** The “mistake” seems to have been expressing an opinion that the great and powerful Coldfire didn’t agree with.
The woman in the thread-in-question grossly insulted every person ever hurt by childhood sexual abuse, then demanded the compassion and respect of other Dopers for relying on the same excuse she denied others.
** Is this supposed to be a joke?
** No, it doesn’t serve us. It doesn’t even serve the moderators. It seems to serve you quite well.
** I’m in the category of people who knows that “Coldfire’s whim” != “the line”.
What is the point of bringing this up yet again. OK, you disagree with Coldfire, we get it. He’s the HMFIC so you have to listen to him. Alternatively, you can stop posting in the Pit. Are you trying to become the next martyr?
TVAA, I enjoy most all your posts, but is this really a profitable topic to pursue? I don’t think you- or Coldfire- came off very well in that thread.
Christ, the mods are not soulless robots. And tearing into a juicy hypocrite is fun, but it calls for some tact (to say the least) when they are sharing sexual abuse stories. I agreed with your reasoning, but your approach was a tad inappropriate.
I would have posted in the other Coldfire criticism thread, but someone posted it… and without explanation, as far as I could tell.
If I start treating sexually-abused idiots like idiots, I might as well abandon these boards completely. Their purpose is to point out ignorance, shoddy reasoning, and obvious hypocrits.
And this isn’t the first time Coldfire has (without cause, in my judgment) threatened me for making posts. The most notable recent example was when he warned me for making medical claims about depression – when I’ve never said anything that even implied that. He scanned my statements, saw what he expected to see, and went straight to the threats.
Could we have a LINK here? You know, it’s just not possible for everyone to follow every soap opera in every thread on the board anymore, and the hamsters are just too overworked to appreciate the overtime when curious Dopers want to find out what the hell you’re talking about TV!
I thought I showed remarkable restraint, really. I was considering using certain words that describe the female anatomy (which is not usually my habit) to refer to the human flotsam who started that thread, but I figured it wasn’t appropriate for a thread involving child sexual abuse.
Her original post, while an insult to the millions of people whose lives have been warped by abuse, isn’t particularly offensive. Her later revelations about why she didn’t press charges – leaving an abuser free to abuse again – is beneath contempt. Just thinking about it again makes me angry…
Excusing illegal actions by citing emotional trauma was invalid, according to that poster. It follows that “being too scared to testify” isn’t valid according to her own standards, so she’s condemned by her own judgment.
After all, emotional trauma doesn’t “force” anything to do anything. She made her choice – now she needs to take responsibility for it.
If you find this attitude repugnant, yell at the OPer. It’s hers, after all.
I have concern and compassion for others in the same way that a mirror has a sense of aesthetics.