometimes looking at the Bible and saying, “God, WHY on earth would you do things THAT way? It makes utterly no sense to me!” But again, I trust God and trust His goodness.

For example, why on earth does He choose to use humans to spread His message when we are so flawed? I genuinely don’t understand and see the logic in this, but good grief, who am I to question God? He’s GOD for petes sake! He knows what He’s doing. If I and God have a disagreement, guess who should win?

That was longer than I planned, I’ve got to run, but like I said I’ll be back to re-read and respond again later.

Gaudere, still wanting to know what you base your logic on … (if you said it earlier and I skimmed it too quickly, forgive me. I’ll reread later)

FriendofGod said:

That’s not logic, that’s belief. Heck, that’s not even “thinking,” it’s belief. You’re basically saying that you believe it because you believe it.

Actually, it doesn’t work in that area.

You are a human being with a brain. If you want to believe that God gave you that brain, fine – why not use it, then? Do you think God would give you a brain and then not want to see it used? What a terrible waste!

You. Because at least we know you exist.

I tend to agree with the 13th Apostle on this one. Paraphrasing “You shouldn’t have beliefs. You should just have an idea

You really believe he said that?

:wink:

No, but I have a pretty good idea.
:wink:

This is faith, not logic. An illogical thing does not become logical just because you have faith that it is, no matter how much you keep insisting that it works that way.

I’m not sure exactly what you’re asking for here, FoG. Do I think that, given true premises and good application of logic, one can discover true things? Yes. Do I think that accepting your particular interpretation of a 2000 year old book as being absolutely perfectly logical even when others point out contradictions in your beliefs is logical? No. It is faith. You wanna have faith, bully for you. But don’t go around insisting that it’s logical and we should accept your word on this instead of thinking for ourselves.

Faith can co-exist with logic. Polycarp believes in a God who loves all His children and would not punish them for things they cannot help. This is his faith. Because of this faith, he can use his logic to state that His God would not punish someone for being homosexual. See how this works? What you do is state your faith that God must punish all humans fairly. This is faith. Then you state that God does not, in fact, punish all humans fairly. This is illogical, and it is statements like this that make others reject your beliefs. If someone stated something you believed to be illogical you would feel perfectly justified in not believing it. For example, if someone stated that their God loved everyone, no matter what, and then later stated that their God did not love everyone, wouldn’t you refuse to accept that their God made any sense? Would you allow them to say “it makes perfect sense, I can’t tell you how, but I know it does and you should accept this”? Yet when the same scrutiny is turned on your statements, you say “I don’t understand it, but I know it’s logical,” and expect us to agree.

Gaudere and others, I think I finally have a good capsule sentence that explains something I believe. I can’t take credit for it. A friend of mine mentioned at a Birthday party last night that he had heard an excellent teaching the week before. In this teaching the following line was said:

“Faith REQUIRES unanswered questions.”

As soon as I heard it, I knew that it said better than I could something that I’ve not explained well, if at all. Actually, Guadere, I somewhat AGREE with parts of your last post! (Are you stunned?) Let me quote you:

You said:
“This is faith, not logic. An illogical thing does not become logical just because you have faith that it is, no matter how much you keep insisting that it works that way.”

Agreed, PARTLY at least. I have never said that an illogical thing becomes logical just because I have faith that it is. What I have said, and would continue to say, is that God Himself is always logical. He CREATED logic.

So if GOD says something, it’s logical. If I don’t understand the logic of it, I accept it on faith because it comes from God. Your statement starts out by assuming that the “thing” is illogical because you’ve judged it to be so. I say that if God said it, it must be logical, and I just don’t understand His logic yet. And yes, that’s faith. As my friend’s statement says: “Faith REQUIRES unanswered questions.” That’s why I’m concerned for you … you seem to want all questions answered (correct me if I’m wrong).
David B, similarly, said:
“That’s not logic, that’s belief.”
TRUE! But what you’re missing is what my belief is. I BELIEVE that God is always logical and makes sense and knows what He’s doing.

You also said: “You’re basically saying that you believe it because you believe it.” No, I’m saying I believe it because God said it and He’s trustworthy. I do have faith in Him.
David also said: “You are a human being with a brain. If you want to believe that God gave you that brain, fine – why not use it, then? Do you think God would give you a brain and then not want to see it used? What a terrible waste!”
I’m not totally sure how my quote prompted your statements here, but I think you’re saying that I would never try to figure out God’s logic. Not true! As I stated earlier in this thread (about 30 pages ago), there are MANY questions I’ve asked God and the Bible that I have wrestled through to satisfactory answers. There have been MANY “a-HA” moments when it finally hit me WHY God did certain things and what He was getting at.

