I think it has a lot to do with the way a comment is framed. as much as the content, for example, if some newb pulled up a lawn chair in the pit and you said:
“Hey, just a friendly piece of advice, TPTB don’t like it when we do that” - I reckon it would probably not be seen as junior modding, whereas if you’d said:
“pulling up a lawn chair is not permitted in the pit. Don’t do that” - I think it probably would.
My point being, who knows what goes on now that **Ed **is enforcing all sorts of New Rules That Will Be Coming Down LIke a Shithammer But Which We Can’t Articulate Yet. (You’ll Know Them When We Ban You.)
Or when the new rules are replaced by the new, NEW rules (all unwritten and previously unknown) because Ed’s dog dies or something and he wants to take it out here…
That’s not entirely fair; there were a lot of extenuating circumstances in Ed’s recent precipitous actions, and I don’t think the posters involved in it (the complainers and the people who just had to cross the line) were lily-white and innocent, either.
But the rules up to that point clearly stated that you could use the “About this Message Board” topic to complain about the board, the mods, or the administration. In fact, it still reads that way.
Those were Ed’s rules, posters availed themselves of that option, and Ed comes on here and delivers the Sermon From On High telling us children that he has had enough and that if we keep it up, we won’t get our milk and cookies for snack time.
Then Otto asks a very reasonable question and gets banned for it. Several hours later when Ed’s testosterone level drops back to normal, he commutes Otto’s banning to a weekend suspension.
What he owed Otto, and every poster here, is an apology. What did Otto do to deserve a weekend suspension?