Without a doubt, Obama has been absolutely terrible at maintaining Pax Americana (“Red line? What red line?” is probably going to go down as the moment when NATO lost the Syrian War to the Russians, and let’s not mention that Libya has devolved into George Miller’s Wasteland.) But to many (most?) Americans that’s a feature, not a bug.
You’re not concerned about her stupidity/arrogance in doing this in the first place? You’re not concerned about the fact that she did it deliberately to avoid FOIA requests?
Apparently not. I am. I don’t want someone like that as POTUS. Trump wasn’t my first choice, nor my second or even third. But I would vote for a one-legged leper to keep Hillary out of the White House.
You go ahead and vote however you want, because he isn’t going to win.
Did you read the definition? Do you not understand the concept that one does not have to be tried and convicted to be referred to as a felon. They simply have to have committed a felony. Same as a bigamist, who commits bigamy. Same as a burglar, who commits burglary. Same as a robber, who commits robbery. Etc., etc. Deal with it.
For starters, 55% of Americans are glad we’ve had President Obama.
Perhaps because unemployment has fallen from 7.2% under Bush to 4.9% now. Or maybe because the S&P 500 has gone from 850.12 up to 2,111.72. (It fell from 1,342.52 (Clinton I) to that 850 number under Bush.)
Price of gas is down from 8 years ago. (Average price in 2008 was $3.24, it’s now about a buck under that.)
23 million more Americans now have health insurance
Iran has shipped off tons of processed uranium and closed two thirds of its centrifuges.
100,000 US troops have come home.
The US has “suffered” the longest period of sustained economic growth in its history. Let that sink in. Longest ever.
Four people killed at a US embassy in Benghazi - terrible. But under Bush 60 people were killed in ten attacks on US embassies and consulates.
Obama could have had Bush, and especially Cheney, investigated for starting the war in Iraq and then profiting by it. Instead, for the sake of healing, he instructed the justice department to look away and not pursue the matter. Trump is the opposite. He hates and burns for revenge.
I know, facts, facts facts - they tend to have a liberal bias.
Which is why I can call you a blithering idiot, because of the above blithering idiocy, right?
Coupla things, clothy… (you know, the books that you stole your name from were some of my favorite, I should pit you just for ruining that childhood memory)
First, your definition came after my post, so chiding me for not knowing how you were defining words is pretty fucking stupid on your part, but it is to be expected.
You can call anyone anything you want, but in order to be taken seriously, your words should have some relation to reality. I could call you a felon. I could call you a murderer. I have no proof that you did these things, but I have my suspicions, and you know, people are saying…
I have as much proof that you are a murderer a rapist and a burglar as you have that Clinton is a felon, in other words, none.
If you do not wish to be considered a criminal in all future interactions with anyone, maybe you should consider having some level of proof before accusing.
And yet, she’s allowed to buy a gun, vote, serve on a jury,travel abroad, live in public housing(includes The White House), etc.
Care to revise your bullshit definition?
If she actually committed a felony, why did Comey decline to prosecute?
Let’s put Clothahump’s little theory to the test. He thinks that if people believe that Clinton is a felon, then she must be a felon, whereas I think that if he acts like a blithering idiot he must be a blithering idiot.
I think this can be decided democratically with an informal poll:
Do you think that Clinton is an actual felon, or do you think that Clothahump is a blithering idiot?
If I remember the numbers correctly, there were 110 emails that contained classified information that were not marked in any way. There were three further emails that contained classified information** but only had portion markings**, not header markings.
So, you agree that Trump is a felon because of his repeated instances of sexual assault. Sentence first, trial later, right?
Just say this crap if you are ever up for jury duty, and I guarantee you that you’ll get off, since the court wants people with some fucking clue about the law.
He’s afraid of the Clintons, duh. REMEMBER FOSTER!
A blithering idiot who has gotten kicked in the head one too many times
Why would anyone in their right mind engage you? You’re dishonest to the core. And raving to boot.
This whole thread is a bait and switch where you get to bitch at the people coming in to answer a presumably legitimate question that you yourself asked.
Sad.
I’m still waiting… is there really any disasters yet? I’m honestly wondering, I’m not the smartest dude and I’m completely open to any if they could be explained maybe.
I kinda thought that Obama gave the red line to congress so they could vote to go to war, and they chose not to. How is it his fault again?
I’m not that swift with politics, so I’m for real asking, not trying to add to the snarky tire fire…
Seeing this for the first time cheered me up for some reason, but out of consistency, I suggest the nomenclature be Clinton42 and Clinton45 (or possibly Clinton and Rodham-Clinton), following the convention established by Bush41 and Bush43.
If we’re going to respect precedent, I prefer Bush the Elder and Bush the Younger. Doesn’t help for the Clintons, though.
Male Clinton and Female Clinton.
I think it must be several dozen to have done that much damage.
I was going to suggest that he’s a gutless coward and a drooling moron, but I’ll go with blithering idiot.