My original quote you responded to was: “I genuinely don’t understand and see the logic in this, but good grief, who am I to question God?”
So David, are you saying you think I should question God’s genuineness just because I can’t INSTANTLY understand something? You can walk a fine line asking God questions. If you ask with the attitude “I HAVE to know NOW or I’m not going to trust you anymore!”, I can pretty much guarantee that you won’t find any answers from God. If, however, you say “I don’t know NOW, but I TRUST you God even though I don’t understand. I’d LIKE to understand. SHOW me. TEACH me. If it takes 30 YEARS or the REST OF MY LIFE, I’ll be patient” … THAT’s a healthy attitude.
Finally, I said: “If I and God have a disagreement, guess who should win?” You said: “You. Because at least we know you exist.”
David … you CAN’T be serious. Please tell me you’re just funning me. PLEASE! I am blown away that anyone would sincerely answer that way. I’m sorry if this sounds too sarcastic, but I am semi-speechless.

I will say again, I believe God exists because He’s lived in my soul since I was 8 years old. Plus, just common sense and observing the way the earth and universe work, the way my body works, etc. That’s a whole 'nother topic.

Gaudere I didn’t forget your last comment. Here’s what I’m getting at. I believe what I believe based on the foundation of the Bible. What is the foundation on which you believe what you believe? You said: “Do I think that, given true premises and good application of logic, one can discover true things? Yes.” So where do these true premises and good applications of logic come from? Who is it that says they are true and good? How can you be sure?
Now … and I may regret it, but I’ll comment on a FEW of the “specifics”. I’m starting to not want to do that more and more because it doesn’t seem to be accomplishing anything … but I think I’ll try one more time.

You said: “What you do is state your faith that God must punish all humans fairly. This is faith. Then you state that God does not, in fact, punish all humans fairly. This is illogical”
First off … just in general, if I do a bad job of explaining something from the Bible, and make it sound illogical, that’s a reflection of ME, not the Bible. If indeed I had said what you quoted, that’s a reflection of my (perhaps) poor skills in arguing a point.

I clarified this point in a recent post. God is just and so He must punish sin. (not “must punish all humans fairly”). God’s mercy allowed Jesus to take the punishment for us, which we don’t deserve.

You say it isn’t logical. I say that you and I don’t SEE the logic because we aren’t God. His ability to implement logic is on a dramatically higher plane than yours or mine.

Let me put it this way. I’m sure you’ve heard of the whole Trinity thing. Perfect example. God is ONE being. Yet He is, at the SAME TIME, Three distinct personalities - God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit. I gave the “water as water, steam, and ice” example a few posts back, but even that is a poor illustration. I’ve never known a single Christian that could fully explain the Trinity to anyone’s satisfaction, and I doubt I ever will.

So what do you do with this concept Gaudere? Do you place your own beliefs about what is logical ahead of God’s and say “THAT just ISN’T logical, so GOD isn’t logical, so I’m NOT gonna believe in Him or follow Him!” Now I haven’t heard your comments on the Trinity, but if you do in fact find it illogical and leave that belief as your final statement on the matter … I must say truthfully that you are depending on faith too. You have faith that your logic is correct. What if you are wrong?

Finally, you said:
"For example, if someone stated that their God loved everyone, no matter what, and then later stated that their God did not love everyone, wouldn’t you refuse to accept that their God made any sense? Would you allow them to say “it makes perfect sense, I can’t tell you how, but I know it does and you should accept this”? "

Let me give you a real-life story to somewhat answer your question. In 1995, while riding a bus into downtown Atlanta for work, I met a woman named Fay and we became friends. Over time, just through honestly answering her questions about “how I was doing” and what was going on in my life, she came to realize I was a Christian and began asking me questions about it.

We went through an interesting 9 month dialogue. She asked very challenging questions, and to be honest in HER case I was able to answer most of them to her satisfaction from the Bible. I did it in bits and pieces during bus rides for 9 months.

However, there were some questions I just couldn’t answer. For example, she thought it was unfair that God would allow someone into heaven on their deathbed if they got saved, but not let someone into heaven that had been a “good person” their whole life. Again, I kept pointing out the principle I’d given her that there isn’t such a thing as a good person, and she said she understood it but didn’t want to accept it because it didn’t seem fair, etc etc etc.

