Clothahump, and others...

The only weak sauce here is the chromosome deficient spooge your dad contributed to your construction.

One does know, one does. Clothahump is nothing if not perfectly predictable.

Arguing with Clothahump is like trying to argue with a parrot. The only reasonable course is ridicule.

Or putting a blanket over his cage.

To be fair, he’s also been hit in the head with sticks.

No love for GW Bush? I mean if you’re giving all this credit to Obama for nearly doubling it, you have to pay some respect to W for more than doubling it during his 8 years.

Ahhh, the email thing again. I still don’t understand why we don’t hear more about Right doing something eerily similar (and losing 22 million emails in the process).

and banned Christmas

Dey terk er jerbs

and then opened up the FEMA death camps

**Who slashed the funding for embassy security? **

For fiscal 2013, the GOP-controlled House proposed spending $1.934 billion for the State Department’s Worldwide Security Protection program – well below the $2.15 billion requested by the Obama administration. House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012. (Negotiations with the Democrat-controlled Senate restored about $88 million of the administration’s request.) Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” – a charge Republicans rejected.

Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.

Now 6-6 in the 9th… :eek:

Fat lady went and got another hot dog. Too bad beer sales are suspended in the 7th.

I blame Obama.

Now THAT’S a disaster!

Thanks, Obama :mad:

Or, the preferred (and cheapest) solution: just die.

No, that’d be 6-6 in the 6th…

Conservatives didn’t give a flying fuck about the ballooning debt from 1981 to 1993, then it was a serious problem from 1993 to 2001, then they didn’t give a fuck again until 2009, and from then to now it’s been a crisis. It’s quite puzzling, really.

That’s why conservatives think Trump will fix the debt problem. He won’t lower it, of course, but no matter how much it goes up they can go back to not giving a flying fuck about it.

Yep. Anybody who votes for a Republican for president on the grounds that they’ll be fiscally responsible has had his head in the sand for 35 years.

Or they’re just fucking stupid. The subject of this pitting is a fine example. Too stupid to know basic facts. Too stupid to learn. Deliberately ignorant.

Clothahump is wronger’n wrong.

Hillary’s presidency won’t, in fact, be “the same disastrous bullshit” - it’ll be worse. The woman is even more of a corrupt elitist than Obama is. Privileged “progressives”–who come from all colors, btw - this ain’t a race-based privilege I’m talking about, it’s a matter of socioeconomic class–love to run their mouths during and about post-Carter Democrat presidencies about how things are improving and moving up/did improve and move up. Up! Up! Up!

Meanwhile, those of us without said privilege have gotten, are getting, and will continue to get lip service while we get hosed down by the establishment (in many cases, literally).

I don’t know if you’re aware of this, but you’re kinda dumb.