Well guess what? I never answered her question. After 9 months, she came to Christ anyway. Why, you ask? Because it’s not my job to fully convince someone to come to Christ. It’s not my job to fully answer each question. It’s my job to answer every question I can, and, as they say, “let God do the rest”.

GOD is the ultimate one who has to convince you Guadere. The real, actual, living, breathing God who you say you don’t believe in. I can’t do that. That’s what God did with my friend Fay. As I prayed for her, GOD moved in her heart and life and began to show Himself to her.

The key for HER though was … she was OPEN to God. She was WILLING for God to show Himself to her. God is a gentleman, and He won’t force Himself on anyone.

I will confess that part of the problem here … and I’m embarrassed to admit it … is I’ve not been praying. My prayer life as a whole isn’t where it should be anyway, but I’m not praying that God will show Himself to you like I should. But I’ll tell you this … I promise to you that I will right after I hit the Submit button, because I truly believe He wants to show Himself to you, in some way. I just pray that you are truly open.

So no, I don’t expect you to accept this just because I say it and it doesnt all make sense to you. God has to do His part too. And I’m going to pray right now that He will.

Have a good night! :slight_smile:

God is logical because he created logic? That’s cheating.

Also don’t look now but your circular logic is showing.

2 qu’s avalon …

  1. Where’s the circle?
  2. Why am I not in bed at 2:15 am?

PS, I realized while re-zipping through the post that there were some earlier comments I never responded to. I’ll try to get to them tomorrow night.

FriendofGod said:

You know what? I don’t think you will ever understand what we are saying. You automatically assume that everything about your belief is logical. Why? Because it must be that way according to your belief system. There is no way for actual logic (as opposed to what you appear to think is logic) to make a dent in this because you have your God shield up and nothing can penetrate it. We’ve tried the phasers of logic and the photon torpedoes of rationality, but your God shield is stronger. Your mind is completely closed off to any other possibility.

Fine. That’s your belief. But the problem is that you use that belief as a shield (as noted above) whenever anybody points out flaws in the logic. Why do the good go to hell? Because God says so. And God is logical. Therefore the person asking the question must not understand. But, to the contrary, the people asking questions like this do understand. We understand that blind belief without any logic will get you nowhere. You won’t find converts here with that attitude. All you will find are questions that you can’t answer.

Trustworthy? Yeah, you can trust him to be a petty dictator and to eternally torture those who don’t bow down to him. What a guy!

No, I’m saying you should question your belief system because it makes no sense to worship a petty dictator who you trust even though you admit that some things he does make no sense whatsoever.

Yes I can.

No.

I realize that it blows you away to find out that there are those who don’t believe in your petty dictator god, but we’re out here.

We should be so lucky…

Indeed it is. And I’m sure that your version of common sense – if it’s anything like your version of logic – will be nothing like actual common sense.

FriendofGod:

Lets do a thought experiment. What would have to be demonstrated to you that would prove the bible is just a book of ancient fables or that God does not exist? Think of any proof you need in theory only, that would make you seriously question your religious beliefs.

Okay David, let me comment on a few of your comments.

You said: “You know what? I don’t think you will ever understand what we are saying. You automatically assume that everything about your belief is logical. Why? Because it must be that way according to your belief system.”

I understand completely. I simply read what you’re saying, understand it, and realize that you are sincere but very, very misguided people! I will say this however, I don’t think YOU are understanding me. You’ve misquoted me again in this quote and in several of the following quotes.

Here is, I think, the ROOT of the confict you and I (and Guadere) are having here. I am choosing to state that there are absolute truths in the universe that are above your and my opinion. You come back and try to turn what I say into “my personal opinion” or “my belief system”.

For example, in the quote above you said “you automatically assume that everything about your belief is logical.” Wrong. I assume that the God who created the universe is logical. Not “my belief system” in Him (whatever the heck that is), HIM! He, Himself! Do you understand? Whether I believe it or not is totally irrelevant! There are absolute truths in the universe that are there whether we believe them or not.

And yes I understand that you want evidence of that before you can believe it for yourself. I understand that you are incredulous that I can’t seem to bring myself to believe that I might possibly be wrong. Well, there are dozens, yea, hundreds of issues that I don’t have answers for, of where I think I’m right but might be wrong. This isn’t one of them. There are actually not many things I would be this strong on, but salvation is one of the very, very few.

As I said earlier, it’s as certain to me as the law of gravity. If I argued against the law of gravity, would you say “Well this is just my OPINION, but the law of gravity is true”? No, you would state it as fact.

As I said to Guadere, I can’t convince you fully. All I can do is present the truths of the Gospel as best as I’m able, pray, hope that you folks are open to God, and trust God to do the rest. David there are probably people who could do it better than me, and explain more of the questions you guys have than I can. I can only explain what I’ve already learned, not things I don’t know yet.
You said: "your God shield up and nothing can penetrate it. "
Thankfully, you’re right! :slight_smile:

"We’ve tried the phasers of logic and the photon torpedoes of rationality, but your God shield is stronger. "
No. You’ve tried the phasers of what YOU BELIEVE is logical and the torpedoes of what YOU BELIEVE to be rational. I’ll ask you the same question I’m asking Guadere. I am placing my trust in the God of the universe and His Word, the Bible. What are you placing your trust in? I’ve told you why I’m so certain that what I believe is the truth. Why are YOU so certain? How can YOU be sure you are correct?
Your next quote: "But the problem is that you use that belief as a shield (as noted above) whenever anybody points out flaws in the logic. Why do the good go to hell? Because God says so. And God is logical. "
Again, you PERCEIVE there to be flaws in the logic. Just because I’m not as skilled a debator as some of you doesn’t mean that what God says isn’t logical.
Also, David, you’ve misquoted me again. Forgive me for being so blunt here, but do you do this intentionally or did you really just forget what I’ve said over and over throughout this thread? “Why do the good go to hell?” Well they don’t. But the only good person that ever existed was Jesus Christ. There is no such thing as a good person. We are all guilty.

I’m not saying we can’t understand ANY of God’s logic. I’ve explained some of it as best as I can. Actually there’s quite a bit we CAN understand. For example, the “good person” issue. If you add up all the angry thoughts, lustful desires, jealous feelings, etc etc that people have in a lifetime, it shatters the myth that people are “basically good” and deserve to go to heaven. Again, once some of these posts die down I’d like to do a whole topic on this one single point.
You said again: “Trustworthy? Yeah, you can trust him to be a petty dictator and to eternally torture those who don’t bow down to him. What a guy!”
See my comments to you on the ‘Why the Christian God’ thread. (Either that one or the one about those who are sincerely open to God, can’t recall which).
To summarize, however, you are making God out to be the bad guy when in fact He is the perfect, loving one and it is US who are the “bad guy”. We practically BEG to be tortured eternally by the way we treat God.
Next quote: “No, I’m saying you should question your belief system because it makes no sense to worship a petty dictator who you trust even though you admit that some things he does make no sense whatsoever.”

Sigh David, I ask again, do you misquote me deliberately? I have NEVER said that some of the things God says make no sense whatsoever, nor would I. How ridiculous! I’ve said that I personally don’t understand some of the things God says.

If you hang around Christians long enough, you’ll hear us sometimes say things like, “Can you BELIEVE God chooses to use us? Why? Who are we?” and “I wonder WHY God did such-and-so in my life? Why did He put me in such-and-so position at work? I sure wouldn’t have done it that way!”

But because we know God’s character, we trust Him. We aren’t “throwing our minds away” as you seem to think, we are doing the thing that makes the most sense - trusting in the loving, giving, Holy, and pure Creator of the universe. We trust the He knows how to run our lives better than we do.

AND HE DOES! You know, perhaps I’ve been coming at this the wrong way. Maybe you need to hear testimonies of how God has worked in my life and other’s lives. That’s the best “evidence” of all!

David (AND Gaudere), one last thing. I’d encourage you to read Job 38 - 42. It is a passage in the Bible in which God directly answers skeptics such as yourselves. It’s fascinating reading … one of the most gripping passages in all the Bible!

Okay, now for Icerigger (hi, by the way I don’t believe we’ve met :)). You said: "Lets do a thought experiment. What would have to be demonstrated to you that would prove the bible is just a book of ancient fables or that God does not exist? Think of any proof you need in theory only, that would make you seriously question your religious beliefs. "

Well well well, what an intriguing challenge! Here are a few things that come to mind that would have to be proven:

  1. That God does not live in my soul and has not guided me through my life for the past almost-30 years. Sorry, but that one’s impossible to prove cuz I’ve lived it. I know He lives in me, BELIEVE it! There’s been times when I didn’t want to hear what He had to say!
  2. That the Bible doesn’t have supernatural power to change my life for the better. This would be impossible to prove as well. I’ve experienced it’s supernatural power in my life hundreds of times, and I’ve seen it in others’ lives.

Those are the two biggest things you’d have to prove that I can think of. There are probably more but knock yourself out with those two!

FriendofPettyDictator said:

I’m sorry, but until I see evidence to the contrary, I will not accept that you understand anything that any of us have been saying here.

That probably is the root of the problem, or should I say, the root of your problem – that you “think” your belief system represents an absolute truth, and cannot fathom otherwise.

Yes, I understand that, in your mind, you cannot separate the two. The rest of us, however, can. So don’t blame us for your inability to keep the two separate.

You’re right. One of them is that there absolutely is or absolutely is not a God (or more than one Gods). But neither of us know the answer to that question. Oh, sure, you believe you know the answer, but that’s all it is – a belief. But you can’t seem to understand that. :frowning:

Yes, it’s as certain to you. That’s what makes it a belief. The law of gravity can be tested objectively. Your God belief cannot.

Yes, I would. Because it’s been tested, over and over again. If you argued against it, I would just invite you to take a walk off the top of the Sears Tower to prove me wrong.

You can’t even convince me a little bit – because you don’t use rational thinking, evidence, or logic. All of those things are necessary to convince me.

ROFL! You refuse to acknowledge that your own belief is, indeed, a belief, but when it comes to actual logic and rationality, you say those are just beliefs. Man, what color is the sky in your world? You’ve got everything upside down and backwards. I have to wonder how you can function in the real world…

Reality. You might try it sometime. Who knows, you might even like it!

Who ever said I was? I do not proclaim that there is definitely, 100% certain, no god. But if there is a god, it is untestable by human means. Thus, it takes faith to believe. I do not have such faith. I see no need for a god. Maybe there is one. Who knows? But if there is one, and it’s the petty dictator tyrant you have described, I want no part of him anyway. If there is a god, I would hope it is a god that admires humans who use the brains he gave us.

Give me a break. I don’t just perceive there to be flaws, there are flaws. Big gaping ones. You just refuse to see them because they would challenge your entire belief system. You are blinded by God.

I did not misquote you – for one, I never said I was quoting you, so it would be hard to misquote you. For another, that was a good summary of the views you have expressed.

Again, give me a break.

No, just the stuff that is obviously illogical. If it’s illogical, then it must be logical but we just can’t understand it.

It only shatters it to you because that is your belief system. Rational people realize that what you’re saying it simply ridiculous.

Oh jeez, what BS. (I’d use stronger language, but this isn’t the Pit.) Nobody begs to be tortured – your God just does it for the fun of it, apparently. Your claim that he is loving is shown to be false by the fact that he throws people into eternal torment. That is hateful, not loving.

You may not call it throwing your mind away, but I sure do. You are putting your trust in your belief that everything is the way it should be, and you don’t bother to seriously question why things really are the way they are. Your mind is just taking up space. You might as well get rid of it and lose a few worthless pounds.

Oh, yeah. That’s exactly what I need. :rolleyes: 'Cus I’ve never heard those stories before.

Sorry, FoG, but that isn’t evidence – that just shows that some people need religion as a crutch.

Mmmmm. I’ll get right on that.

FoG, you seem to be confused about logic when you state that there is “God’s logic” and “our logic”. They are one and the same; logic is logic. Not even God can make a rock so big He can’t lift it; it is logically impossible. God may have access to more information that we do, but that does not make an illogical thing logical. No matter how powerful God is, or how much He knows, He cannot make a rock so big He can’t lift it. Not even God can be logically considered “just” if he punishes the innocent for the crimes of the guilty.

If you admit that God can have attributes that seem illogical, what defense do you have against those who would corrupt your beliefs? I know you remembered that I asked:

…since you quoted it in your response. Yet you did not answer my question. If you can believe in a God that has illogical and contradictory attributes and expect others to do the same, what prevents you from accepting beliefs that are contradictory to what you already believe? How can you deny them without accepting that logic is a useful way to determine what is true and what isn’t?

If you are positing a God who is not bound by logic, one who can do anything even if it’s logically impossible, you’re getting into some very dangerous territory. I have some good arguments regarding a God not bound by logic, and I don’t think you want to go there. :wink:

Premises are true if they are in fact true. We assume they are true for the purposes of applying logic, but if a contradiction is revealed, one or both is shown to be false. It’s easy; say I had only ever seen green apples, and I thought all apples were green. Someone hands me an apple, and asks me (without me looking) what color it is:

My Premise (assumed to be true): All apples are green
I have an apple.
Therefore, the apple I have is green.

Now, say I look at the apple, and it is red. This contradicts my premise, so my premise is not true. So we have two things that were assumed to be facts (that all apples are green, and that I have a red apple), but they contradicted each other so one had to be false (it is also possible that the apple in my hand was not an apple, or not really red, but let’s say we can confirm that it is in fact an apple, and it is really red.). Do you think I am using logic well here? Do you think that by my use of logic I discovered a contradiction in my beliefs, and therefore was able to prove untrue a belief that I had once thought true?

Now, let’s look at your claims:
God is perfectly just (accepted definition of “just”: one who judges fairly and morally correctly, punishing those who deserve it)
God is perfectly merciful (accepted definition of merciful (your definition, in fact): one who does not punish those who deserve it)

These conflict. One or both assertions are therefore somehow false. Maybe God really does punish those who deserve it; maybe God is not perfectly just; something like that. I think the definition I give of “just” is correct, and I am using your definition of merciful, so you can hardly quibble about that. Now, let’s look at your attempt to reconcile this:

I believe you are redefining “just” in a manner that is widely at variance with the accepted definition. We do not consider a person “just” who, when you hit them, goes and hits another person. “Just” means punishing those who deserve it, not the undeserving. “Punish”, itself, (as the result of justice) means imposing a penalty for an offense on the person who offended. Imposing a penalty on a person who did no offense is not punishment, it is simply injustice. I submit that you need a new word, since “just”–as the vast majority of people use the word–does not describe your God’s actions. You wouldn’t want to confuse them by calling God “just” and everyone thinks it means that He fairly punishes the deserving and does not punish the innocent, would you? I think you should use “glurft” instead. You can say “my God is perfectly gluft!” and we will say, “what is glurft?” and you say “a being is glurft when s/he must hurt someone when anyone sins. However, the being can punish those who did not sin, and then does not have to hurt those who did sin! My God does this, therefore He is glurft.” And we would all nod and say, “Why, He is glurft!” :smiley:

I don’t consider anyone a gentleman who will let me suffer horribly for eternity because I didn’t think he existed.

Gaudere, LOL, glurft.
That’s a good one. I think I’m gonna write that down.

Obviously we’re going round and round here David, getting nowhere. Let’s just acknowledge that there are two immovable views here and move on -

  1. I believe that it is an absolute truth that God is Good and the Bible is true.
  2. You believe that the things you perceive as illogical in the Bible prove that the above statement is untrue.
    Now, you said “The law of gravity can be tested objectively. Your God belief cannot.”
    Ah, but it can be tested. Go to a healthy, Bible-believing church for 2 - 3 months and watch the lives of the strong Christians in the church. You will see Godly attitudes that are not “human”. They are super-human, or should I say superNATURAL. Consistant Godliness is something that can only come through Jesus Christ. And no, obviously I don’t mean perfection, just a hunger and passion for God that leads to a Godly life, and a willingness to acknowledge and repent of sin when it happens.

If YOUR theory of God is correct, healthy born again Christians should be the most miserable people in the world, trying to bear up under this awful dictator. So check it out! See if that’s what you find.

Now, you quoted me as saying “You’ve tried the phasers of what YOU BELIEVE is logical and the torpedoes of what YOU BELIEVE to be rational.” You responded: “ROFL! You refuse to acknowledge that your own belief is, indeed, a belief, but when it comes to actual logic and rationality, you say those are just beliefs. Man, what color is the sky in your world? You’ve got everything upside down and backwards. I have to wonder how you can function in the real world…”

You didn’t answer the question.
You then quoted me as saying “I’ll ask you the same question I’m asking Guadere. I am placing my trust in the God of the universe and His Word, the Bible. What are you placing your trust in?”. You responded: “Reality. You might try it sometime. Who knows, you might even like it!”

And just who defines what reality is, David? You? I’m not being funny here, I just want to know what you base your belief in.

You quoted me again: “I’ve told you why I’m so certain that what I believe is the truth. Why are YOU so certain? How can YOU be sure you are correct?” Your response: "Who ever said I was? I do not proclaim that there is definitely, 100% certain, no god. But if there is a god, it is untestable by human means. Thus, it takes faith to believe. I do not have such faith. I see no need for a god. Maybe there is one. Who knows? But if there is one, and it’s the petty dictator tyrant you have described, I want no part of him anyway. If there is a god, I would hope it is a god that admires humans who use the brains he gave us. "

So if I understand correctly, you are acknowledging the possibility that God exists. Can you also acknowledge that your image of God might be slightly, ah, skewed a little?
Once again you quote me: “Again, you PERCEIVE there to be flaws in the logic. Just because I’m not as skilled a debator as some of you doesn’t mean that what God says isn’t logical.” And you respond: “Give me a break. I don’t just perceive there to be flaws, there are flaws. Big gaping ones. You just refuse to see them because they would challenge your entire belief system. You are blinded by God.”

David, when I made “absolute truth” statements I said it was based on the Bible. You are now making an “absolute truth” statement yourself (“I don’t just perceive there to be flaws, there are flaws”). Again I ask … based on what? You said “reality” as a sort-of answer. But you basically don’t believe in God, yet acknowledge that it’s possibile that you are wrong. If if it turns out you are wrong and God does indeed exist, is it not possible that other aspects of life that you consider to be “reality” are also false?

Later you said: “I did not misquote you – for one, I never said I was quoting you, so it would be hard to misquote you. For another, that was a good summary of the views you have expressed.”

Sorry, but saying “Why do the good go to hell? Because God says so. And God is logical.” is not a good summary of the views I’ve expressed, as I pointed out. It’s flat out inaccurate.
You quoted me: ““Why do the good go to hell?” Well they don’t. But the only good person that ever existed was Jesus Christ. There is no such thing as a good person. We are all guilty.” Your response: "Again, give me a break. "

And later you said in response to my specifics about why we’re not good people: "It only shatters it to you because that is your belief system. Rational people realize that what you’re saying it simply ridiculous. "

Why? What has you so convinved that this isn’t true? You say it’s simply ridiculous. Well lay it on me Dave, tell me why!

You quoted me as saying: "I’m not saying we can’t understand ANY of God’s logic. " and you responded, "No, just the stuff that is obviously illogical. "

Well Dave you seem pretty confident that the things you perceive to be illogical are, in fact, illogical. Once again, based on what? In other words, “obviously” to whom?

I said: “We practically BEG to be tortured eternally by the way we treat God.”
you responded: "Nobody begs to be tortured – your God just does it for the fun of it, apparently. Your claim that he is loving is shown to be false by the fact that he throws people into eternal torment. That is hateful, not loving. "

David, is it hateful if we capture a mass murderer and he/she is punished for his/her crime? Or is it justice? Let’s water it down … if someone is caught shoplifting and he/she is punished, does the judge hate the person who did it or are they just doing what they have to do?

You said “your God just does it for the fun of it”. I certainly can’t let your slanderous statement just sit there. Again I’ll let the Bible speak for itself: “The Lord is not slow in keeping His promise as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.” (2 Pet 3:9)

You said nobody begs to be tortured. Oh, really? Watched the news lately? This world is full of people who curse God, test God, rail against God, and deliberately violate His truth just to throw it in His face. I call that practically begging God to throw them in the pit. Yeah, it’s not rational, but the world isn’t rational. Only God is.
Finally, you quoted me: “We aren’t “throwing our minds away” as you seem to think, we are doing the thing that makes the most sense - trusting in the loving, giving, Holy, and pure Creator of the universe.”
You responded: “You may not call it throwing your mind away, but I sure do. You are putting your trust in your belief that everything is the way it should be, and you don’t bother to seriously question why things really are the way they are.”

Again, pardon me for re-reading my own quote, but WHERE did I say that? I am not at all putting my trust in a belief that everything is the way it should be, because it’s NOT! I trust God that He is smart enough to run my life. Things are NOT the way they “should be” all the time … usually because I start doing things “my way” momentarily!

As for not seriously questioning things … once again, I’ve stated on this post and others that I’ve seriously questioned many things and still do. It’s one of the most enjoyable parts of Christianity … asking God honest questions, and patiently studying and listening for years until you find an answer! I’ve learned many truths of God this way and I’m sure I’ll learn many more.
Again, I’ve said this before David. Do you deliberately leave it out, or are you sincerely just forgetting what I’ve said before?

whew I think I’ve covered what you said. Hope you consider it and take it to heart.

FriendofGod, I’m going to make this as simple as possible.
Something is not logical because someone, even God, says it is-it is logical because the a logical process can be pointed out for all to see. If the logical process cannot be explained, then the process itself is NOT logical.

To say that something or someone is logical, but that we are not supposed to understand it or him, shows that you do not have a rudimentary knowledge of what “logic” is.

FofG, I think most of the Christian religions are illogical for a simple reason.
You say one MUST accept Jesus Christ to get into heaven. That’s true, but for different reasons. Jesus Christ came and used his life to pay for our sins. Sins we cannot have if we wish to be in God’s presence. Now, we reason, that since we all sin, we all must accept Jesus Christ to get to heaven. You take away the middle part. It should be Jesus Christ=no sins=heaven, NOT Jesus Christ=heaven.
So, NOT accepting JC should not be the reason to be cast down in hell for eternity. The sins should be. But everybody should have ample oppurtunity to pay for those sins themselves. JC does not equal heaven. The absense of sins equals heaven.
God offered us all the oppurtunity to have JC pay for our sins. But, in order to be fair, all men should have the oppurtunity to pay for their own sins.
For example, I lend you 10,000 dollars. (That’s your life, complete with sins) And I want my money soon. I’m worse than any loan shark. I give you two choices. Either you take another loan from the bank I own and pay me back with little interest. That way, you still owe 10,000, but you owe it to the bank, and you can have more time to pay it back. That’s becoming a Christian. OR you can pay it back with no outside assistance. Because it takes longer, I charge higher interest, but I don’t force you to go through my bank. That’s spending a lil bit of time in “Hotel Hell” and paying for your own sins.
To me that makes more sense that forcing you to go through my bank in order to pay back the loan you incurred, and you should be responsible for, and if you don’t go through my bank, I take out all my wrath on you forever.

Or that could just be me.

FriendofPettyMurderousTyrant said:

Indeed. That could change, if you were ever willing to open your eyes and ears (not to mention your mind), but I don’t see any indication of that happening any time soon.

Baloney. You don’t even understand what proper testing is, do you? “Attitudes” don’t prove your god exists. Gravity is testable. God is not. Why can’t you get this through your head?

You whined that I was “misquoting” you (even though I wasn’t) and you have the nerve to attribute this BS to me? I never said anything about Christians being miserable, etc. Like I said, some of you use God as a crutch. Indeed, I suspect that belief in God helps those of you who can’t bear to think for yourselves. But it doesn’t prove anything.

What question? I pointed out that your worldview is completely backwards. And it is. So what question would you like me to address?

And just who defines what reality is, David? You? I’m not being funny here, I just want to know what you base your belief in.
[/quote]
It’s sad that you don’t even understand the concept of objective reality and rationality. Nobody defines reality. We can observe it and study it, though – that is, if we aren’t blinded by a belief in a supposed supernatural entity.

Sure. And I also acknowledge the possibility that there might be a one-eyed, one-horned, flying purple people eater living inside of Pluto. But you don’t see me praying to it for salvation.

Any omnipotent being worth his salt could hide his presence. So there is no way for me to rationally say, “There is definitely no god.” But if there is no evidence that he exists, why should I bother with him?

No, because that’s not my image of God. That’s your image of God. I’m just holding up a mirror to show you what He looks like.

Yes, I am. As several people have tried to explain to you already, logic is not an area where there are different beliefs and perceptions. Logic works by certain rules. Your “logic” just doesn’t work, because it isn’t actually logic. It’s belief pretending to be logic, and not doing a very good job of it.

Man, you just don’t get it, do you? Sure, there could be a whole mess of spirits and ghosts and goblins running around, completely untestable and not interacting at all with mankind. But again, that has nothing to do with the reality we are dealing with. If it is untestable and doesn’t interact, then it might as well not exist. If it does exist, then it doesn’t affect reality.

No, it’s perfectly accurate – you just choose to redefine terms. Just because you don’t think people can ever be good doesn’t make your view correct.

To anybody who understands logic, that’s who. Again, people have tried to explain this to you and have been met with a wall of ignorance because of your God shield. In fact, I suspect they’d have better luck talking to a wall…

So you equate failing to bow down to your god in exactly the right way with mass murder? I’m seriously beginning to question your sanity…

Jesus Fucking Christ, you still have no idea what we’ve all been talking about, do you?

We’re talking about people whose only “crime” is to not bow down to your petty fucking tyrant in the right way. They have not committed a crime. They have not done anybody any harm. They are punished merely for failing to become mindless sheep.

My statement stands. He is supposedly omniscient and omnipotent, yet he tortures people for the hell of it. Your version of god is a cruel tyrant who loves only himself and wants everybody else to bow down to him – or else they will suffer forever. He makes Hitler look like a nice guy.

So I’m begging to be tortured? No. I’m pointing out the flaws in your belief system. If your god is so petty that he can’t handle that, then fuck him.

Got a phone call – I’ll finish later.

I too can testify to the power of attending Church. The following account boggled my mind.

There simply is no response to this:

http://victorious.com/SisterWOOD/letters/jiffy.htm
Thanks go to Cruel Site of the day